Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
3.8 out of 5 stars
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

HALL OF FAMEon 6 December 2005
Paul Davies, a professor of theoretical physics, has written extensively both for the scientific and the popular audiences on topics of current interest in physics and cosmology. In particular, he concentrates on issues to do with quantum theories, relativity and beginning/end of the universe issues.
In his book 'God and the New Physics', Davies continues a new tradition in which physicists particularly and scientists more generally write about their fields in philosophical, nearly theological terms discussing first causes, ultimate meanings, and the place of God and humanity in the overall scheme of the universe. Our understanding of the universe has changed dramatically in the last century, having been a fairly stable image for the past several hundred years. This has understandably made the philosophic and anthropomorphic considerations of the universe change dramatically as well.
'Science and religion represent two great systems of human thought. For the majority of people on our planet, religion is the predominant influence over the conduct of their affairs. When science impinges on their lives, it does so not at the intellectual level, but practically, through technology.'
Davies explores first the idea of genesis of the universe, exploring the intricacies of the big bang theory. This is a theory that has difficulties philosophically, that a purely scientific approach does not have an answer to, not least of which because it isn't asking the same question. Essentially, according to the big bang theory, the universe began as a singularity, essentially an infinitely small point from which all space and time (and all that is in it) emerged in an explosion-like phenomenon. Davies explores problems associated with conventional thinking around this unconventional theory -- what is the first event? what is the first event after the big bang? what is the purpose? what is the cause?
It is a bizarre twist of quantum theories that causes and effects are not neatly, logically arranged along timelines which we have become accustomed to. Thus, can the universe be considered to be self-causing?
'The fact that modern cosmology has provided hard physical evidence for the creation is a matter of great satisfaction to religious thinkers. However, it is not enough that a creation simply occurred. The Bible tells us that God created the universe. Can science throw any light at all on what caused the big bang?'
Alas -- even with exotic causality strains and quantum mechanisms which may remove the need for a first cause (as Davies tends to argue, using modern science essentially to refute already largely-refuted cosmological arguments for the existence of God), it does not adequately explain why there is a universe at all, that would have as part of its nature not needing a first-cause.
In the course of his discussion of the ideas of theoretical physics and traditional religious views, Davies explores the mind/matter connexion, the nature and direction of time, the scientific and philosophic issues around free will and determinism, and the idea of what nature truly is (and isn't).
Near the end of the book, Davies recaps the argument thus far:
'In spite of the spectacular success of modern science, it would be foolish to suppose that the fundamental questions concerning the existence of God, the purpose of the universe, or the role of mankind in the natural and supernatural scheme has been answered by these advances. Indeed, scientists themselves have a wide range of religious beliefs.'
There are no easy answers here. This book is not intended to settle anything, but rather to help clarify the issues in the debate, particularly in an era where there is as much misconception over what modern science really means as there is over what religious interpretations really mean. This is not a book for the intellectually timid. There is a presumption of scientific literacy in all of Davies' work; one needn't be a rocket scientist (or theoretical physicist), but those intimidated at basic algebra will most likely not benefit from this volume.
'I am sometimes asked whether the insight which physicists have gained into the inner workings of nature through the study of fundamental processes throws any light on the nature of God's plan for the universe, or reveals the struggle between good and evil. It does not. There is nothing good or evil about the way quarks are united into protons and neutrons, or the absorption and emission of quanta, the bending of spacetime by matter, the abstract symmetries that unite the fundamental particles, and so on.'
That having been said, many of the philosophical and theological questions remain unanswered, but now have a new element to be considered. Davies' work helps to reframe questions.
11 comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 23 June 1999
Absolutely wonderful explananation of modern physics. Davies does a fine job of introducing the many points of recent revolutions in that area. Now the philosophy/thoelogy, that is not so good. The man is a physicist and should stay one, for his arguments and analysis in general is lacking. It is not his conclusions that bother me, it is more like his thinking leading up to them. As an avid reader of physics, and a current philosophy student, I feel a much better job could have been done in bringing these two areas together. All in all, a good book, I enjoyed it. A subject that deserves further exploration and stronger, fuller analysis.
11 comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 30 April 1999
This book does what good books do; it raises your ignorance to a higher level. Davies uses quantum physics and some bio-chemistry to explore topics such as free will, the soul, and the origin (and end) of life in a thoroughly readable way.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 26 March 1999
I found this book fascinating. Although Davies states that 'Science may offer a surer path to God that Religion' he states this only because science with its rational approach to the subject may more readily be accepted by some than by faith. Davies does, however, finally state that although the universe may have been created in the 'Big Bang' by itself without any so-called 'Prime Mover'; that is, if quantum gravity acts in the manner that quantum physics works at the atomic level. Given this, he then makes the statement that the mathematics that describe the universe must have been in place for this to occur. Davies is of the same mind as Einstein here in that God would be necessary to create the mathematics that created the universe.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 13 April 1999
Someone recommended this book to me, and I gave it a read, but found that the author was more interested in worshiping physics than in addressing the relationship between the "new" physics and God. I was especially disappointed in the mock conversation the author staged. It did not do much to carry his point when the conversations were obviously slanted in a manner to present physicists as totally logical and reasonable, and anyone that believes in God as an emotionally based illogical dolt. Elitism is not very flattering. I found a lot of the author's "logic" to have as many holes as the points he just got done knocking holes in himself.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 21 March 1999
I searched eagerly for this book, but was very disappointed after reading it. An earlier review suggested that this book is not for students of theology. It is not for students of physics either. The saddest commentary on this book is that it does not present a cogent discussion of the relationship between theological and physical matters either. It is poorly written and poorly presented. Despite enduring interests in both topics supposedly covered in this book, I struggled to finish it, because it was so tedious. I will avoid all books by this author and the editor of this volume in the future.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 3 April 1998
When I bought the book, I thought that it was going to deal more with the notion of proving that God exists through physics. I did not see this happening. It did deal more with the universe, time, blacks holes and many theories. I am not a physicist and about 60% of the reading was for a person who may already have had some knowledge of physics. I did learn some from the book, but it was not in the area that I was more concerned with. A good book for a student of physics, not for a student of theology.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 9 February 1999
This is a good book on how the universe may have come into being, written by a Modern Physicist. It is worth reading and now I'm convinced that 'Science may offer a surer path to God that Religion'. (I also HIGHLY recommend, 'The Dancing Wu Li masters' by Gary Zuklav.)
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)