Shop now Shop now Shop Clothing clo_fly_aw15_NA_shoes Shop All Shop All Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop Amazon Fire TV Shop now Shop Fire HD 6 Shop Kindle Paperwhite Shop now Shop Now Shop now

Customer Reviews

21
4.7 out of 5 stars
Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius
Format: PaperbackChange
Price:£13.48+Free shipping with Amazon Prime
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

53 of 54 people found the following review helpful
Wittgenstein's philosophical writings are very difficult, not only in content but also in presentation. He was always unhappy about committing his ideas to paper, and when he did so, he would set them down in a highly compressed form as numbered notes, sometimes in the form of aphorisms. When he sent the manuscript of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus to Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, neither of these considerable intellects could understand it (which didn't stop Russell from writing a foreword when it was eventually published.)

The 650 pages of Monk's magnificent biography are of course anything but compressed, and allow us to understand how Wittgenstein arrived at his conclusions. Monk writes beautifully, and he sets out the intellectual processes with the utmost clarity; but an additional and very special merit of this book is the skilful interweaving of Wittgenstein's thought and his personality.

Wittgenstein was a tortured and difficult man: intense, introspective, uncompromising, ruthlessly honest with himself and with others. He was torn between his need for solitude and his need for philosophical discussion. There was within him an immense tension between logic and mysticism. He feared madness and was frequently uncertain about the value of philosophy: he gave it up altogether for a few years after the First World War and taught for six years at elementary schools in backward rural areas of Austria. In later life he was a practising but ashamed homosexual, and for this and other reasons often felt "indecent" and suicidal. He found friendship and even elementary courtesies difficult unless there was a total identity of philosophical ideals. But his charisma was such that a number of people were devoted to him, forgave his often savage moods and harsh outbursts, and helped him: transcribing his ideas; securing him a Fellowship at Trinity College, Cambridge in 1930 and a Professorship in 1939; giving him a home in his last illness.

Monk handles with particular skill the transition between Wittgenstein's two philosophies. The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus laid down the foundations of what would become Logical Positivism, though Wittgenstein felt, from his first contact with the Vienna Logical Positivists, that his concerns were different from theirs. They were primarily concerned with the verification of propositions; but in the Tractatus Wittgenstein held that the only task for which philosophy was equipped was that of clarifying what we say by analyzing the language we use. This means examining the logical structure of language; but at the end of the process we have not said anything about the validity of the propositions that have been clarified. Whether a proposition is true or false is not ascertained by logical deductions but by whether it pictures the world as it actually is. Religious, ethical or aesthetic propositions cannot, said Wittgenstein, picture the world as it is, and it is therefore not possible for such topics to be meaningfully discussed. Therefore, in the famous last sentence of the Tractatus: "What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence."

The Vienna School and the Logical Positivists were perfectly happy to have the realm of philosophy thus circumscribed; they felt no regret about the exclusion of religion and ethics from meaningful philosophical discourse. But Wittgenstein did suffer from this loss, and felt that the Vienna School had misunderstood him. He had already told his publishers that what the Tractatus did not contain was more important than what it did contain. He had to say more about those areas which he had felt forced to pass over in silence. Religious utterance could contain a truth and a meaning which did not depend on words having a very precise meaning, but on an understanding of how religious language is used; and this understanding is gained from the experience of living a religious life.

