Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
3.7 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Format: Hardcover|Change
Price:£17.99+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 20 May 2014
This is a great idea - a book about reading. There's considerable promise at the start that we're going to be taken on a journey of prose. And not just the usual prose you'd expect to read about from a literary critic, but a much more randomised version as Rose elects to read the books in a New York library on the LES - LEQ shelf. She sets herself various sensible sounding rules - she doesn't have to read the books in order; if there happen to be several books by the same author then she only has to read three of them, and so on. There's even an element of real-life drama with storms as the opening backdrop.

Indeed, there are many lovely parts. I was fascinated by her descriptions of the impact of different translations of the same book. I learnt a great deal also about the process of 'library weeding' where old books are discarded to make room for the new. Towards the end, I also loved her take on how difficult it can be for writers to create their own 'voice', while the conclusion was simply charming.

However, there were many sections I really disliked. Somehow her own voice often came across to me as that of a sneering reviewer's (which is maybe why so many professional reviewers seem to adore this book...). This is curious considering that she also writes, "Negative reviews are fun to write and fun to read, but the world doesn't need them". Even when Rose describes the books she read that she enjoyed, I found nothing to encourage me to also go and seek them out for my own shelf. She states that literary critics wrongly favour the famous and canonical and then peppers her writing with constant reference to, you guessed it, the famous and canonical. There's a whole chapter decrying the gender inequality in prose, but she compares Jodi Picoult and Jennifer Weiner to Jonathon Franzen. To me, that's almost like comparing Lee Child to Hillary Mantel. I have nothing against any of these writers (don't get me wrong, I enjoy reading them all) but in an argument about pervasive sexism in literature, I can't see how they can be considered comparable texts.

Rose is an excellent writer herself. In particular, I loved her phrase about a bad review becoming the 'death of the book baby'. This is certainly not what I'm trying to achieve here! I would suggest that if you want to expand your ideas on reading, then give this one a shot. There are parts to love: I just wish there weren't so many parts that I personally hated.
11 comment| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
The shelf wasn't quite as randomly chosen as the blurb for this book implies. The author wanted to pick a shelf which contained one classic she wanted to read and no more than five books by any one author. The shelf which went from LEQ - LES fitted her criteria and she embarked on reading the books contained on that shelf. She decided that if there were five books by a particular author then she would only undertake to read three of them. As the library she chose for her adventure in reading is a lending library she ran the risk of the shelf changing while she read but she managed to accommodate the changes.

I found it a fascinating book to read as it didn't just cover the books she read but also took a look at libraries and how they decide what to keep and what to buy in the first place. She discussed different formats of the various books and found that in some instances she found the format of the book got in the way of her enjoyment of it. If the book was very old and tatty or was printed in a very small font it was easier and much more enjoyable to read an e-book version where there was nothing to get between the reader and the text.

I particularly enjoyed the chapter on 'Phantom of the Opera' as it takes in not just the original text but film adaptations of the story as well as the musical versions. I enjoyed the author's comments on literature in translation and how the translator’s desire to over inform the reader with a plethora of footnotes and explanations can interfere with the enjoyment of the text. Nabokov apparently did this with his translation of ‘A Hero of Our Time’ and the author turned to other translations which she found she could read with much more enjoyment.

If you enjoy books about books then you will probably enjoy this one. The author writes in an easy low key style and while she makes references to other more famous authors I think she succeeded admirably in her stated aim of reading outside the perceived canon of literature as taught in schools and universities. I enjoyed the book so much that I even forgave the author her trenchant comments on mystery and crime novels – which are my particular favourites. The book contains notes and an index.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 11 October 2014
There certainly are some things to like about this book. I am not sorry I read it. A few of the discussions, sparked by books Rose read, are particularly interesting. For instance, she discusses the belief that female writers aren't taken as seriously as male writers. Surprisingly for me, I realized I hadn't really thought about that before, since I personally had never made any perceptual distinction between the two sexes as legitimate writers. But once Rose started exploring the issue, it suddenly became obvious. Thank you to Rose for that! As another example, she discusses how books are weeded, that is, how books are permanently removed from library shelves to create shelf space for new acquisitions. I suppose I must have known this happens, but how, why, the criteria used, etc, were all unknown to me. More good information! And her description of the book Gil Blas is a nicely dynamic piece of writing.

One of my criticisms of the book is the subtitle: "Adventures in Extreme Reading." I understand that in today's publishing world a book must capture a reader's attention, sometimes with such a gimmick. But I find it off-putting. Reading one shelf of books is hardly, by any stretch of the imagination, extreme. An interesting little project, perhaps, but nothing more drastic than that. As a result, the subtitle promises far more depth and drama than the book actually delivers.

Another criticism. I suppose the trend started with Julie Powell's Julia Project (cooking all recipes in Mastering the Art of French Cooking in one year). Since then, similar types of projects have sprouted like weeds for the purpose of then publishing a book about the project. Do this for a year, do that for six months, try something different for 4 weeks. Get some publicity, sign a publishing contract, and, voila, instant fame and success. Very gimmicky. This book falls somewhat within that category. And the problem with such projects, why they seem a little unsavory, is that they often use serious work created by another person/people to cobble together a quick little project for the aforementioned publicity and publishing. It is as if those project formulators can't create anything original and unique themselves, so they glom onto someone else's abilities and exploit them for personal gain. I'm not saying that Rose is exactly like that. She is very successful in her own right. But this book has the strong whiff of that trend.

Overall, the book is somewhat interesting. It doesn't really comprise a coherent whole, but if the chapters are read as separate essays rather than as related chapters in a single book, the volume makes a little more sense.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Customers also viewed these items

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.