Shop now Shop now Shop now Cloud Drive Photos Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen with Prime Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars102
4.4 out of 5 stars
Format: Paperback|Change
Price:£11.39+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Some acts, such as the Beatles, Dylan and the Floyd, have had so many books written about them that it is hard to come up with anything new. This book succeeds in describing two aspects of the Pink Floyd story to a level of detail I haven't found elsewhere:
-The size and diversity of the Cambridge scene; there were many other creative people, e.g. Aubrey Powell of Hipgnosis, and the friendships lasted a long time; the Floyd have a long history of supporting old mates on hard times. Syd Barrett was of course the classic instance of this. Blake makes the point that many of the people involved had missing fathers, e.g. Waters and later Barrett, and implies that they may have thus lacked role models and conventional direction; he argues that Barrett was not the only one from the Cambridge scene whose talent failed to fulfil all its promise.
-The power struggles of the post-Barrett group, with Waters and Gilmour as the strong antagonists, Mason as the diplomat, and Wright as the nice guy who would rather avoid all this aggro. This makes one wonder how the group politics would have evolved if Barrett had stayed in the band (like many "what ifs", fascinating but frustrating).
Chronologically, the book was published soon after Barrett's death, so the penultimate event is the "hell freezes over" reunion at Live8. Blake justifiably spends a long time on this, and (bearing in mind that Wright was to die not long after Barrett) Blake's view could be summed up in another well-known song lyric: "It's too late when we die to admit we don't see eye to eye".
Perhaps not the perfect Floyd biography, but probably the best to date, complementing Julian Palacios' excellent Barrett biography "Lost in the Woods". Blake is an ideal biographer, on the one hand being a devotee of his subjects (his website tells us that the first concert he saw was the Floyd performing The Wall in 1980) but on the other able to exercise analytical detachment.
0Comment|22 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 27 December 2010
Ultimately, I found this book depressing.

Written chronologically with a 'flash forward' at the start of each section, it tells the tale known by most Floyd fans: the pre-pro bands and teenage rebellion in Cambridge; drugs; cool 60s London; and trips to Europe and India by some band members and hangers-on. The one album of the Syd Barrett Floyd featuring his whimsical, eclectic talent, followed by Floyd 2 with Gilmour; a band who spent the next three years aimlessly thrashing around, producing dodgy albums, whilst trying to keep Barrett alive and sane, although as a drug victim Syd was by then both mentally ill and incapable. Meddle (and Echoes especially) eventually summarised Floyd 2's early output in a convincing manner, and while the band were toying with Dark Side they slipped off to produce the 'solid' Obscured by Clouds in a couple of weeks - a feat they were unable to achieve (or couldn't be arsed to achieve) with their main Floyd output to that date. Then Dark Side and Wish You Were Here, the high point, followed by Water's increasing domination leading to less and less musical content and more and more lyrical angst about Waters' father's death, his childhood, and Syd . Gilmour was seemingly culpable in not being bothered, despite his talent, to write anything to complement Waters' vision during the late 70's and early 80's. By the time of The Wall & The Final Cut, Wright had been sacked and the other members of the band could barely manage to be in the same room with each other. This divide and bitterness continues for 25 years, during which Waters re-stages The Wall and produces a number of very variable solo albums, including an opera, provoking modest interest, while Gilmour's Neo-Floyd create two very popular records that make a fortune, and Wright and Mason also engage in a number of relatively low-profile projects. In the end, a brief reconciliation at Live8 and a crappy 'not quite a reunion' at a post-mortem Syd memorial concert prove to be the final gasp before Wright sadly dies of cancer.

Blake indicates that Waters is a damaged, domineering, determined bully who takes it out on Wright in particular, but has mellowed by the new millennium. Wright is passive and quiet, losing musical influence because of that at time goes on. Mason is the 'happy go lucky' balanced one who mediates and would doubtless be prepared to admit he is the least competent drummer who ever made a major rock career. Gilmour is quiet, gentlemanly, but incredibly stubborn (and seemingly lazy as a composer), while the 'old' Syd was madcap but ultimately mentally ill.

The style of Blake's book is very workmanlike, while it is also very much a chronological list of, 'he did that, they did that, they said that', which is ultimately rather dull over 400 pages. But what gets me is how he almost never mentions anything positive. Was being in the Floyd really this miserable? ALL the time? The only hint of fun is their having an endless succession of 60's fashion model girlfriends - but this is quickly superseded by a collection of miserable, failed marriages. If it really was that ghastly, then poor sods (what a waste: such privileged success, ruined by bickering and bitterness) and since there MUST have been some good sides to their massive 'success' story, then, for me, Mr. Blake has somehow failed to create a rounded picture.