Indeed, in the posthumously published Philosophical Investigations Wittgenstein shifted his attention from the relationship between meaning and truth to that between meaning and use. Language, in other words, is not a picture, but a tool; and it is the way we use it that shows the meaning we ascribe to it. "Don't ask for the meaning; ask for the use", Wittgenstein now proclaimed; that, he thought, would at last "showing the fly a way out of the fly-bottle." Though it is still descriptive rather than deductive, the task of philosophy is now to clarify the way words are used in different situations rather than to pin down the absolute meaning of a word to some unchanging fact in reality. To my mind it is a much richer and less arid philosophy than his earlier one; and Wittgenstein worked out all kinds of fascinating implications of his new insight: it enabled him to see how, for example, music or humour or body language can be meaningful discourse which can be understood once you know how those particular languages are being used. The second philosophy is also much easier to understand than his first - so much so, in fact, that Russell accused him of having "grown tired of serious thinking". It certainly resulted in building a bridge between the perceptions of the philosopher and the "common sense" perceptions of the ordinary man; and if in his earlier years it was the sheer abstruseness of his philosophy which made him doubt the value of what he was doing, he now worried about what at the end of the day might be the difference between philosophy and common sense. But in the end he did find a humble use for philosophy. He writes, "'What we find out in philosophy is trivial; it does not teach us new facts, only science does that. But the proper synopsis of these trivialities is enormously difficult, and has immense importance. Philosophy is in fact the synopsis of trivialities.' In philosophy we are not, like the scientist, building a house. Nor are we even laying the foundations of a house. We are merely 'tidying up a room'". (Monk, pp.298/299.)
44 commentsWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
85 of 87 people found the following review helpful
on 26 June 2000
I read this book when it first came out in hardback and was highly impressed with it. Unlike the previous reviewer, I did have a background in studying Wittgenstein - at a university which was steeped in the Wittgensteinian tradition and so came to this book already knowing a great deal of his work; I had studied almost all the published work and knew a considerable amount of biographical detail. I think the book captures brilliantly, both the central aspects of Wittgenstein's work and his character as a man. It is written in a style which is clear, accessible and serious. For anyone wanting to start studying Wittgenstein I would recommend this book. For those interested in the man, I would recommend supplementing the book with Norman Malcolm's Memoir and Rush Rhees' Recollections of Wittgenstein. For those who want to read Wittgenstein; I would start with the Blue and Brown Books before moving on to the Philosophical Investigations. Commentators on Wittgenstein? - there is a huge selection! Personally I think Hacker is the most reliable. But read this book first!
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
TOP 1000 REVIEWERon 29 December 2005
Ray Monk's biography of Wittgenstein is both very detailed and very revealing.
He shows us perfectly Wittgenstein's apparent evolution from the logical-philosophical themes of the Tractatus over language-games to the philosophy of psychology.
At first sight, the later Wittgenstein denied completely his Tractatus work and cursed 'the wretched effect that the worship of science and the scientific method had upon our whole culture'.
But that is only apparently so, because the famous last sentence of the Tractatus - 'Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent' - means that nothing can be said about the realm that was more important for him than logical theory: ethics.
The Tractatus is only a theory to preserve the purity of language.
Wittgenstein didn't sink into the morass of language. He was immediately drowned in it.
At the end of his life, Freud's work became his obsession and his comments on that work constituted an attempt to say something about what cannot be said.
The members of the 'Wiener Kreis' were completely astonished to discover that Wittgenstein was in no way a positivist like themselves.
Ray Monk gives us also a clear picture of Wittgenstein's complex and difficult character: his egotism, extreme possessiveness of his friends, fear of becoming loveless, difficulty to communicate, irascibility, mental instability ('see the madman in yourself'), his ambivalence about sexuality (a continuous battle between shame, sex and love) and his culpability. He was continuously seeking redemption for his sins, especially his pride and vanity.
This monumental biography is a very deep digging and extremely clear portrait of a controversial philosopher.
I also recommend Derek Jarman's feature film 'Wittgenstein'
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
28 of 31 people found the following review helpful
on 6 May 1999
This book forms both an excellent introduction to the theories and philosophical development of the subject, and a fascinating biography. Concepts are explained succinctly and understandably (even if like me you have no prior knowledge on the subject), as and when they arise in the chronological account of Wittgenstein's life. The biography is fascinating enough to read from cover to cover, and I never found myself tiring of the book as I originally expected from its rich content. Thoroughly recommended.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 31 March 2009
Ray Monk's biography about Wittgenstein is so gripping and well written I could hardly put it down. It gives such interesting insights into a strange intellectual life at the elite level in 20th century Europe. It also gives a not-too-hard-to-grasp insight into the philosophical problems W was so determined to solve. The reader doesn't have to be a student of analytical philosophy to understand at least what it was all about. A complementary, but lighter, read is "Wittgensteins Poker" by Edmonds and Eidinow, which focuses the differences between Wittgenstein and Carl Popper.
Strongly recommended!
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 9 August 2012
Some books do not need ratings or ephemeral ratings. They are timeless and Ray Monk is one of them. This is a man surely sent by God if there was one, a meteor that changed the course of human thinking, a kind soul, a person who cared deeply for the poor and helps many finish their tasks in their world such as writing thesis which have no connection with His field. Salute the teacher.
Insightful tour into his life time and his difficult circumstances, makes an attempt to summerise the life of the great man in a pithy manner. Some books are not for money. They help you grow and Reading Ray Monk's two books do just that they are food for the head which will help you write better to start with in what ever you do using the Wittgensteinian technique which no writing manual on earth can provide and to become a better person who thinks coherently first and then acts.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
on 11 May 2009
The positivist, analytical tradition in philosophy is what most people would associate Wittgenstein with in the first instance, provided they had heard of him in the first place. Because of his, and because of his philosophical attacks on the meaningfulness of the concepts of metaphysics, theology, spirituality and even most of logic, he is often depicted as some sort of cold, unfeeling Grand Master sitting on a pinnacle of Genius of Philosophy. But as Ray Monk's biography shows with much vigour, he was in reality a very troubled, confused, unhappy, spiritual, and above all very human person.

Making use of all the manuscripts available as well as the many correspondences of Wittgenstein, Ray Monk, a philosopher at the U of Southampton, is able to show the Wittgenstein we know as a person that one could not only sympathize with, but even pity. Because as it appears from the biography, Wittgenstein was a deeply unhappy man. His relationships were, from early life on, troubled - not as often supposed because of their bisexual nature, but rather because of his general revulsion to what he calls "sensuality" on the whole, and his tendency to flee from the people he loved. His friendships fared no better, since Wittgenstein was both fickle and dominating, unable to deal with disagreement and very strong in his views even on very minor things of daily life - which leads to repeated diary notes and comments by everyone, from Keynes to Russell, on how talking to Wittgenstein was simply too exhausting. Add to this a constant wrestling with the fact that Wittgenstein was very religious, yet thought all religious theory meaningless babble, and you have a recipe for depression.

