Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle  Learn more Countdown to Prime Day Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars8
4.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
6
4 star
1
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
Format: Paperback|Change
Price:£12.99+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

VINE VOICEon 13 December 2009
History changes over time not because the facts are any different but because their interpretation does. In the case of Nazi Germany the biographies of Hitler by Alan Bullock and Joachim Fest barely mention the Holocaust. For the last thirty years, particularly since the publication of David Irving's Hitler's War in 1977, the subject has had a central role in the discussion of the history of Nazi Germany. Consequently, this collection of essays involves historiography as well as history. Adding to the former are perspectives facilitated by the reunification of Germany after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.

Kershaw concentrates on four themes. Hitler and the Final Solution; Popular opinion and the Jews; The Final Solution in Historiography; and the Uniqueness of Nazism. All are inextricably mixed in the observation that "the road to Auschwitz was built by hate, but paved with indifference". Many Germans lacked strong views about the Jews but acquiesced by virtue of latent ant-Semitism which translated into passive complicity in the genocide and moral indifference as to its meaning. In a society in which freedom of opinion was denied the extent of this complicity can only be estimated. It was to undermine this moral insensibility to the Jews' fate that was behind the determination of liberating forces to make local citizens view the product of their complicity when concentration camps were finally reached.

The role of Hitler in the Final Solution lies at the heart of revisionists' attempts to re-cast Hitler as being uninvolved in the policy for which the Nazi regime is most remembered. Kershaw deals extensively with this question, setting it in the context of Hitler's "prophecy" that Germany would go to war against the "Jewish Bolshevik" conspiracy, This "denoted the indelible link in (Hitler's) mind between war and revenge against the Jews" - the revenge being the "stab in the back" inflicted on Germany in 1918. Kershaw convincingly infers Hitler's approval for the Final Solution from a series of unminuted meetings between Hitler and Himmler in mid-July 1941, when the former authorised an extension of the activities of the Einsatzgruppen (killing squads) in the east. The Wanasee meeting of January 1942 was confirmation of what Goebbels called a "barbaric but fully deserved" judgement on the Jews.

Germany had a long tradition of anti-Semitism. This "probably did not go much further than an abstract dislike or distrust of the Jews". However, the appearance of racial anti-Semitism as an element of nationalist thinking became powerful during the late nineteenth century and it is known Hitler read the second edition of Human Hereditary Teaching and Racial Hygiene by Bauer, Fischer and Lenz before he wrote Mein Kamp. Alfred Rosenberg, Nazism's racial theorist, was influenced by the writings of Arthur de Gobineau, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, and Madison Grant. Rosenberg linked racial theories to Darwinism throughEugenics. In many cases opposition to maltreatment of Jews came from those who had an economic interest in their continuing to do business with them. Although some clerics were regular opponents of Nazi racial hatred, many expressed their opposition less vigorously than when the regime tried to Nazify their own churches.

Kershaw deals with the question of whether Nazism was unique. A J P Taylor argued that it was not but, just as the war could be traced directly to the personality of Adolph Hitler, the Nazi state could be traced to the character of the Germanic people. Race was central to Nazism in a way which did not apply to Fascism. Kershaw recognises the centrality of Hitler to an understanding of Nazism. Take away Hitler and there is no Nazism in the sense of a charismatic leader who could represent the process of "national salvation". The one man who might, Ernest Rohm, was despatched without ceremony in 1934. Kershaw concludes the uniqueness of the Nazi leadership cannot be explained by Hitler's personality alone. While latent anti-Semitism could be stirred up amongst the masses it was the lack of opposition in prominent sections of the German elites - civil service, armed forces and industry, which facilitated anti Jewish policies.

Underlying everything was the glorification of violence. Whether from the left with Georges Sorel or the right with Giacomo Marinetti, calls to violence appealed to societies in cultural flux where old values had been destroyed but new ones not yet accepted. Once these ideas were tied up with nationalism it often expressed itself as ethnic violence which, in Kershaw's view, is what makes genocide modern. The impact of nationalism provided states with a universal ideologicial reason for pogroms. "Being a Jew under Hitler, a Kulak under Stalin, an intellectual under Pol Pot, was tantamount to a death warrant." Kershaw hopes this will not be repeated in the future but the inability of human beings in political conflict to seek alternatives to war appear limited, if not impossible. Five stars.
11 comment|47 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 27 June 2012
An excellent number of essays on the topics the title of the book promises. To understand what happened it is important to start at the beginning of things. This may sound trivial but too many people start with the war and the holocaust, shake their heads and say they don't understand. It is better to start with the ideological background from the 19. century and then proceed via WW1 and the twenties to let events unfold on step at a time. Two very important primary sources are Hitler's Mein Kampf and Rosenberg's The Myth of the 20th Century.
0Comment|5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 November 2008
This collection of essays by Ian Kershaw - perhaps best known as Hitler's biographer - has already received broad and deep plaudits from both historical and political scholarly camps.

Kershaw has been among the most persistent and intuitive historians writing about the subject of Nazi Germany. This work may be added to his other definitive studies on the phenomenon of and the phenomena surrounding the Third Reich as well as, of course, his aforementioned monumental biography of Hitler. This work is a vast read which pools a number of diverse articles into one volume; it remains unified, however and is, at no point, disparate.

Kershaw is a well-established historian of the socio-political history of the Third Reich, and the causes and subsequent (and much cataloged) consequences of Nazi policy. His views have attracted much attention particularly with respect to the vexed question of how much or how little the attitudes of the German populace influenced or did not influence Nazi policy. This single volume proffers the reader a thorough, well chronicled outline both of the catastrophic damage inflicted by the Nazi leadership, as well as the prevalent views and attitudes of the 'run of the mill' German folk as what started out as the basic segregation of the Jews then hurtled headlong into dire persecution, culminating in an attempt at outright, blanket genocide.

This work is, apparently, the culmination of over thirty years of in-depth historical research on Nazi Germany by one of that era's most acclaimed historians. It also has the merit of collating many characteristic and defining aspects of Ian Kershaw's previous research on the Holocaust for the first time, making it especially useful as a one-off 'drop in' resource for a private or institutional reference library.
The book is are structured in five sections, dealing with
(Introduction)
Hitler and the Final Solution
Popular opinion and the Jews in Nazi Germany
The Final Solution in historiography
The Uniqueness of Nazism.

The can be little doubt about the quality of the research or of the 'readability of this book. Much valuable information is crammed into its 400 odd pages. This reviewer, for one, reckons that many if not all of Ian Kershaw's readers and followers will be delighted by this one!

Michael Calum Jacques (author of 1st Century Radical: the shadowy origins of the man who became known as Jesus Christ)
0Comment|20 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 June 2016
Arrived exactly as described and on time. Completely satisfied.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 24 January 2010
Ian Kershaw is the biographer of Adolf Hitler. In this collection of essays written in the past twenty years, Kershaw analyses important matters concerning Hitler, Germany and the persecution of the Jews. His essays are very well written and everybody interested in his book on Hitles should read these essays.
0Comment|5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 22 August 2010
Professor Kershaw writes eloquently about the period of history we would prefer to forget but would be fools to do so. This is a telling lesson of what humans can really do if pushed to the limit of their comfort zone and beyond.
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 7 September 2015
Part of Daughters syllabus.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 28 January 2013
having read ian Kershaws 2 Hitler volumes,i was disapointed with this.i found the style too deep and whilst the subject matter deserves gravitas,i found it difficult to get in to the book
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)