Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars79
4.1 out of 5 stars
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

TOP 500 REVIEWERon 21 November 2004
Among Stephen King's large body of work, there are admittedly a few duds, but in far greater number are the really super pieces of work, the great books that will stand the test of time and, eventually, he will be deservedly remembered for. There are at least 5 which could vie for the "his best book" accolade, and Gerald's Game is one of them. It is, in a word, superb.
It is one of King's most eccentric books, in terms of the rest of his work. There is no horror here at all, at least not of the ghouly kind. Instead, we sink down into the mind of one character, trapped in a cabin for four hundred pages, and see the internal horrors that lie within it. It is a psychological novel more than anything, which would most probably appeal to fans of authors like Ruth Rendell or Ian McEwan - fans of writers whose normal subject is the human mind, its messinesses and ways of preservation, its internal conflicts and idiosyncrasies. Gerald's Game is a excellent book because King is able to keep us in the company of one single character, alone in a room, tied to a bed, for almost the entire book, and never do we experience a moment of boredom. It would be difficult to overstate the level of achievement this illustrates.
Obviously, not everyone's going to like it. There are people who will find this book boring, and will want more action, more obvious thrills and excitements. If you like subtlety, though, more focused and mental thrills which spring from a more psychological well, this book is for you. It's a marvellous exercise in form and structure, and an absolutely gripping psychological novel. I think King's best work is normally produced when he moves away from overt horror, and this is an example of that. It's a sharp, deeply engaging and gripping book that is no less terrifying than if there were vampires or ghosts involved. Read it. It's not only unique among King's work, but in almost everything else I've read as well.
55 comments|45 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
Stephen King remarked in his book On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, that as a child he often used to play a game with friends and family which involved one person thinking of a scenario, which the others then had to invent a way to escape from. This story feels like a product of one of those sessions.

He also mentions that inspiration often strikes when he asks himself 'what if...?'. In this case, the 'What if' would be 'What if you were handcuffed to a bed, acting out a kinky sex game with your husband in a house located in a secluded part of the countryside, when he suddenly dies of a heart attack? How would you survive and escape? His characteristic ingenuity is employed as he tells what happens next, what goes on in the mind of the main character as she not only struggles with her situation, but also with memories that surface from her childhood.

Stephen King tends to write two kinds of thrillers - those like Under the Dome and Salem's Lot which have a large cast of characters, and those like Misery and The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon where the bulk of the story involves only one - or sometimes two - characters. This is one of the latter kind - it's a claustrophobic tale, with lots of internal dialogue (the main character has two or three internal voices that speak to her as she starts to crack up). He often uses this device; it lets us in on the thoughts of the character in an immediate and involving way, whilst also giving him the chance to make the character more life-like whilst also having the chance to add humour and other things that would otherwise be quite difficult to include.

Some of the memories that the central character has involve her father sexually abusing her when she was 12, and I found this quite uncomfortable to read. SK has a very vivid style, and although it was fairly brief and didn't involve penetration or anything physically very graphic, I found it unpleasant to read. Strange that, because some of the gorier moments - although horrible - weren't anywhere near as difficult for me. So - if you, like me, have an aversion for this kind of scene, you might want to bear this in mind before you decide to buy.

There's a nice metaphor running through the story - that she can't escape the physical bonds of her current sexual world until she comes to terms with the psychological ones that she has buried in her past.

I found myself turning pages before I had finished them, so eager was I to find out what happens next - and it's this that draws me to Stephen King's writing. It's not one of his more action-packed of tales, in that it all takes place in the bedroom of a holiday home, but it racks up the tension in a way that only King can.

0Comment|4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 27 June 2008
Worrying though it is to admit this, these days, without my diary, I am lost. There used to be a time when I could remember to do the things that my colleagues requested of me without a written aid: now, they don't even ask me - they just flick to the relevant page and diarise it for me to find when I get to work on any given day. I mention my inadequacy merely to make a point: although I finished Gerald's Game a month prior to writing this review, I can still remember it vividly. For someone who is clearly losing their memory, this is an achievement that deserves a tribute - a tribute not to my ability to recall something that happened less than four weeks ago, but to Stephen King, who, as a novelist, is able to write such a horrifyingly memorable story.

Briefly, "A game. A husband-and-wife game. Gerald's Game. But this time Jessie didn't want to play. Lying there, spreadeagled and handcuffed to the bedstead while he'd loomed and drooled over her, she'd felt angry and humiliated. So she'd kicked out hard. Aimed to hit him where it hurt. And now he was dead - a coronary - on the floor. Leaving Jessie alone and helpless in a lakeside holiday cabin. Miles from anywhere. No-one to hear her screams. Alone. Except for the voices in her head that had begun to chatter and argue and sneer".

