Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars BUT DO THE COVER NOTES MENTION HIS RETRACTION AND APOLOGY??
No one who appreciates great American literature would criticize Mark Twain's skill as a satirist. But anybody interested in knowing the whole truth should be aware that after Twain published this book -- and after his daughter was healed through Christian Science treatment -- he offered a full retraction and an apology that really should be included on the cover of...
Published on 23 Aug. 1999

versus
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars funny even to a non-CS
This isn't one of Twain's best books, but it is a pretty hilarious send-up of Christian Science nonetheless. I think it is funnier if you know a little bit about the religion, but it probably doesn't seem as funny to people who actually practice the religion.
A CS friend told me that CSs are fond of quoting passages from Twain that "prove" he became a...
Published on 22 July 1999


Most Helpful First | Newest First

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars funny even to a non-CS, 22 July 1999
By A Customer
This isn't one of Twain's best books, but it is a pretty hilarious send-up of Christian Science nonetheless. I think it is funnier if you know a little bit about the religion, but it probably doesn't seem as funny to people who actually practice the religion.
A CS friend told me that CSs are fond of quoting passages from Twain that "prove" he became a fan of Eddy in later life. The quote they cite as proof is typical of the sarcasm in this book: "Mother Eddy deserves a place in the Trinity as much as any member of it. She has organized and made available a healing principle that for two thousand years has never been employed except as the merest kind of guesswork. She is the benefactor of the age."
If the above quote strikes you as funny, buy this book. If you believe the quote is serious, I'd advise you to give it a miss.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars BUT DO THE COVER NOTES MENTION HIS RETRACTION AND APOLOGY??, 23 Aug. 1999
By A Customer
No one who appreciates great American literature would criticize Mark Twain's skill as a satirist. But anybody interested in knowing the whole truth should be aware that after Twain published this book -- and after his daughter was healed through Christian Science treatment -- he offered a full retraction and an apology that really should be included on the cover of this and any subsequent edition.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 3 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Incoherent, 5 Dec. 1998
By A Customer
The back cover proclaims, "This witty, caustic work is Mark Twain's extended attack on Christian Science and its founder, Mary Baker Eddy [1821-1910]. . . ."(1) The book was written between 1898 and 1903, and some parts of it appeared in magazines during that time period. Publication of the completed work was delayed for almost four years until 1907.
In the preface, Twain notes that his original text included "errors of judgment and of fact. I have now corrected these to the best of my ability and later knowledge."(2) Twain was in the habit of making these corrections using dated footnotes. The last dated correction is from March 12, 1903, meaning that no corrections were made during the book's publication delay. This is important to note, because his remarks were not entirely contemporaneous by the time the book was actually published (and they are less so by today's standards).
For instance, in the April issue of the "North American Review," Mark Twain challenged Mrs. Eddy to discontinue her personal use of the title "Mother." Due to public misunderstanding, Mrs. Eddy responded by amending one of her church bylaws forbidding church members to call her that. When Twain's book appeared in 1907, he had not updated the fact that Mrs. Eddy had acceded to his challenge, and he included new material lampooning her for use of the term. Consequently, some criticism of Twain is deserved, particularly because this misconception is still being propagated in the current editions. Furthermore, Mrs. Eddy continued her writing after this book was published, and quotations from "Science and Health With Key to the Scriptures" and the "Manual of The Mother Church" are not from the latest editions. This also may cause the reader to come away with impressions that are not fully informed.
Twain spends a lot of time analyzing Mrs. Eddy's writing. He came to the conclusion that Mrs. Eddy was not actually the author of "Science and Health." This has fueled many rumors throughout the years. Twain, however, was not aware until after publication of the book that Rev. James Wiggin, a religious editor at the University Press, had lent a hand in editing the book. William Dana Orcutt, Vice-President and General Manager of the University Press, defended her authorship by stating, "there never was the slightest intimation that Mr. Wiggin's services passed beyond those of an experienced editor."(3)
Twain makes a lot of accusations of greed against Mrs. Eddy which I find to be totally unmerited. Professor Vic Doyno admitted in his foreword that "a minor factor in Twain's raging against Christian Science was, let us say it, something resembling jealousy."(4) Twain repeats Frederick Peabody's accusation that Mrs. Eddy claimed that she was the equal of Jesus.(5) I disagree with this claim. The basis for Peabody's accusation is a quote taken out of context from "The Christian Science Journal" for April, 1889.(6) Twain paints a picture of Mrs. Eddy as a rogue with a masterful mind for business, because he routinely misinterprets her motives. Twain's well known love for controversy may also be at work here.
Twain was more charitable in his analysis of the Christian Science religion, than he was in the portrait sketch its founder. Twain scholar Hamlin Hill writes in his afterword, "reviewers of the articles, on both sides of the controversy, noted ambiguity and inconsistency in both the matter and the manner of the material--its tone, its argument, its coherence. 'Harper's Weekly' could not decided 'whether Mark Twain approves Christian Science or not' (December 1902); and when the book finally appeared in 1907, the reviewer for the 'Spectator' thought readers would be 'bewildered by the confused method' of the work (April 6, 1907), while the 'Nation' decided that it was neither 'a serious nor a humerous contribution to the discussion' (February 14, 1907)."(7)
At times, Twain's view of Christian Science could be very complimentary: "For the thing back of it is wholly gracious and beautiful: the power, through loving mercifulness and compassion, to heal fleshly ills and pains and griefs--all--with a word, with a touch of the hand! This power was given by the Saviour to the Disciples, and to all the converted. All--every one. It was exercised for generations afterwards. Any Christian who was in earnest and not a make-believe, not a policy-Christian, not a Christian for revenue only, had that healing power, and could cure with it any disease or any hurt or damage possible to human flesh and bone. These things are true, or they are not. If they were true seventeen and eighteen and nineteen centuries ago it would be difficult to satisfactory explain why or how or by what argument that power should be non-existent in Christians now."(8) I think that there are a lot of Christian Scientists who would be proud to have written that paragraph.
In conclusion, only occasional flashes of Twain's good humor shine through the extreme sarcasm. This is described by Hamlin Hill in his afterword, "The dilemma of 'Christian Science' is that calm judicial good humor was lost in acerbic bitterness."(9) In all, I do not recommend this book. For those interested in Christian Science, I instead recommend selections from the Mary Baker Eddy Twentieth-Century Biographers Series, many of which are available through Amazon.
Notes: (1) Mark Twain, "Christian Science" (1907; reprint, with foreword by Vic Doyno, Buffalo: Promethius, 1993). (2) Ibid., p. 3. (3) William Dana Orcutt, "In Quest of the Perfect Book" (1926; reprint, Freeport: Books for Libraries Press, 1970), p. 52f. (4) Twain, Promethius, p. vii. (5) Twain, Promethius, p. 191f (6) "The Christian Science Journal" 7, no. 1 (April, 1889): p. 3. (7) Mark Twain, "Christian Science" (1907; reprint, with foreword by Shelley Fisher Fishkin, with introduction by Garry Wills, with afterword by Hamlin Hill, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), afterword p. 4. (8) Twain, Promethius, p. 155. (9) Twain, Oxford, afterword p. 10.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Christian Science
Christian Science by Mark Twain (Hardcover - 20 Feb. 2006)
£16.08
Usually dispatched within 2 to 3 weeks
Add to basket Add to wishlist
Only search this product's reviews