Customer Reviews


7 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (3)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Saying the Unsayable
.If you have ever wondered about:
-why, in movies and on TV, Jews and their religion are portrayed in the most flattering terms. Although the more devout of them share many of the same intolerances as the Taleban do..female submissiveness, pork vilification, sabbath restrictions, co-religious marriage promotion etc....
-why every series from Friends and Seinfeld...
Published 3 months ago by Devil's Advocate

versus
5 of 28 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Revisionist propaganda for the extreme right wing.....
This was purchased for a friend who had asked for it as a gift.

I was lent the book to read and although I was aware of the writer beforehand, I approached the book with an open mind.

This book fails on quite a few levels, firstly the book claims to be scientific in it's study, though fails on the very basic criteria of what science is.

If...
Published on 15 Jan. 2013 by Mr. Stephen Jones


Most Helpful First | Newest First

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Saying the Unsayable, 7 Nov. 2014
By 
Devil's Advocate (Over your shoulder!) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Paperback)
.If you have ever wondered about:
-why, in movies and on TV, Jews and their religion are portrayed in the most flattering terms. Although the more devout of them share many of the same intolerances as the Taleban do..female submissiveness, pork vilification, sabbath restrictions, co-religious marriage promotion etc....
-why every series from Friends and Seinfeld to Frasier has learned, noble Jewish characters who extol their religion while Christianity rarely gets a look-in unless as a subject of mockery..
-why small town USA is demonised as backward and bigotted (Bad Day at Blackrock, Breakdown, U-Turn, Texas Chainsaw Massacre etc. etc.)when it actually represents the essence of the generous American spirit...
-why three generations later, Germans are still being vilified on screen as a people (coming soon to your screens "Dirty Inglorious Bastards" from Tarantino featuring Germans being beaten to death with a baseball bat...anyone remember "The Dirty Dozen" featuring a blonde German wife being stabbed to death while her fellow women are later doused with petrol and incinerated?)...
-why the Holocaust is represented as a sacred icon that may only be debated at risk of imprisonment. Other holocausts don't get capital letters and rarely a cinematic mention...
-why the early Bolshevik leadership in the USSR was predominantly Jewish (Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev...even Lenin was part Jewish) as were the post-WW2 leaderships of Poland and Hungary...
-why the Hollywood Seven in the McCarthy years were principally Jewish
-why many of the '60s radicals were Jews; Abe Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Allan Ginsberg...etc...as were both organisers of Woodstock!!
-why Western culture (Anglo-Saxon and Christian) has been under sustained attack (or critique) from urban intellectuals since the '50s. The Boas school of Cultural Critique, The Frankfurt School of Social Research, even Freud's attack on sexual "repression" within Christian homes...
-the media's obsession with and promulgation of multi-culturism and homosexuality over the beliefs and wishes of the majority of Western citizens...
-the Democratic Party stance on immigration and the cross-party Jewish support for open borders...
-the unremarked on and hypocritical policies of Israel to ethnically cleanse its Arab population...even after the last Gaza outrage where 1,000 Palestinians in one week died at the hands of Israel 72% of Americans were recently polled as having a positive view of Israel...then you must read this book.
The basic tenet of the book is straightforward: while there is no "conspiracy" among Jews to control the media or espouse left-wing causes, nevertheless the resonant memory of the Holocaust and Jewish pogroms throughout history has instinctively driven Jews to support causes and schools of thought that attack the dominant non-Jewish host culture.
Only in a multi-cultural, quasi-Marxist (also a Jew!!)egalitarian society will Jews finally not stand out and thus be safe from persecution. Instead of attacking the West head-on Jews have been prominent in movements that vilify and discredit the major canons of Western civilisation, ie. Christianity, the family, the very ethnic make-up of the societies themselves.
All of this has been done in the hypocrytical light of Israel's and Judaism's obstinate and unrepentant unwillingness to "mix in" or indeed to be criticised in any shape or form.Jews are by no means the only people involved in these movements and McDonald is clear that there is no "conspiracy" per se. However, Jews are prominent within the various movements discussed.
Don't expect an easy read, sentences such as "Evolutionary conceptualizations of ethnocentrism emphasize the utility of ethnocentrism in group competition" (p.xxiv) or how about "The dynamic contextualist perspective conceptualizes development as a dialectical interaction between organism and environment"(p.40)!!!!!!!!That kind of writing had me reaching for the whiskey to numb the pain.
In fact, important as the message of the book is, its opaque dissertationesque style of writing is its biggest disappointment.
I mean, what is the point of crafting such a potentially incendiary message and then burying it in verbage that only the most persistent of readers will persevere through? That is why it only gets four stars.
There has been surprisingly little outrage about this book. Most probably those who are its targets are clever enough to know that Joe Sixpack is going to tune out before he's even read the contents page.Sad but true. For those of you of sterner intellectual mettle don't miss this read. It will shape your thinking for the rest of your life.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


20 of 22 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Innovative view of judaism and anti-semitism, 7 April 2011
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Paperback)
This fascinating book applies the author's ground-breaking 'evolutionary' analysis of Judaism and Anti-Semitism to twentieth century intellectual history, with a particular focus on the public life of America. I found it best explored in conjunction with the two previous books in the series that develop the presuppositions on consciousness of ethnic interests deployed in this book. These are: A People That Shall Dwell Alone (on Judaism) and Separation and Its Discontents (which develops a challenging and original, reactive theory of 'anti-semitism' on the basis of social identity theory and evolutionary psychology). There is certainly a danger of naively uncritical readings of this book by those who read it in isolation.