How you rate this book will largely depend upon three factors: how you take to the book initially, what you think of Jessie's "back-story" and whether you are offended by the subtle presence of sexism which seems to provide the undertone to the book. Reading through reviews both here and on other websites, I noticed a polarisation of opinion when it came to discussing the direction of the book. On the one hand, you had readers who felt that the book began on a climatic note but thought that it got steadily worse as the pace slowed down. On the other hand, you have the readers who found the beginning of the book difficult to get into but felt that their persistence was ultimately rewarded further down the line. Thankfully, I fall into the second group mentioned (up until around page 40, I didn't think I was going to like Stephen King's writing style): how you rate the book will largely be determined by whether you do too.

As another reviewer has pointed out on, "The novel comes from two distinct angles: the story angle and the message angle". Given the nature of the book, these two angles are inseparable: you can't have one without the other (and you probably wouldn't have enough material if you tried). Whilst the majority of readers seem to agree on the success of the "story angle", what seems to divide the opinion of others is the "message" that is being conveyed. For some, Jessie's "gimmick-instant self-therapy for survival" ([...]) is cliched and unrealistic: for others, it is rewarding and necessary. Again, I fall into the latter category. I thought that "forever flicking backwards and forwards from the past to the present (and)... in effect, watching Jessie grow up" ([...]) gave the book an incredible sense of balance and development that it would not otherwise have had. Whilst Gerald's demise is as much comedic as it is tragic, it acts as a turning point in Jessie's life - not least because of her physical isolation. Gerald's forcefulness and determination to play HIS game (and, as another reviewer pointed out, it is "his" game because he is the only one playing it) are the catalyst for Jessie's "voices" to shout above the din - to bring to the surface the repressed memories previously buried in her subconscious mind. Jessie spends the rest of the book confronting the painful memories of the "abuse" suffered at the hands of her father ("Facing the memory (of her father) turns out to be nearly as big a challenge as escaping from the bed" - [...]) and, on summoning the strength to face her "Space Cowboy" (Joubert), whose physical ugliness is the embodiment of the emotional ugliness that Jessie faced in the past, she gets revenge by spitting in his face (an action which absolves her from her previous feelings of guilt, confusion and responsibility). Whilst, I am not altogether certain as to whether I only experienced such a sense of closure when I finished this book because I am a woman (and, therefore, probably more able to relate to Jessie's plight than a man would be), what I am certain of, however, is that I have been on our heroine's emotional journey with her and, on finishing the book, felt like I, too, had experienced her victory.

As far as the subtle sexism goes, it must have been VERY subtle, because it totally passed me by when I was actually reading the book. It was only when I read the other reviews and thought about it in hindsight, that I realised it might actually be there. Stephen King been quoted as saying "very few men can write through the eyes of a woman" - not considering himself to be one of these few men. Indeed, some have suggested that this leads to an over-compensation in the character of Jessie. Buoyed by the philosophy that "somewhere there is always a woman who pays the price because of a man" ([...] Jessie epitomises the stereotypical independent woman who is forced to "deglove" herself on the realisation that there will be no knight in shining armour. Yet for some, Jessie's strength only exists in relation to the male weakness around her: she is only so "good" because the men around her are so "bad". Ironically, "King merely combats one form of sexism with another" (, and there is a clear suggestion the sexism goes both ways. To some, Jessie is not only sexist, but is also the victim of sexism - a sexism created unintentionally by the author. Jessie's hatred of men, albeit justified, could be interpreted as being ultra-feminist. In this light, suddenly the heroine goes from being inspirational to patronised - a double-whammy which I am sure was never intended.

I always knew that one day I would read a Stephen King novel. My mother is forever telling me stories of how she used to read to me as a baby - with "IT" as a first choice book. The question that I have to ask myself is whether or not I will come back to him now I have sampled his work for myself. Without a doubt, Gerald's Game used minimalism to it's advantage: without a doubt, it creates a tremendous sense of panic when you realise it could happen to you: and, without a doubt, only a truly gifted writer could "rely upon the thoughts of just one character to carry the whole book" ([...] The question remains, then, as to whether I will read "The Cell" which is sitting on my bedroom table: The answer? Without a doubt.
22 comments|3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 2 January 2008
I put off reading this book for years. it just seemed such a dark concept - and i think it's probably a good thing i didn't read it when i was fourteen, but when i finally did read it (in huge chunks while train travelling probably helped) it was unbearable - in a good way.

