Customer Reviews


18 Reviews
5 star:
 (7)
4 star:
 (6)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


11 of 11 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent as usual
I must agree with some of the other reviewers who note the annoying habit of Grant to use division, brigade and colonel instead of the Roman terms which of course are now in common use. Other than that Grant is an excellent translator, see for example his numerous other books on Roman history/Emperors. Thankfully, these terms are defined in an appendix.

This...
Published on 1 Dec 2009 by Frank Bierbrauer

versus
72 of 87 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Fatal flaw in translation
For all the merits of Michael Grant as a sholar and translator, it is utterly unpalatable to refer to a Roman legion as a "brigade" or a "division"; to a centurion as "company commander" or "junior staff officer"; or to a pro-consul or a legate as "governor". If one wished to read about these positions, one would naturally read books on Generals Lee, Grant or Patton! This...
Published on 1 Jun 2002 by José Saavedra


‹ Previous | 1 2 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent as usual, 1 Dec 2009
By 
Frank Bierbrauer (Manchester, Lancashire, UK) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
I must agree with some of the other reviewers who note the annoying habit of Grant to use division, brigade and colonel instead of the Roman terms which of course are now in common use. Other than that Grant is an excellent translator, see for example his numerous other books on Roman history/Emperors. Thankfully, these terms are defined in an appendix.

This book by Tacitus much like his other "Histories" approaches the subject in the same way which varies considerably from the more light hearted approach of "Agricola and the Germania". However, unlike the Histories, Tacitus does not yet give the overwhelming impression of an Empire which is degrading and falling apart at the moral seams. This impression is present strongly throughout the Histories. Instead, in this fascinating journey through the times of Tiberius, Claudius and Nero extending from the dates: 14-66 AD we are presented not only with the lives of the Emperors but also some of the knights and senators who played a role in the affairs of the time. In addition, there are numerous excerpts about events which take place on the frontier e.g. the revolt in Germania and the revenge of the Teutoburger Forest disaster and remarkably enough a very interesting account of the Royal family and trouble on the Eastern frontier with Parthia.

I am always fascinated by Tacitus's ability to make the barbarians seem like Romans, they often have Roman names and Roman weaknesses such as greed and corruption, it brings them closer to the Romans as human beings rather than alienating them. Here again we are met with the bravery and courage of the ordinary Roman soldier much as it was described by Caesar in his Gaulish Wars. The legionary has lost none of his stalwartness and stoic characteristics e.g. "The Germans were as brave as our men ..." (p 86). Tacitus speaks glowingly of Germanicus and rather disparagingly of Tiberius who he considers an emperor lacking in moral fibre. It is interesting to note his favouritism for certain people such as Germanicus and to some degree Claudius and his strong bias against both Tiberius and Nero (who no doubt deserved this).

It too is unfortunate that some of his works were lost which of course interferes with the flow of the account and interrupts the reader's concentration. Nonetheless, Tacitus is a brilliant hostorian writing in an entertaining style, in spite of his bias, thereby describing the time well rather than presenting a series of facts lacking a sense of place and culture.

Excellent as usual.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Annalistic, 21 July 2014
By 
reader 451 - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)   
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
Though I am no classicist, I have read quite a bit of original Greco-Roman history, from Thucydides to Cassius Dio, and I was looking forward to Tacitus, perhaps the most reputed Roman writer and Gibbon's favourite source. I fear however that part of Tacitus' reputation relies on his style, whose uniqueness gets lost in an English translation. Nor had I realised, firstly, that significant parts of the Annals are missing, and secondly that the book is in format a chronicle, not a history.

Covering the scandal-ridden years AD 14-66, the Annals takes the reader through the reign of Tiberius, the last years of Claudius, and most of Nero. The reign of Caligula, the early Claudius years, and the last of Nero are missing, and one must turn to Suetonius for that. That, with a few exceptions, Tacitus chose to tell his story year by year, or consulship by consulship, is meanwhile no-doubt invaluable to historians, but it makes the book more difficult to follow and less coherent to the general reader. The Annals do have an overarching theme, namely the corruption of absolute power, both among those at the top and among courtiers and aspirants. Yet as an account they are burdened with countless obscure affairs whose protagonists are hard to recognise, and by the marches and counter-marches of military campaigns whose significance is not always established. By contrast, though Thucydides also follows a loosely year-by-year structure, I found his narrative far more absorbing. I am thus only giving the Annals - shockingly, I know - four stars. At the same time, this is well worth reading and is filled with engrossing reading, such as the Germanicus campaigns or Nero's ruthless assumption of total power. And I am turning to the Tacitus Histories, covering the years AD 69-96, with unabated eagerness and anticipation.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


11 of 13 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars An in-depth coverage of Rome under first emperors, 16 July 2001
By 
Heino Viik "Heino" (Tallinn, Estonia) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
Tacitus (ca 56-120) was not only great contemporary historian but the statesman who earned both consulship (AD 97) and governorship (AD 112). So he was uniquely positioned to give us the overview of the intricate behind the scene manoeuvering and back-stabbing of the Roman politics.

The "Annals" can not give the smooth account of historical events as some parts of the original book are missing. Nevertheless the book gives us superb picture of the life of Roman rulers with all the benefits and anxieties that come with the position.

The excellent translation of Mr Michael Grant makes the book easily readable.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


72 of 87 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Fatal flaw in translation, 1 Jun 2002
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
For all the merits of Michael Grant as a sholar and translator, it is utterly unpalatable to refer to a Roman legion as a "brigade" or a "division"; to a centurion as "company commander" or "junior staff officer"; or to a pro-consul or a legate as "governor". If one wished to read about these positions, one would naturally read books on Generals Lee, Grant or Patton! This point has taken all the enjoyment out of reading a classical writer of the stature of Tacitus. I am now awaiting the publication of Professor A J Woodman's translation, due later this year, hoping that he will understand that anyone wishing to read the Annals would expect some faithfulness to the Latin terms..
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


17 of 21 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Peter, 8 Sep 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
This is a must for history students and buffs alike. In fact is is a great read full stop! Many books of this genre are dry but Tacitus takes you there and his commentary is both concise, and at times caustic and witty.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2.0 out of 5 stars Not for Academic Use, 6 Oct 2014
By 
Jamie Sinnott-Davies (Manchester, United Kingdom) - See all my reviews
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
The book offers a relatively complete and fair translation of The Annals, however, it does not include the essential paragraphing (i.e. Tacitus, Annals 14.42), which is crucial for academic use. I would not recommend this book for a graduate student, as you'll spend most of your time actually searching for the relevant pages.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Love it, 22 July 2012
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
This is pure literary gold and fascinating, if perhaps one-sided, history as well.

Tacitus takes us on an historical walk through the period of Roman history from Emperor Augustus to the death of Emperor Nero ((AD14 to AD 68). Apart from Augustus, this covers the emperors Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius and Nero. You can get the same period of history and more form Suetonius' "The Twelve Caesars" but Tacitus is a more engaging writer and seems to have access to better source material (probably the Roman Senate records or Acta Senatus).

As well as providing an excellent historical overview of a very dramatic period in Roman history, Tacitus adds a lot of colour and is unafraid of dishing the dirt on corruption, sexual foibles and scandals, family squabbles and suggestions of imperial skullduggery and murder. How much of this is true is probably not knowable but it makes for great reading.

Tacitus is a clear writer and whilst inevitably there is detail here that is meaningless to the modern casual reader, this work overall is a thrill ride not to be missed. However, if you really can't face the idea of reading the source material but want to work through the history then try Robert Graves' books I Claudius and Claudius the God, which are effectively tidied up versions of Tacitus told as a story, and brilliantly done as well.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Rome, 18 Feb 2011
By 
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
This is a good book and most enjoyable. Coupled with Seutonius and Pliny the Younger it gives us an insight into Rome as she really was! Sad that so many chapters are missing although there is nothing that can be done about this.
Two small niggles however. The style of translation is indeed somewhat dated, although it was first published in 1956 of course. The insistence on using modern day army terminology for the Roman army was an irritation I thought. We are better taught by using their own terms I say.

Tacitus is dull in comparison to Seutonius although that is because he attempts to give a year by year comment on Rome. He is less willing to reveal all the 'spicy' tales but does mention them and possibly he does indeed wish to give the impression that Rome in his day is better ruled than in the past.

Well worth a read and no student of Rome can avoid this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Good source., 9 May 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) (Paperback)
Eloquently complied by Tacitus with an interesting foreword, this is a great book for study and individual enjoyment alike. It gives a good sense of Roman society, values and beliefs.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars A detailed Diary, 19 April 2013
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Annals (Hardcover)
Bought in conjunction with Histories, (Tacitus) this is an excellent day by day account of a fascinating period in history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 2 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics)
The Annals of Imperial Rome (Classics) by Tacitus (Paperback - 26 Jun 2003)
£8.39
In stock
Add to basket Add to wishlist
Only search this product's reviews