Customer Reviews


9 Reviews
5 star:
 (8)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Shakespeare - Swan or ugly duckling ?
Reading Schoenbaum, Ackroyd, Shapiro, Wood and others' traditional "Stratford" biographies I have been less than impressed by the amount of corroborative fact they provide in their "his name is on the books so it must have happened like this" approach based on sparse contemporary historical records, hearsay (Scuttlebutt as Price would say) and inferences from the texts,...
Published 8 months ago by Huck Flynn

versus
0 of 4 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Lubrication by midnight oil.
Hyperbole by the covert agenda critiques does this interesting book few favours.The author has dutifully burned the midnight oil and produced a package of calm discussion. There is nothing that is actually new contained within it but the approaches to the examination and utility of its content make for an interesting read. The slant in terms of construction given to much...
Published 14 months ago by Donald Bain


Most Helpful First | Newest First

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Shakespeare - Swan or ugly duckling ?, 5 Sept. 2014
By 
Huck Flynn "huckleberry" (northern ireland) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)   
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography New Evidence of an Authorship Problem (Paperback)
Reading Schoenbaum, Ackroyd, Shapiro, Wood and others' traditional "Stratford" biographies I have been less than impressed by the amount of corroborative fact they provide in their "his name is on the books so it must have happened like this" approach based on sparse contemporary historical records, hearsay (Scuttlebutt as Price would say) and inferences from the texts, although a few tell a good story.
Price spreads out all that we actually know from contemporary records, including possible, suspected references from the period and not only analyses them but gives the best interpretations of the "facts" i have yet read to build a credible picture of Shakspere of Stratford. It's not always a flattering portrait but it fits well with the evidence, and a lot of the rumour of the time.
It leaves us with a street smart (unscrupuous?) entrepreneur and successful business man who came from the country and made good in the big city but shows how unlikely he is to be the genius behind the bulk of the poetry and drama published under the name of WIlliam Shakespeare. Price doesn't speculate on the exact identity of likely candidates (except the suggestion that they were nobility) and avoids the pitfalls of portrait analysis and detailed intepretations of the sonnets that have spoiled some other books on the topic. If you are interested in the debate (and why wouldn't you be?) then this is an excellent place to start.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


43 of 52 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Information not found in traditional biographies, 15 Aug. 2002
By A Customer
I have been a Shakespeare fan for some time, but am relatively new to the question of who actually wrote the plays. I found this book an ideal beginning place for those also interested, for in providing uncomfortable documentary evidence that traditional scholarship typically ignores, it pushed me farther along in my suspicion that, whoever wrote the works of Shakespeare, it was not the man from Stratford.
In very readable terms Price shows that there is indeed enormous room to doubt the traditional attribution of the plays. Rather than try to influence potential readers with only my opinions, I will let the book speak for itself by mentioning a few items which most impressed me, in the hope that this will convey the tone of the book as a whole:
Traditional scholars express disbelief at the suggestion that the Stratfordian was a "front man" for a high-born anonymous author: "Why use an actual person? Why not just a false name?" However, Price renders this objection moot by quoting the Elizabethan Robert Greene, who wrote of poets who "for their calling and gravity, being loath to have any profane pamphlets pass under their hand, get some other Battillus to set his name to their verses." (Battillus was an ancient who put his name to the works of Virgil.) Thus, Price provides proof that in Elizabethan England front men were indeed employed by anonymous authors to protect their reputations. Whether scholars want to believe it or not, it was done.
Traditional scholars also protest that no one doubted Shakespeare's authorship during his lifetime. Price again quotes contemporary records to prove this another falsehood. Apparently the mystery surrounding the Shakespeare authorship dates back to the 1590's, for even as the works were printed some readers took the name "Shakespeare" to be a pseudonym for (variously) Francis Bacon, Samuel Daniel, and Edward Dyer.
Traditional scholarship's claim that the actor Shakspere was also a writer is founded on an ambiguous passage about a "Shake-scene" from the 1592 pamphlet "Greene's Groatsworth of Wit." (Aside from this passage, they have *nothing* dating from Shakspere's life which clearly states that he was "Shakespeare.") However -- and for the first time that I've ever seen -- Price places the "Shake-scene" passage *within the context of the pamphlet as a whole*. I was shocked to learn that the whole first section of "Groatsworth" -- never mentioned by orthodox scholars -- deals with a seemingly autobiographical account of how Greene was misused and cheated by a greedy, moneylending actor who brokered plays and took credit for others' writings. The description of the actor tallies exactly with the picture we get of the Stratfordian's character from his later business activities. (Why have we never been told this in traditional biographies?)
(Price also shows that, despite scholars' claim that the "Shake-scene" passage represents Greene's envy that a mere actor should show success at playwrighting, that is apparently not how Elizabethans interpreted it. She quotes the one Elizabethan allusion we have to the passage -- and its author took the "Shake-scene" passage as representing an unethical moneylending actor who takes credit for others' writings.)
Similarly, Price shows how traditional scholarship -- for no good reason -- rejects some records related to Shakspere, but accepts others on far weaker grounds. For example, Shakspere's first recorded activity in London is a 1592 document which shows him lending 7 pounds (a large sum of money then). Most biographers, if they mention it at all, reject this record as referring to "another Shakspere" -- even though it is perfectly congruent with Shakspere's later known moneylending activities. Apparently the only reason this record is rejected is that this *fact* about Shakspere's early London activity does not match scholars' *beliefs* about his supposed early writing career.
Similarly, Price brings to light contradictions in the historical record which orthodox scholars gloss over. For example, biographers claim that during the Christmas season of 1597 Shakspere was fulfilling professional commitments by performing at Court with his theater company. (As it is documented that the company indeed did. It was their most important engagement.) They also acknowledge that the records show that Shakspere was regularly in Stratford, engaged in business. However, what they fail to mention is that the documents indicate Shakspere was doing mundane business in Stratford *at exactly the same time* that he was supposedly performing at Court as a key member of "his company." Price shows how traditional biographies typically deal with these incompatible records: by placing them in different chapters, apparently in the hope that no one will notice the obvious conflict in timing.
And much more ...
From what I have seen, this book has been a great embarrassment to traditional scholarship, for it clearly demonstrates how weak much of that scholarship has been, based on assumptions taken as fact, unquestioned received wisdom, and circular logic. And since Price quotes only orthodox sources, she shows how orthodoxy has painted *itself* into a number of mutually incompatible corners. This is an essential book for any open-minded Shakespeare fan.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars An unorthodox biography, 21 Jan. 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography New Evidence of an Authorship Problem (Paperback)
I originally got this from the local library and enjoyed it so much I wanted my own copy. An eyeopening piece of research. Everyone should read it. It will open your eyes as to the lack of evidence that exists regarding William Shakspeare being the playwright Shakespeare.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Food for thought!, 13 April 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography New Evidence of an Authorship Problem (Paperback)
Anyone interested in learning more about Shakespeare or the authorship question will benefit from reading this excellently written and extensively researched book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 10 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A Devastating Rebuttal of the Traditional Shakespeare Story, 2 Jun. 2013
By 
Etheldreda (Dublin 4 Ireland) - See all my reviews
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography New Evidence of an Authorship Problem (Paperback)
If you are in any way interested in the Shakespeare authorship question, you MUST read this book. I challenge anyone who reads this book with an open mind to tell me that the authorship question is 'beyond doubt', because it most certainly is not. Diana Price brings forward a wealth of meticulous research and analysis about the life of Will Shaxpere of Stratford, all of which combines to cast very considerable doubt on the idea that he was the great poet-dramatist, or indeed a writer of any sort. The most impressive section of the book concerns Price's comparison of the documented facts about Shaxpere with those of contemporary writers. She searches the historical record for documentation in 10 different categories (eg links to a patron, evidence of education, possession of books) with regard to 24 Elizabethan writers. ALL of the writers have left evidence in at least 2 or 3 of the categories (Ben Jonson in all 10) - all that is, except Shaxpere, who left evidence in none of them. This is not easy for Shaxpere's defenders to explain away, to put it mildly.