Monk of course also pays attention to the content of his philosophical views, and makes sure that these are, in broad outlines, accessible and useful to a general public. For specialists and professional philosophers this will rather be a tantalizing overview than a sufficient working out of Wittgenstein's philosophical views, but fortunately Monk has also written several works of secondary literature on the subject, so that people can read those if they enjoy this biography (which I would certainly read first): How to Read Wittgenstein. What Monk does best is to integrate these philosophical viewpoints into the larger narrative of his life, precisely as a good biography of a philosopher requires. The only thing I found somewhat unsatisfying was why Wittgenstein changed his views so strongly after the Tractatus, more or less rejecting the entire foundation this work was based on. One would have expected something personal to reflect as radically the change in philosophy, but either it isn't there, or Monk doesn't bring it out.

The style of writing Monk uses is very pleasant, and he avoids being opinionated either way (though he seems to sympathize with Wittgenstein's spiritual problematic a lot more than I would). An appendix to the book also deals with the (in)famous Bartley's commentaries on Wittgenstein (Wittgenstein (Open Court Paperbacks)), in particular those parts dealing with his sex life. Ray Monk very sensibly here chooses the middle road - it is quite beyond any doubt that Wittgenstein had homosexual relations, but the idea of him prowling the Prater in search for rentboys belongs firmly in the domain of fantasy.
I devoured the 600-page biography of this neurotic genius in one weekend, owing to the fascinating nature of the subject as well as Monk's effective and lively portrayal of him. Very much recommended to a wide public.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
on 19 February 2013
I have just read this again and am astonished by it. Several times I have entertained the idea of following Wittgenstein's path from Ottertal to Sogne Fiord to Ireland as well as Cambridge and Vienna, even learning German for the purpose. I see that it would be waste of time. Monk has done a wonderful job. It is hard to see it ever being done better.
The enduring problem for me has always been whether or not Ludwig was a practising homosexual. Some scenes suggested it. The idea stems from the little book by Wm Bartley 111 which I read many years ago. I am now persuaded by Monk that he was not, that it was platonic love alone. The main reason is not that Kirk, one of the four lovers, was interviewed by Monk and strongly denied it. It is Wittgenstein's intense sense of his own sin and his anxiety to confess his sins to friends and family, gathering them together for the purpose [and how trivial they were!]. And his honesty, that too. His passion for the truth would never have allowed concealment.
It is worth noticing that had Ludwig not given away all his millions to his siblings many of his subsequent difficulties would never have arisen. Also, In the United States in his final year or so, he made the mistake of eating nothing but bread and cheese, not the five fruits and veg a day which are now thought to keep cancer at bay.
It hardly matters in the moral climate of today whether he was a homosexual or not. It is merely the smallest possible aberration in a life that had so much of the finest people in the priesthood about it.
If I have a criticism it is that the violence and disturbing aspect of Ludwig's personality does not emerge. In public, he did explode and destroy people for saying quite innocent sounding things.
I am surprised to see just how religious he was, how often the word 'God' is in his utterances. He was a Christian but without the unbelievable bits. He thought that religion could suffer at the hands of science, for which he had some disregard. Religion has its own language. Showing was always more important to him than saying and some things you could not talk about with perfect accuracy at all.

William Scott
22 commentsWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
on 16 September 2012
An intelligent and sympathetic portrait of a fascinating personality. This book is both detailed and comprehensive, with Monk allowing many of the principal characters to speak for themselves through excerpts from diaries, letters, memoirs and recollections. Nevertheless, persistent themes and motifs are allowed to emerge, so that one gets a sense of the concerns which dominated Wittgenstein's life: his thoughts on love and religion, his passion for music, his relationship with his family, and (above, perhaps, all else) his often tempestuous relationship with philosophy. Where there is speculation that goes beyond the available evidence, Monk is scrupulous in making clear its speculative nature, leaving the reader to draw their own conclusions (whilst outlining his own reasons for drawing his). Overall, this is a well-written, authoritative, and riveting read, that I would heartily recommend to anyone (especially, but not exclusively, to someone with an interest in Wittgenstein's work).
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
on 22 February 2013
I bought this biography because I was asked to give a presentation on Wittgenstein for a U3A Philosophy group - there are no knowledgable philosophers in this group just amateur 'dabblers' in philosophy. I love the book and it has stimulated me to read more in many different directions. The depth of research and extracts from letters and other documents brings Wittgenstein to life. I have now bought Ray Monk's How to Read Wittgenstein and hope to increase my understanding of his approach to philosophy. Also hope to read Ray Monk's biography of Russell soon.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
     
 
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
How to Read Wittgenstein
How to Read Wittgenstein by Ray Monk (Paperback - 7 Feb. 2005)
£7.99

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Ludwig Wittgenstein (Paperback - 31 May 2007)
£5.11

Philosophical Investigations
Philosophical Investigations by Ludwig Wittgenstein (Paperback - 6 Nov. 2009)
£20.89
 
     

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.