Top critical review
This revision guide does contain some useful information. However
on 9 May 2015
This revision guide does contain some useful information.
However, some of the information is absolute nonsense and there are repeated misused words. For example, when speaking about the epistolary form which some chapters are written in (the chapters which are letters), the book uses the word 'epistemological' which is completely wrong and is actually to do with philosophy.
Some points in the guide make little sense and quotations do not always support the point made or are not fully explained.
However, I have found the guide useful in terms of identifying frequently used authorial methods.