I can't reccomend it unconditionally because it's incredibly dark - and graphic in every way conceivable, but it really effected me - you can't sleepwalk through this book.

from squirming in a train seat - unable to stop myself from clutching the back of my neck for some reason to the the adrenalin rush as i read the final chapters late at night in a hotel room when i had a very early start the next morning then being unable to sleep for well over an hour because i was so excited this is a phenomenal read.

but it probably shouldn't be your first stephen king novel.
0Comment|4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 8 October 2010
This is definitely not a light read and once you get past the first few chapters it does need your undivided attention. I did not think that it could scare me, but it did stay with me at night when all the lights were out, and gave me an uncomfortable feeling. The horror is subtle and created in your own mind rather then in the words on the paper, just like Jessies experience.
Kings skill in not forgetting the small detail is not lost here and his talent as a male writer to write from a female perspective shines through in this.
It is not one if you are new to Stephen King, but if you have previously read and enjoyed Kings books then I would definitely recommend it.
0Comment|3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 13 October 2004
Well in my opinion this book is one of the Kings best. It has all the suspence and more that you would expect from Stephen King and is well written and a good read. At 416 pages it is just right. You realy get to know and feel for Jessie and the tiein with Dolores Claiborne is very well done. I would recomend both reading and buying this book.
0Comment|4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 24 October 2009
One of his best. The classic King scenario: place a character in an impossible situation for an unfathomable length of time, alone, and write a whole novel about it.

You are in a cabin in the woods. During one of his sex games your husband has handcuffed you to the bed, but then goes and keels over with a heart attack. What do you do?

The starting point for some immacuately paced writing. King builds and releases tension with indefinable grace. There are moments of squeamish physical horror but it is not strictly a horror novel, for the most part it is all pyschological as we inhabit the female protagonists mind for what seems an unendurable length of time. This is gripping and you'll read it in one sitting. King has a remarkable empathy and deft touch when it comes to drawing his female characters (evident also in Dolores Claibourne) and that empathy is evident here.

Recommended to anyone who wants a lesson in how to structure a story and the masterly use of dramatic tension or those seeking a truly fantastic read.
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 20 February 2000
This book happens to be the first I have ever read of Mr. King's vast library, and most certainly won't be my last. Of course I've seen the movie renditions of his past works but not being able to put a book down for a second hasn't been one of my most habitual tendencies. It's an amazing read and really does play with your own thoughts (reading this novel in the privacies of my own dark bedroom late at night didn't help one bit, I couldn't even get up to go to the bathroom at some of the mind twisting moments). Very intreguing seeing what Jessie does in her situation and how she thinks and experiences all of our darkest fears, confronting them face to face. I'll cut this short, simple and straight to the point, if you ever have a chance to read this book, do it, you won't be disapointed (You'll probably never take life or freedom for granted ever again either).
-Bryan Johnston, Stephen King's newest fan
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 12 April 2010
I took this book on my holidays to Turkey recently, and I couldn't put it down, I'm sure I finished it in a day! The story is very frightening, the thing I found disturbing was, unlike some of Stephen King's stories such as Firestarter or IT, this sort of situation could possibly occur in real life. Seriously, after reading this, whether you are male or female, you will be put off bondage / sex games for life!

I feel the story flowed very well generally, however I'm not sure about the serial killer / person with jewellery bag part of the story, this just seemed like a random addition in my opinion and didn't really need to be in the story? But that's just my opinion.

You can pick this book up second hand for literally pennies, so it's definitely worth adding to your book collection.

Hopefully, they may make a film of this story one day!
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 27 March 2006
Jessie Burlingame has become ever more tired of her husband Gerald's kinky sex games, but when he suddenly dies during a session, leaving her handcuffed to a bed in a remote house, the game becomes deadly. And now Jessie finds herself caught like a spider in a web, unable to move, afraid of the monster that may lie right outside the house (or inside for that matter!). However, listening to the voices in her own head, she begins to find that not all of the monsters are "out there," some are right inside her own mind!
This is an intense book, a book about horror, but not knife-wielding killers. Instead this is a deep and intense look at the horrors that people inflict on others and on themselves. I found this to be a challenging book - hard to keep reading, but impossible to put down. It's not a happy book, but it is a fascinating and horrifying read, one that will keep you on the edge of your seat!
0Comment|16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Customers also viewed these items

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.