Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle  Learn more Countdown to Prime Day Shop now Shop now


Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 26 July 1999
- look no further! This is one of the more interesting books on British politics I have read. It has changed my view on Chamberlain, who comes out as a much stronger figure than historians normally portray - many writers who are keen on Churchill (as the author clearly is) tend to paint Chamberlain as a two dimensional cartoon character. And to generalise yet again, unlike most books on recent British political history this one is actually quite fun to read - there are some amusing anecdotes and withering asides which I hadnt come across before.
0Comment|5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 June 2009
I know very little about British Governments of the 1920's and 30's. This book provides quite a run through the period, contrasting the career paths of Chamberlain and Churchill, the former on the up escalator, the latter down. That being said, Churchill is dealt with very sympathetically, and as we know ultimately becomes immortal.
What comes across is Churchill's sheer self-belief, allied to a constant hunt for any opportunity to get back into cabinet through the 1930's. This self-belief ultimately was of service to the nation in his absolute refusal to negotiate with Hitler in the darkest days of 1940, when, unbelievably France had collapsed and the British Army had had most of its equipment captured. The power of Stewarts description of the debates in the House of Commons really enliven this book. Just read this

" This is only the beginning of the reckoning. This is only the first sip, the first foretaste of a bitter cup which will be proffered to us year by year unless by a surprise recovery of moral health and martial vigour, we arise again and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time"

This is Churchill after Hitler turned his back on the lenient strictures of the Munich agreement. It bellows through history, doesn't it?

Or Duff Cooper's resignation speech following Munich

"one great power should not be allowed, in disregard of treaty obligations, of laws of nations and the decrees of morality, to dominate by brute force the Continent of Europe. For that principle we fought against Napoleon Buonaparte, and against Louis XIV of France and Phillip II of Spain. For this principle we must ever be prepared to fight, for on the day when we are not prepared to fight for it we must forfeit our Empire, our liberties and our Independence"

It's Shakespearian.

That being said the book shows the pragmatic rise of Baldwin and Chamberlain through the 1920's and 30's, it is entirely possible to sympathize with the revulsion towards another European war and guilt about the terms of Versailles imposed on Germany which culminated in Chamberlain's abandoning of the Czech's as people `far away of whom we know nothing'.

Stewart advances the case that if England and France had been willing to go to war over Czechoslovakia in 1938, Germany would have had to fight in the South and West simultaneously and would not have had the Hitler-Stalin pact, therefore could not be sure of its Eastern Frontier and, ultimately, would have been in a much worse position than turned out to be the case in 1939/40. There is some interesting mention, not followed through, of the economic burden that rearmament placed on the German economy, and its chronic lack of natural resources - oil and iron ore specifically - in the early years of the war.

The book casts interesting light on the events following the negotiation of Irish independence - my main knowledge of this was that it sparked the Irish Civil War which resulted in the deaths of two of the Irish negotiation team. The British negotiators did not fair well either - the Conservatives revolted, deposing the leaders who had been Treaty negotiators (Churchcill, Austen Chamberlain) putting Baldwin in charge.
The book is queasy about Baldwin, he was such a poor Chancellor that his own Prime Minister (Bonar-Law) wrote anonymously to the Times to complain about him - this has the whiff of a tall-tale. He is portrayed as indolent, indecisive and overly-driven by public opinion. Yet it has an interesting twist on the Abdication Crisis, telling us that Baldwin rushed King Edward into an Abdication, because of personal animus. Perhaps.
A significant portion of the book spent on the failed attempts to limit the march towards Indian independence - which is seen in the light of the `mistakes' made with the Irish. Churchill's attitude to this is seen as futile, an example of his poor political judgement rightly causing his wilderness years. The book takes a different view, showing that the policy - effectively setting up an elected body, in which the various representatives would cancel each other's views out - was doomed from the start.

Chamberlain comes across as a cold, decent and ultimately tragic figure. Son of a famous father (Joe);younger half-brother of Austen, of whom great things were expected, he was meticulous, dedicated, an excellent number two. He seems to have been politically astute, never taking a position which could lead to his downfall, through the thirties he was always formally supportive of Baldwin, yet positioned to succeed him should he fail. Yet when he succeeds to the premiership, he implements a policy very much in line with the British public's aversion to a European War, protects the Empire as much as possible and yet ends up on the wrong side of history.

I found the book very enlightening on a period I knew very little about. The writing, while academic, is clear and even pacy at times. One minor fault I found was its references to contemporary events - the book was published in 1999, and references to John Major's difficulties in government, are, at this remove, a bit esoteric. With this small caveat I would recommend the book highly.
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 July 1999
This book, despite it's academic subject, gives a gripping and exciting account of the relationship between Churchill and Chamberlain in the context of 1930s politics. Graham Stewart has an excellent literary style, and is obviously extremely knowledgeable on the subject. I would heartily recommend this to anyone with even a passing interest in politics, history or biography.
0Comment|4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 24 June 2010
Excellent reading! An indepth study of Chamberlain and Churchill and their struggle for the supremacy of the Conservative party. I loved it! I couldn't put down it. Buy it! Borrow it! Read it!
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 31 July 2009
Burying Caesar by Graham Stewart is a very good book about a pivotal era in British politics as the problems caused by the First World War, then the Great Depression and finally the rise of Facism put huge pressures on the United Kingdom and the Conservative Party. It is a very well written book which has a good pace and is informative and at times opinionated. The book itself focuses on much more then the two protaganists mentioned in the title but does still present a compelling story of the fortunes of and the relationship between Churchill and Chamberlain. Overall a very good book and well worth reading to understand the careers of these two major political figures and also as a reappraisal of the era.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 6 May 2011
A riveting tour through the political contortions of the 30's, marred only by the author's use of "pence in the pound" as an ambiguous paraphrase for percent, oblivious to the fact there were 240 pence to the pound at the time.
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 April 2016
:-)
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)