Shop now Shop now Shop now Up to 70% off Fashion Shop All Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Learn More Amazon Pantry Food & Drink Beauty Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars4
4.5 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Snyder opens with a short section describing the known history of Britain in the 4th century up to about 410. The second section begins with a discussion of the literary evidence available for 400-600, leading into a series of chapters discussing the meaning of terms used in the literature: 'Britannia', 'patria', 'Britanni', 'cives', 'reges', 'tyranni' and others.

Section three considers the archaeology, before section four supposedly synthesises the previous two sections. Personally I totally failed to see the argument presented, if indeed there was one. Snyder declares himself in sympathy with the "positivists" trying to reconstruct some sort of detail as opposed to the "reductionists" who say that nothing can be said for certain, but I must have missed his conclusions altogether.

He seems as far as I can ascertain to think that the Britons threw off Roman government (so in agreement for example with Jones' The End of Roman Britain); that urban life continued in many towns (thus in agreement with Dark's Britain and the End of the Roman Empire and White's Britannia Prima: The Romans in the West of Britain and against Esmonde Cleary's The Ending of Roman Britain and Faulkner's The Decline and Fall of Roman Britain); that despite political fragmentation Britons had a sense of Britishness (as against Laycock's Britannia - The Failed State: Tribal Conflict and the End of Roman Britain and Warlords: The Struggle for Power in Post-Roman Britain); but it all seems a bit vague.

Packed with information and therefore useful for students of the period, but too fuzzy in its conclusions for me to rate it highly.
0Comment3 of 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 12 September 2000
Age of Tyrants is perhaps the best book currently available on the history of the Post-Roman Britons up to the year AD600. Looking at the remaining historical documents and the archaeology of the period, Chris Snyder builds a vivid picture of society and politics of this often misunderstood or misrepresented age. Avoiding the trap of falling into the great Arthurian debate ("did he or did he not exist?"), this book presents far newer research than many of the other available titles on this subject. Although maybe not as broad in scope as Leslie Alcock's Age of Arthur, which is the book that all others on post-Roman Britain should be judged by, Age of Tyrants concentrates on the Britons and does an excellent job of putting them into their historical context. I recommend this book to anyone interested in post-Roman Britain; the author has attempted to paint a realistic picture of life as a Briton between AD400-600, as opposed to making the few known facts fit his own theory about the 'true Arthur'.
11 comment16 of 19 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 24 November 2003
An interesting perspective on 5-7th Century 'British' activities, free of the common Anglo-Saxon "attitude" that sees this period as one of the establishment of A-S 'Kingdoms'. Instead the author looks at the creation of 'British' polities and demonstrates that their inherent instability and competiveness led to a form of mutually-assured destruction. The strife at Catterick remains central to the author's primary contention as noted here, and his analysis of Y Gododdin remains markedly at variance with current orthodoxies.
A very interesting an stimulating read for the lay specialist.
0Comment6 of 7 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
VINE VOICEon 21 May 2003
So much of what is written about the period 400-600AD focuses on whether or not King Arthur and his merry bad of knights ever lived in downtown Camelot. A lot of what is written is lovely and romantic and if it isn't true -- then it ought to be, as Winston Curchill once said.


It doesn't always help if one is trying to grope towards some kind of understanding of the process by which Late- and Post-Roman Britain ended its links with Rome, and how it came to be Anglo-Saxon England. Which is where Age of Tyrants comes in.
It is destined to beomce the standard work on this period, and rightly so.

All the old questions: Continuity or change, immigration or elite-takeover are still there for the asking.

Hopefully DNA analysis should eventually begin to help us sort some of them out, but what Snyder also does is point out the sometimes woeful state of cataloging and publication by archaeologists, not helped by lack of funds devoted to this. This means that we aren't always able to interrogate the data we do have properly - never mind go looking for more sites to dig up.
11 comment4 of 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse