Customer Reviews


4 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Accurate and comprehensive
A very good appraisal of how Labour has and hasn't delivered in the past 8 years. Generally Labour's achievements are measured against it's own promises rather than the Authors' wishes which makes for a very objective and infomative assessment.
Published on 26 Sep 2005

versus
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars News, a tool of corrupted government, rehashed by hacks, to get votes
005. Obviously Published to promote 'Labour'.

This book is extraordinarily bad. Everything in it, from the selection of chapter heading to the content, is simply rehashed short-term 'news', itself determined by the censoring policies of civil servants, editors, the BBC, and the rest of the shambolic half-educated phonies who front for real power. There is...
Published on 23 Jun 2009 by Rerevisionist


Most Helpful First | Newest First

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars News, a tool of corrupted government, rehashed by hacks, to get votes, 23 Jun 2009
By 
Rerevisionist (Manchester, England) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Better or Worse?: Has Labour Delivered? (Paperback)
005. Obviously Published to promote 'Labour'.

This book is extraordinarily bad. Everything in it, from the selection of chapter heading to the content, is simply rehashed short-term 'news', itself determined by the censoring policies of civil servants, editors, the BBC, and the rest of the shambolic half-educated phonies who front for real power. There is nothing long-term, nothing wise, nothing that involves planning or allowing for remote consequences. Everything is unelected placemen (only a few years later it's hard to remember who they were), fragmentary statistics, a small standardised official vocabulary supplemented by newly made-up phrases - 'liberal', '9/11', 'Taliban', 'galvanising vision', 'basic skills', 'communities', 'localism', 'devolution', 'governance', 'human rights' ... What all these things have in common is taking the official version and feeding it back to the suckers. The only amusing part is the way the authors try to liven up their rubbish, usually with mixed metaphors - there's a comic passage about snakes and ladders, based on ''Schools minister David Miliband' which is typical of the nauseating writing style.

What's omitted is: let's try to list them: wider aspects of war; what was the real object? Britain's legal system: how much is arranged as a money-making scheme? Immigrant violence: why is it systematically concealed? The 'Joint Tenancy' arrangement by which immigrants, even phony asylum seekers, are housed before locals? (By John Prescott's son, for example). What about teaching - is it deliberately dumbed down? Could anybody have ever been serious about 50% attending university? Fake colleges? Why are public schools left alone despite supposed egalitarianism? What about the Bank of England? And investment in the hands of a tiny number of fund managers? Energy and power stations? Persistent residues from pesticides? Selling off of Britain's assets - and Blair's deliberate Clause 4 removal to allow this? EU and its attempt to take over? Population numbers in the third world? Support for genocide in the third world?

2008, fast forward three years, to another book by Toynbee: to quote from Amazon review: 'suddenly Toynbee is talking about a totally different and unrecognisable country. Given that she is a famed New Labour luvvie, her indictment of modern Britain is an indictment of New Labour's record and by extension, is an indictment of Toynbee and her ilk.'
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Accurate and comprehensive, 26 Sep 2005
By A Customer
This review is from: Better or Worse?: Has Labour Delivered? (Paperback)
A very good appraisal of how Labour has and hasn't delivered in the past 8 years. Generally Labour's achievements are measured against it's own promises rather than the Authors' wishes which makes for a very objective and infomative assessment.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Candid Friend, 18 Sep 2008
This review is from: Better or Worse?: Has Labour Delivered? (Paperback)
The reason this book is so good is because it would be easy to assume that two of Britains best centre left journalists would be so keen for the Labour Party to stay in the ascendency and get handsomely re-elected that particularly in election year a fawning uncritical book worthy of the worst of toadies would be the result.Absolutely NOT!Polly Toynbee and David Walker act as critical friends ,giving labour credit where credit is due ,regardless of whether or not public opinion or media sentiment is prepared to do the same.As is usual with their books evidence is key.Nothing is argued for or against without it first having been rooted in a strong evidence base.Progress on child poverty and NHS improvement are some of the improvements acknowledged.
However when neccesary the Labour Government is pulled up short for its timidity and lack of ambition at a time when Labour is in a historically unique position to advance the progressive and social justice agenda.Any hint of squandering this golden opportunity is quite rightly scorned by the authors.Fair but firm is how their style is best summed up!
Metaphorically speaking Polly Toynbee and David Walker remind me in this book of the wise owl in a pub-the voice of reason standing at the bar who ever so gently but determindly corrects the drunk who knows everything about how little the government has done for the country and what a useless waste of space they all our at one end of the bar and tempers the enthuiasm and exuberance of the drunk at the other end of the bar who thinks their party of choice has done everything right.They make good ringmasters between the two opposing views of the arguing drunks by calmly and clearly explaining the reality of what the evidence shows!Thats this excellent book in a nutshell.A fair and well balanced assesment of New Labour in power.Worth a read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 6 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The truth, 11 Aug 2005
This review is from: Better or Worse?: Has Labour Delivered? (Paperback)
It's never easy to fairly assess the Government of the day, when you have to take into account so many different policies, with the accompanying views, lies, scandals and hyperbole.
This Government seems to have been attacked more than any other, probably because so much was expected, and seemingly they have failed to deliver.
Then you read Polly Toynbee's excellent book and you start to see how much has actually been accomplished in Blair's 8 years in charge. This is a highly-detailed and objective analysis of what the Labour Government set out to do in its two manifestos, what perhaps needed to be done outside these, and how the reality matches up to the objectives. In some cases they have failed, in others they have delivered exactly what they said they would, but whatever your view, it's tremendously useful to have this kind of exhaustive review at your side when you think about your vote.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Better or Worse?: Has Labour Delivered?
Better or Worse?: Has Labour Delivered? by David Walker (Paperback - 7 Feb 2005)
£12.99
In stock
Add to basket Add to wishlist
Only search this product's reviews