MacDonald is a philosophy graduate and can talk with quiet authority about the Jewish intellectual movements he criticises. These are: 'social anthropology'; psychoanalysis and the 'Frankfurt school' of 'critical theory'. The book ends with an attack on the support these theories give to the open door immigration policy of the USA since 1965 that the author considers disastrous for the America he knows and loves. He perhaps does not address enough the factors in 'gentile' society that facilitated the transition from the 1950s to the 1960s' 'culture of critique'. If so, he then overrates the Jewish contribution and responsibility, though this was certainly considerable. To my mind, his nostalgia for the 1950s is overdone.

Many of the authors contentions are beyond the pale of much contemporary academic discourse and he has shown an admirable personal courage in advocating his views in the face of ill-informed dismissal and personal denigration. His opposition to non-European immigration is principled, but he has some way to go to establishing a viable political platform on the basis of his Darwinist ideas. He should certainly be read by all interested in American academia and modernity in general, but with a critical eye.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


15 of 17 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Evolutionary Psychology Applied to History, 15 Nov. 2010
By 
F. Collier (Edinburgh, UK) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Paperback)
A detailed and scholarly description of aspects of Western history from a Sociobiolological perspective, with particular reference to the Jewish role in that history.

Readers who have found certain questions raised by modern history difficult to answer will find this book very enlightening.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


35 of 41 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Essential to understand immigration and other issues, 24 Aug. 2010
By 
Rerevisionist (Manchester, England) - See all my reviews
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Paperback)
Fascinating book. It omits quite a bit of material, but I give it five stars for its groundbreaking nature.

A word to Britons: this book is almost entirely USA-based. There are per head far more Jews in the USA than in England, Ireland, France, Russia and other countries. What he says may seem strange, or over-emphasised, in Europe. But it is of great importance in understanding such things as the ludicrously undemocratic immigration policy of Britain and other countries. If you're unaware of the issues, which is quite likely in view of the censorship of all media, it's as good a book as any for exploration.

MacDonald concentrates on two types of movements: political ones (usually publicised and well-known though the Jewish element was secretish), and intellectual - fought out in universities and by departmental social science journals. The first type is usually described as 'left' by Americans. For some reason the US never had a proper socialist movement, possibly because it was from the start taken over by Jews, who didn't want general alleviation of poverty - they wanted it for themselves only. This includes support for the coup in Russia after the First World War and the consequent mass-murder, financed and organised by Jews. This is the root of the difference between 'Reds' and socialists, which to this day is intentionally confused. US 1960s radicals were mainly Jewish - there was mass murder in Vietnam, organised by Kissinger, but this seems to have been regarded as unimportant - it was only the pro-Jewish radicalism that appealed to them. MacDonald isn't good on feminism, which in the US also was largely Jewish.

MacDonald is most sound on intellectual movements, unsurprisingly as he is himself an academic, accustomed to the atmosphere of lectures, syllabuses, professors, exams, textbooks and all the rest of it. The Culture of Critique means simply enough the Jewish attack on all aspects of 'gentile' life. The academic topics referred to in detail are psychoanalysis (mainly of course Freud), anthropology (mainly someone called Boas, not well-known in Britain - who spent his life trying to show that races don't exist, apart of course from Jews), the Frankfurt School (what's loosely called 'Marxism', although there's little of Marx in it). MacDonald's long chapter on the Frankfurt School largely deals with The Authoritarian Personality by Adorno and others. This chapter (and the one following) deal with 'Pathologization of Gentile Group Allegiances' - if you wonder why there seems a positive push against the family, why white abortions are pushed while black immigration is encouraged, why TV programmes show family breakdowns, why freaky sex is promoted - these chapters wil help you find the reason.

MacDonald clearly identifies Jews - for example, Derrida, Hofstadter, Freud - which helps clear away a certain amount of fog. He clarifies why their writing style is often absurdly opaque - because of course they can't say what they really mean, or alternatively they are being boosted and hyped.

MacDonald's first journal article was dated 1983; eleven years later his book on Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy was published. MacDonald's novelty is combining theories of evolution of human behaviour - 'five factors' - with facts about Jews. To illustrate, the new preface (written after 9/11) has an account of Europe genetically developing on a less tribal basis than herders and other narrow self-defined groups. His analysis relies heavily on rather vague things like 'individualism', but at any rate it's in principle testable or at least discussable in detail. In particular, he regards modern US and Europe as not well adapted to withstand attacks by small united groups.

