Shop now Shop now Shop now Up to 70% off Fashion Shop All Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Learn More Amazon Pantry Food & Drink Beauty Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen in Prime Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

3.1 out of 5 stars7
3.1 out of 5 stars
Format: PaperbackChange
Price:£8.99+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 15 July 2000
This is an extremely good book, beautifully written in a careful, gentle style which repays careful reading. It details the effects of the French Revolution at a very personal and local level, and presents a human story enriched with an evocative sense of time and place.
Occasionally I felt the author didn't make it clear which character was speaking, and sometimes I had to re-read to be sure I had understood what she meant. It is a book that demands concentration because she presents her story economically. Nevertheless, her writing is so very good that it was no hardship to read a passage twice through.
A passing knowledge of the course of the French Revolution would be useful before starting the book because the author immerses us in the period rather than treating readers as outsiders, so events are not always immediately explained.
I strongly recommend this book, and hope more by this author will be published.
0Comment7 of 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
TOP 500 REVIEWERon 25 February 2013
Michelle de Kretser's first novel, published in 2000, is set in Gascony between 1789-94. Sophie, the youngest daughter of the aristocratic but poor Sainte-Pierre family and not a beauty, has the unusual ambition of breeding a repeat-flowering crimson rose (no guesses what the author will relate this to).

At the start of the novel an American balloonist, Fletcher, crashes onto their estate out of the sky (might this be a sign of the Reign of Terror to come?) and, whilst convalescing, gets to know the family and is attracted to Sophie's sister, Claire, who is unhappily married to a bad lot, who gets his comeuppance, but is nevertheless beautiful.

Joseph Morel, a young and progressive doctor, lacking confidence and ever so humble, meets the family and harbours a secret passion for the rose-grower. The story that develops is part love story, part historical novel and part a channel for imparting a great deal of information about rose breeding, political and social developments in France around the time of the Revolution, the food and drink of the time, and new ideas about the role of hygiene in reducing diseases.

Whilst the novel is set in near the town of Castelnau, which could be any of the 30 or more mentioned in Wikipedia, the author cleverly brings in events in Paris and the wider countryside through newspaper reports, local discussions and debate, and by establishing conditions in the town that parallel those of the capital and lead to its own "mini-Terror". The novel is divided into sections describing actions and activities that occur each year. Despite the reality of the political and social acceleration of the revolutionary fervour into large-scale terror over this period, the author's style remains low-key thus preventing the necessary build-up of tension.

It is clear that a great deal of research has gone into this novel (as is evident from two pages of sources) but, not infrequently, it appears in rather stilted discussions between characters about the Revolutionary calendar, illness and medicine, and, of course, roses. Morel is driven by the aim of improving the health of the local population by reforming sanitation at which point it will no doubt be taken up across the country. Sophie, when she is not pruning and splicing, is aware of society's opinion of unmarried women and wants to change this. However, neither character really comes to life. I also had some difficulty in the first half of the novel working out which of the three sisters was talking or thinking since I found their voices insufficiently differentiated.

For readers who like dogs, Brutus appears regularly and keeps the Saint-Pierre family on their toes. There is a villain who tries very poorly to hide his wicked character but, since his exposure is a key feature of the latter part of the novel, this also fails to create tension. Even more frustrating, de Kretser breaks off in the last score of pages to include a letter which Morel sends to Sophie. It is almost as if the author is determined to keep the ending unemotional and low-key. Given that this is her first novel, perhaps her editor might have been more assertive?

It is interesting to have the period, which is most often described from a Parisienne perspective, presented from a distance that is both geographic and societal.

The final few pages look back from the comparative quiet of 1799, tie up the loose emotional ends and inform the reader whether the crimson rose is a reality or not. I am not sure that I cared very much either way. I certainly disagree with the Guardian critic who writes "... her final pages are a triumph".

It would be crass to suggest that this is novel for women rather than men since I think that either readership would benefit from being carried along by a much tighter narrative. I would certainly be ready to try another novel by this author, providing it was not set in the past, and I see that she has now published three more: The Hamilton Case, 2003; The Lost Dog, 2007 and Questions of Travel, 2012.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 9 September 2011
I agree with one of the other reviewer in that it wasn't always clear who was speaking. The chopping and changing of narrator irritated me a bit and interfered with my enjoyment.
(I'm not the sort of person who needs everything spelled out a-la-hollywood style, so it was a genuine frustration!)

I enjoyed the premise of the book and the characters, and didn't realise that post revolution pitted friend against friend to such an extent, so that opened my eyes.
It wouldn't stop me reading other works from the author, but won't be re-reading this one I'm afraid.
0Comment1 of 1 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 26 November 2008
I loved 'The Hamilton Case', also by Michelle de Kerstner. It was a suprise book, as I got it 2nd hand and didn't know what to expect, but it was beautifully written and very good. So I was really looking forward to reading this book but found it very weak in comparison. But this is an earlier book and her writing has obviously developed a lot in the interim. I would also be tempted to say that the author really found her voice when writing about the country she is originally from and its fascinating history and beauty, rather than a somewhat insipid tale of rose growers during the french revolution. This book was enjoyable to read and had flashes of what I loved in her later book, but is no comparison to 'The Hamilton Case'.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 5 March 2013
This book was a bit of a disappointment. I bought it having read "The Lost Dog", which I thought was brilliant; "The Rose Grower" was ok, but not as good as I'd hoped.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 20 November 2001
A lovely, lovely book that slips down almost effortlessly but with an ending that took my breath away. One of the best things I've read in a long time.
0Comment3 of 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 11 December 2007
For some reason I couldn't get into the story at all. French politics and roses...not quite my cup of tea, I'm afraid!
0Comment1 of 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Customers also viewed these items


Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.