Solid, detailed, but flat and miserable.
22 comments|16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 15 January 2008
I have read a fair few Floyd books now including Nick Masons and i have to say this is by far and away the best and most comprehensive. It starts right back at the begining in the mid 60's right through to 2007, covering literally everything. It also covers their solo ventures during and after Floyd and also gives great info on how all the albums faired in the US and the UK (Solo's included). He must have been working on this book for years. I was very impressed that he mentioned Dave Gilmour turned up on Parkinsons show in 1999 as a session guitarist for Paul McCartney who was having a full show dedicated to him. Dave Gilmour was never mentioned on the show and i only noticed myself that he was there playing. Very impressive research. I learn't a lot about the band and its members that i never knew and will have to read it again as its hard to remember everything. Its a great story and also quite sad (Syd's decline). Roger Waters comes out of it the worst, looks like he gave Gilmour a very hard time and the rest of the band also. His ego and tempermant being his main problem. And considering the abuse he has taken, Dave Gilmour comes out of it with dignity in tact.

If your a Floyd fanantic or a casual music listener with a passing interest in the band, its a must buy.
44 comments|25 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 9 January 2014
This was a very interesting read in certain sections, especially around Syd and Dark Side. However, it does drag in some places where I struggled to stay attentive as endless names were mentioned then quickly forgotten or a reasonably innocuous event was described in too much detail.

I suspect it's great for the obsessive Floyd fan, but still just interesting enough for a casual Floyd fan like myself
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 12 August 2013
I had to give it five stars, because I don't see how it could have been any better.
I anticipated a mammoth read, a long slog through 430-ish pages trying to sift through rigid quotes and dates, more like a historical thesis than an enjoyable read. I was pleasantly surprised.
Blake's thoroughly extensive research makes for an interesting, pleasantly-paced book with no notably boring parts (which is quite a feat for its length). It covers everything and was the first Floyd book I've read, and was satisfying enough to probably qualify as the last.
In parts it's as if Blake was an extra member, there at the scene, a fly-on-the-wall. He wasn't, he's evidently just a brilliant writer. This covers everything, leaves no holes, no cobwebs. All bandmates, all albums, all tours and everything. Just excellence.
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 1 October 2007
Having enjoyed Nick Mason's insider's view of the Floyd, I found this book to be the perfect companion volume. Blake doesn't suffer from Mason's need to ameliorate the bad feeling and massage the egos of the people with whom he grew up. This means Blake can take a more objective assessment of what happened with Syd Barrett, and just exactly what went on during the recording of "The Wall" to kick off such bad vibes between Roger Waters and the rest of the band. Where Nick Mason, diplomatically following Gilmour's lead, chose to 'forget' details, Blake interviews not just the band members, but others who were involved on the management, production and session aspects. Nobody comes out smelling of roses, and it's clear that there was often more than two sides to many of the conflicts, and more players than those who were officially in the band.

An excellent book for anyone interested in the Floyd story.
0Comment|28 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 12 March 2010
Blake does the most comprehensive, objective job thus far with narrative covering events almost up to Richard Wright's death. Thoughtful evaluations of all performances and recordings are especially valuable.

For a good tangential perspective, Guy Pratt's "My Bass and Other Animals" is also essential reading.
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 22 October 2007
There have been many books written about Pink Floyd, but apart from 'A Saucerful Of Secrets' by Nicholas Shaffner, which was written in the 1980's, none of them have even tried to examine the characters that make up the band. 'Pigs Might Fly' goes far far beyond 'A Saucerful Of Secrets' as the writer seems to have interviewed dozens and dozens of people close to Pink Floyd, especially when they were growing up in Cambridge. This means lots and lots of new stories and recollections you haven't read hundreds of times before. It sometimes misses the fresh input of the band themselves if only to help explain their actions over the years. But overall this is a fascinating read, which will surely turn out to be the last word on Pink Floyd at least until Roger Waters or David Gilmour dare to tell their stories. Don't hold your breath!
0Comment|16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 26 May 2009
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1845132610/ref=cm_cr_rev_prod_title

It is extremely well written by Mark Blake who has gone in to great detail about each band member's background. He has explained to the reader where they came from, who their families and friends were and the schools they went to.
Mark Blake writes intelligently and with great fluency. It is a pleasure for a Pink Floyd fan, who has grown up with their music, to read through.

I highly recommend this book to everyone who would like more of an insight and understanding of the band, it's members and music.

I will not easily lend this book!

Shine on......
0Comment|6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
VINE VOICEon 24 April 2008
If before the only two genuinely essential Pink Floyd books were Nicholas Shaffner's Saucerful Of Secrets and Nick Mason's Inside Out then this is most definitely the best,as
1)it doesn't skimp on scurrilous details (such as Roger Waters' bizarre falling out with Ron Geesin) like Mason's book does.
and
2)It gives a far more balanced account of Roger Waters then Shaffner's book,which I think was tainted by his eagerness to please those he interviewed (Mason & Gilmour) by praising the frankly poor Momentary Lapse Of Reason album and criticising Waters at every opportunity.
0Comment|6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)