Top critical review
One person found this helpful
Nice read, but could have been better
on 21 February 2013
Interesting to read but lacked excitement which it should have had. Also tended to veer into directions that were unnecessary to the narrative or the plot. Need to link events in the whole story better. I gave it three stars because of the writers imagination.
As with most of the author's books, the concepts and ideas are great. However, there is a lack of depth, lots of grammatical errors. I think the author needs to learn to create suspense, build up sub plots, and link events to the main theme (or give clues at least) and not write from the head. Due to this I would not pay to read this but I think his work would be bestsellers if he went down the publishing route and had his work properly proof read.