Top critical review
One person found this helpful
Excellent content but very poor editing and presentation
on 5 March 2013
The content of the two volumes is excellent. However there are a number of problems:
1. Both volumes are littered with typo's, partly because they are so text heavy
2. Vol 1 lacks a proper contents section, so it's not the easiest book to navigate. In volume 2, the contents page is located about 20 pages in for some reason, after the glossary and multiple forewords
3. In vol 1 the clinical notes sections are overinflated and as such the text has been reduced to what looks like size 8 font.
Despite these annoying issues, the books are good value overall and very comprehensive.