Customer Reviews


2 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


16 of 17 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars FIRST RATE CRITIQUE OF THE MODERN UNDERSTANDING OF CLINICAL DEPRESSION
Written by Allan Horvitz and Jerome Wakefield, both distinguished University Professors working in the USA, 'The Loss of Sadness' is a pointed and persuasively argued critique of the conflation between what the authors describe as on the one hand:- (A) 'normal' sadness/sorrow that arises in reaction to negative events/social stressors in one's life such as relationship...
Published on 30 Sep 2008 by Peter Hurst

versus
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars A profound critics towards the power of diagnosis
I bought this book as a source material for my work as an journalist and it has worked well for it. It is not too complicate or professional so an average person can follow it quite well without any problem. It gives a lots of background info about the process of developing modern psychiatry diagnosing methods.
Published on 14 Feb 2012 by Tammikari


Most Helpful First | Newest First

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars FIRST RATE CRITIQUE OF THE MODERN UNDERSTANDING OF CLINICAL DEPRESSION, 30 Sep 2008
By 
Peter Hurst "peter hurst" (wigan, england) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow Into Depressive Disorder (Hardcover)
Written by Allan Horvitz and Jerome Wakefield, both distinguished University Professors working in the USA, 'The Loss of Sadness' is a pointed and persuasively argued critique of the conflation between what the authors describe as on the one hand:- (A) 'normal' sadness/sorrow that arises in reaction to negative events/social stressors in one's life such as relationship difficulties, job losses etc and is in fact a natural response to loss and:- (B) True 'Depressive Disorder' which either has no apparent cause or is grossly disproportionate to the apparent cause and which does not remit when the person's social circumstances change, stressful situations end or simply go away with the passage of time but seems to have 'a life of it's own.'

The authors argue that the Bible of American Psychiatry, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) - which lists all the different mental disorders and sets the specific criteria for their diagnosis - has, since it's revision and major overhaul in 1980, set the stall for this erroneous conflation by dramatically inflating the number of people diagnosed with Depression (and subsequently treated with Anti-Depressants of course) through a simple change in diagnostic criteria that allowed for the first time, and in the name of diagnostic RELIABILITY, a diagnosis of Depression to be made purely on the basis of symptoms alone. In this case five symptoms from a checklist of nine and then solely for a period of two weeks.

The criteria set in place by DSM has one exclusion criteria and that is that the symptoms are not better accounted for by Bereavement, which the authors state is the 'definition's only acknowledgement that some instances of normal intense sadness might satisfy the symptomatic criteria.' The central flaw of the defintion and the central thesis of the book is that the DSM defintion of Depression fails to take into account the context in which the person's symptoms emerged and thus fails to exclude intense sadness, other than in reaction to the death of a loved one, that arises from the way human beings NATURALLY respond to major losses.

The authors therefore argue that: the exclusion criteria should be expanded to take into account of the myriad circumstances other than bereavement that triggers 'normal sadness' and that would be better categorised as social problems/problems of living. The authors emphasise a truly VALID diagnosis of Depression can only be made when the context of the person's life is taken fully into account and thus the tickbox/checklist criteria of DSM is insufficient for it's purpose.

This might just be the most important book written about Depression since Robert Burton's 'Anatomy of Melancholy' and I would urge anyone with an interest in the subject to read it and take note for the implications of their argument are far-reaching. Also recommended reading on a similiar vein is David Healy's 'The Antidepressant Era.'
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars A profound critics towards the power of diagnosis, 14 Feb 2012
This review is from: The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow Into Depressive Disorder (Hardcover)
I bought this book as a source material for my work as an journalist and it has worked well for it. It is not too complicate or professional so an average person can follow it quite well without any problem. It gives a lots of background info about the process of developing modern psychiatry diagnosing methods.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First
ARRAY(0xa7cac558)

This product

The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow Into Depressive Disorder
17.99
In stock
Add to basket Add to wishlist
Only search this product's reviews