Naturally, orthodox scholars have done their very best to challenge Price's conclusions, but given how carefully researched her book is, they've had an extremely hard time picking holes in her arguments. Anyone who thinks authorship sceptics are 'cranks' or 'conspiracy theorists' needs to read this book, as it demonstrates very conclusively that, whatever those with vested interests in the Shaxpere myth would have you believe, there most definitely IS an authorship problem.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 11 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Best book ever on Shakespeare Authorship issue, coolly dispassionate but very engaged., 17 Jan. 2013
By 
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
The best book on the Shakespeare Authorship question.

Pure scepticism about the claim the man from Stratford wrote the plays of Shakespeare, or was even a writer. She shows clearly there is no contemporary, relevant, personal literary evidence linking anyone to the plays, or linking the man from Stratford (christened William Shagsper) to the plays. And before anyone says there isn't such evidence for many or any other writers of the time, Price shows that there was such evidence for twenty-five major to minor writers of the same period, but zero, yes zero, for Shagsper. This is the only book that orthodox Shakespeare scholars should answer.

The host of alternative candidates makes for interesting speculation, but none have any firm evidence, only circumstantial evidence, just like William Shagsper of Stratford. There are some great books discussing the alternatives: Robin Williams on Mary Sidney, Charles Beauclerck on the Earl of Oxford (and subject of the excellent film Anonymous) or Ros Barber's The Marlowe Papers. In a talk I heard Price give, she was even straightforward enough to say that she thought the best circumstantial evidence was for William Shagsper! A must read.

Criminal it costs so much, though. Where is the paperback?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars this was a birthday present that I was very reluctant ..., 19 Sept. 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography New Evidence of an Authorship Problem (Paperback)
this was a birthday present that I was very reluctant to give away. need to get it again for me!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 9 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Exceptional, 18 Mar. 2012
An extremely thorough and critical study of the Shakespeare authorship question. I highly recommend it to anyone with an interest in Elizabethan/Jacobean literature, history and the thorny subject of who wrote the works attributed to William Shakespeare.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 4 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Lubrication by midnight oil., 9 Mar. 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography New Evidence of an Authorship Problem (Paperback)
Hyperbole by the covert agenda critiques does this interesting book few favours.The author has dutifully burned the midnight oil and produced a package of calm discussion. There is nothing that is actually new contained within it but the approaches to the examination and utility of its content make for an interesting read. The slant in terms of construction given to much of the content allows the reader to query as to why the rhetorical constitution applied to parts of the work would not have been better replaced by broadening the the cover to include a few more "whereas it may be seen that..." style expansions.
documentary evidence is undoubtedly a powerful weapon in the research armoury but that appertaining to Shakespeare has to be exhaustively compared, contrasted. contextualized, and sifted within the milieu of other forms of evidence and material. So in that respect this book most certainly deserves to be stewing in the Shakespeare sauce.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography New Evidence of an Authorship Problem
Used & New from: £13.95
Add to wishlist See buying options
Only search this product's reviews