Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A much required alternative view
All history is political and it's almost invariably written by the winners. The author shows how the historical consensus on this period is often merely state propoganda.
Rather than just using history books as source and compounding the innaccuracies contained therein, Paul Scott utilises contemporary accounts and original documents.
He shows how unpopular the...
Published on 8 Nov 2010 by Muckledug

versus
1 of 6 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars The case for an Independent Scotland
Paul Henderson Scott has produced yet another in a long series of Nationalist Diatribes attempting to make the case for the dissolution of the 1707 Union, and ultimately the construction of an independent Scottish state.

Henderson Scott makes his case, in my view less than convincingly, that the 1707 union was passed solely by corruption and bribery, dismissing...
Published on 7 Sep 2008 by D. Ranger


Most Helpful First | Newest First

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A much required alternative view, 8 Nov 2010
This review is from: The Union of 1707: Why and How (Paperback)
All history is political and it's almost invariably written by the winners. The author shows how the historical consensus on this period is often merely state propoganda.
Rather than just using history books as source and compounding the innaccuracies contained therein, Paul Scott utilises contemporary accounts and original documents.
He shows how unpopular the union was among the ordinary people of Scotland and how it wasn't only bribery and corruption but threat of invasion that motivated the Scottish Parliament to pass the Act of Union.
A welcome challenge to the many derivative and 'spun' accounts that have constituted the received wisdom on this chapter of history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars A good read if a little dry, 27 Jan 2013
By 
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Union of 1707: Why and How (Paperback)
This book is a good introduction to the Treaty of Union 1707.

For sure, being the product of one person, it is one view but I don't agree with the first reviewer that it is part of a "long series of nationalist diatribes". In fact, Mr Henderson Scott does not express a modern day view on the Treaty anywhere in the book and most of his arguments are historical and based on quotes from documents and letter.

I would say this is a well researched book though, being rather thin at 85 pages, I am left wondering how selective Mr Henderson Paul might have been in his use of research material. At the end of the day, though an extremely important aspect of Scottish politics for the next few years, this is a first stab at an much misunderstood and much unknown subject.

Perhaps the first reviewer should put pen to paper add to the debate through research?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 6 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars The case for an Independent Scotland, 7 Sep 2008
By 
D. Ranger (Great Britain) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Union of 1707: Why and How (Paperback)
Paul Henderson Scott has produced yet another in a long series of Nationalist Diatribes attempting to make the case for the dissolution of the 1707 Union, and ultimately the construction of an independent Scottish state.

Henderson Scott makes his case, in my view less than convincingly, that the 1707 union was passed solely by corruption and bribery, dismissing long held evidence that those 'bribed' were a small minority even if they did hold influence. He ignores much evidence that may contradict his argument and relies on a self confessed fraud for much of his contemporary evidence.

For readers seeking an introduction to the 1707 union you are better looking elsewhere for a less politically motivated account. Politically motivated history writing is often bad history and this account is in my view such an example.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

The Union of 1707: Why and How
The Union of 1707: Why and How by Paul Henderson Scott (Paperback - 6 May 2006)
Used & New from: £1.96
Add to wishlist See buying options
Only search this product's reviews