The most important single point he makes in my opinion is the the relentless support, promotion and propagandisation by Jewish groups for immigration, a constant since 1924, and ending with the 1965 Immigration Act in the USA. (Very similar events occurred in Britain). At first only Jewish immigrants were regarded as important by this movement: there was of course no pressure to import Ukrainians starved by Jews, or Indians in famine, impoverished Filipinos, Chinese peasant attacked by the Japanese, and so on. The more modern wholesale importation seems to have been suggested fairly slowly and of course secretly. Thus the British so-called 'Labour' party's Jack Straw (real name Jacob Strawinski) secretly decided in 2000 to flood Britain with immigrants. 'Labour' has been funded by Jews and its level of corruption has increased correspondingly to the present state where only about one white in ten votes for it.

There are of course counter-attack mechanisms, such as the 1920s-coined 'anti-Semitism' which of course MacDonald was subjected to, to his annoyance, since he was dealing with an abstract question of population genetics and competition.

The present volume has a preface which updates the book - this new preface mostly consists of journal reviews and disputes, summaries of books published on the topic since 1998, and some media stories including of course 9/11. The Muslim world, the Black Book of Communism, fanatics like Norman Podhoretz, an account of Charles Lindbergh - 'greeted with a torrent of abuse and hatred unparalleled for a mainstream public figure in American history', long and detailed account of ownership of the movie industry and other media, and so on, including attempts to censor Internet. Someone called Joseph Bendersky's 2000 book The "Jewish Threat" provides an account of a new hostile elite, according to MacDonald; an elite with a rather ridiculous sense of superiority. Quite a lot of the introduction looks at the 'north Eurasian and circumpolar culture area' and its probable evolutionary effects. He gives an explanation of the way self-criticism is exploited by Jews, and has resulted in the present situation. This is well worth reading, but too long to be summarised here. Note that he does not explore the question of bribery or violence against 'out group members' although these are significant in Jewish activity. In Britain at present Ken Livingstone and MPs, and UAF thugs, illustrate those types.

Criticisms: there are many parts of the academic world which are unexamined. (1) History - very obviously there are censorship issues regarding Jewish influences. (2) Economics - I don't think any economics textbooks deal with the issue of paper money or its present Fed/Bank of England monopoly. Arguably, this is the most important single theoretical issue of all. At present Jewish groups actually get paid to organise printing of money. For example Soros in his currency deals is part of a small clique that can virtually print money at will. Unsurprising therefore that he and others like him manage to make money from the system! Similarly MacDonald does not explre such questions as large-scale fraud, and whether depressions and crises are artificially generated. (3) Law - MacDonald mentions the US Supreme Court but omits pressure and funding groups - NAACP, Southern Poverty Law Centre etc. (4) Science. MacDonald mentions Einstein - the whole issue of fraudulent and corrupt science is, understandably, outside his range, though he does discuss mutual promotion in science and literature - in which members of the closed group publicise other members. Incidentally he doesn't list Khazars in his index, nor does he show any doubts re 'Holocaust' and 9/11.

There are or were at one time plenty of small, energetic, fanatical groups - Plymouth Brethren, Samurai, the Scotch, Italian bankers, the Romanovs, Spaniards, Jesuits, Haitians, Protestants, Prussians etc etc. MacDonald does not I think tackle the question of: why Jews? The best guess, or at least my guess, is domination of legally-enforced paper money. If this ceased to be controlled by an undemocratic cult, they presumably would be just another fanatical group.

If you want to understand the modern world, in particular the USA, this book is an important part of the jigsaw. Incidentally, part of the counter-attack is the suggestion his book is hard to read. (The same thing was said of Arthur Butz's book). It isn't - the prose is perfectly OK. But it's slighly complicated because there are three specialist vocabularies - evolutionary, technical Jewish, and political/social science. If you can work out the meanings of 'They are groups with high levels of ooperation with strangers than with extended family members', 'African Americans are disproportionately characterized by low-investment, high-fertility parenting', 'halachic', 'advocate very high levelsof immigration from all parts of the world, so that the U.S. will become ... the world's first "Universal Nation."' - then you'll be OK.

My copy, and I presume this applies in the USA too, is a somewhat pricy print-on-demand paperback, and it has to be said the book would be better with more differentiation between typefaces - the index does not have smaller print for subtopics, for instance. My copy has [...] on the cover, a website which seems not to exist. Such are the typical by-products of censorship!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars, 30 Sept. 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Paperback)
Excellent, no other comment
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Four Stars, 28 July 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Paperback)
Informative well written
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 28 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Revisionist propaganda for the extreme right wing....., 15 Jan. 2013
By 
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Paperback)
This was purchased for a friend who had asked for it as a gift.

I was lent the book to read and although I was aware of the writer beforehand, I approached the book with an open mind.

This book fails on quite a few levels, firstly the book claims to be scientific in it's study, though fails on the very basic criteria of what science is.

If you have any understanding of European and US history then the book falls down hard, in it's pursuit of blaming everything on Jews it omits critical points in history as if they did not happen. An example of this is the claim that the Jews brought the US into WWII on there own, no mention of Churchill or anyone else.

This book in conclusion serves a purpose for the right wing agenda, but anyone with average knowledge of history will see it as a deeply flawed hate filled book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Only search this product's reviews