Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars interesting and more than necessary
given current concerns about cloning, human genome project etc, this book seeks to argue that in using frankenstein to form a critique of science and modern biotechnology, the real warning Shelley wants to profer has been misread. This is because, Turney argues, current understanding of Frankenstein is based on late twentieth century ideas of the novel borne through film...
Published on 29 Dec. 2000

versus
2 of 5 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars not bad; but certainly not great, either.
This was an interesting book. It tried to give you the entire history of frankenstein. This means how it afects you in every way since it was written. A nice idea, but not well written. It is long and a little boring. It is also repetitive. It reads more like a phone book, than a non-fiction literary work. I was not pleased at all. In fact, I would not purchase...
Published on 26 Mar. 1999


Most Helpful First | Newest First

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars interesting and more than necessary, 29 Dec. 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture (Hardcover)
given current concerns about cloning, human genome project etc, this book seeks to argue that in using frankenstein to form a critique of science and modern biotechnology, the real warning Shelley wants to profer has been misread. This is because, Turney argues, current understanding of Frankenstein is based on late twentieth century ideas of the novel borne through film and other entertainment media. This has altered what Frank. means. Shelley did not only warn of the scientist as overreacher and being unprepeared to meet the consequences of his actions, but how society as a whole was conditioned to reject that which was visually repugnant. Turney is more than correct to question contemporary usage of Frankenstein, and his book traces the history of how the novel has been used as a weapon by those wishing to criticise established science. Of course we must always question what is held to be steadfast, but we must not use outmoded methods to form this criticism. Indeed, if we are to mobilise Frank. then we at least owe Shelley the credit of mobilising the entirety of her warning. I'm with Turney on this one (and yes he could write more flowingly), but his thesis is commendable, of necessity and thoroughly researched.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Science, fiction, and all that is in between, revisited, 16 May 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture (Hardcover)
This book is well resarched, well written and a must for anyone interested in looking behind the mechanism by which society disarms those most strange fellows who create hypotheses, devise experiments to test them and watch with dismay how their contemporaries choose to ignore their real work in favour of more exciting versions of it. Science and fiction are not necessarily foes and "Frankenstein's Footsteps" makes this case with an avalanche of data. This is not philosophy of science, but a very enjoyable call to put our myths to a better use.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 5 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars not bad; but certainly not great, either., 26 Mar. 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture (Hardcover)
This was an interesting book. It tried to give you the entire history of frankenstein. This means how it afects you in every way since it was written. A nice idea, but not well written. It is long and a little boring. It is also repetitive. It reads more like a phone book, than a non-fiction literary work. I was not pleased at all. In fact, I would not purchase anything else by this author(Mr. Jon Turney) ever again. I thought he could have been a lot more interesting and exciting, if he had really tried.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture
Used & New from: £9.49
Add to wishlist See buying options
Only search this product's reviews