Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen in Prime Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars7
4.1 out of 5 stars
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 15 March 2011
Professor Jardine does it again. She had a tougher task than with her equally scholarly and perhaps more enjoyable biography of Wren, On a Grander Scale: The Outstanding Career of Sir Christopher Wren, in that her protagonist is both less well known and less - well, likeable - than Wren. However, she succeeds in drawing a convincing picture of Hooke as an overworked, irascible, but thoroughly competent man, who to a large extent was the powerhouse behind so many of the scientific, technical and architectural achievements of the Restoration era.

Hooke provides a cautionary tale for workaholics and multitaskers everywhere; his masters at the Royal Society were staggeringly intolerant of his work for the Corporation of London. Yet if one looks at what was going on in the 1660s and 70s - whether the rebuilding of London after the Great Fire, or the unparalleled spirit of scientific enquiry within the Royal Society - and if one removes Hooke from the equation, it is difficult to see how any of it would have been achieved.
0Comment|3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 4 January 2004
Robert Hooke was very much a Renaissance man: artist, scientist, instrument-maker, and architect, he is remembered today only for Hooke's law which still forms the foundation of structural mechanics. However, he was at the time the major driving force behind the Royal Society. As its curator of experiments it was Hooke that both put forward the ideas to be tested and devised and built the equipment. He pioneered work in microscopy, made contributions in anatomy, changed the way we make clocks and watches and first put forward the idea that gravity obeyed the inverse square law. All this he did in his spare time between surveying London after the Great Fire and acting as an architect both in his own right and as Christopher Wren's chief assistant and friend.
This book vividly paints a picture of the life of this fascinating character. So lucidly is it written that one barely notices that it is brimming with fresh insights. An outstanding piece of scholarship and a brilliant piece of prose, this book is a must-have for anyone with an interest in the story of one of history's most colourful characters.
0Comment|27 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 21 February 2015
Robert Hook is a fascinating subject to study, but unfortunately Lisa Jardine wrote his biography in a rather laborious style. Hooke's life is recollected here in excruciating details, often through original texts of various lengths written in Early Modern English. It certainly has its own charm, but after a while I found this more annoying than useful. I would have preferred to hear the author's own voice rather than someone else's. Instead Jardine elected to let contemporary texts speak for her. For me this is academic literature at its worst.

Hook is an important figure in the history of science, but he has always been neglected and is almost forgotten today. This has a lot to do with the fact that he lived all his life in the shadow of giants like Isaac Newton. But more than three hundred years later it has become increasingly obvious for historians that Hook has made a significant contribution to the early development of modern science. That being said, potential readers need to know that this book is not meant to be a scientific biography. Yet I believe more attention should at least have been given to the conflict between Hook and Newton. Anyhow, if you are more interested in Hook's scientific accomplishments you will be better rewarded if you read other efforts that are dedicated to this important aspect of his life; like for example "The Man Who Knew Too Much" by Stephen Inwood, which appeared around the same time. In Jardine's narrative all areas of Hook's life are covered more or less equally, with no emphasis on any particular subject. This includes a long chapter on the role played by Hook in the large scale reconstruction of the city after the Great Fire of London. Overall it remains a reasonably well balanced book. And for sure one that the late Jacob Bronowski would have loved to preface. He would certainly be proud of his daughter's accomplishment.

Jardine reveals to us in the introduction that her book "aspires to tell a different story from the customary version of the life and brilliant career of Robert Hook which records him as the vain, bad-tempered, quarrelsome adversary of Sir Isaac Newton." The end result of this favourable prejudice is that we are presented here with a very obedient and devoted Hook. Therefore his legendary bad dispositions are not, in my opinion, given proper attention. It's like if Jardine had somehow overcompensated for the tendency of previous biographers to portray him as an inamicable fellow. Jardine may have wanted to express her own narrative voice, but in the end it is a voice that sounds a bit false. That is not because she lacks intellectual honesty, but rather is the consequence of her conscious decision to offer her own perception of what she thought was a more objective portraying of Hook.

There is another area where Jardine may again have lost her objectivity. This becomes evident in her obstinate quest to find a picture of Hook so that we could have a better idea of what he looked like. She writes "so deep was Newton's hatred of Hook, we are told, that he destroyed the portrait of him (possibly two portraits) known to have hung at the Royal Society." She had been on the lookout for a portrait that would have survived the purported desecration when she found one that appeared to her as an authentic painting representing Robert Hook. This is the portrait we find on the cover of her book in various editions. She adds defiantly "I propose to claim this portrait as Robert Hooke's, until it is proved to me that this is in fact recognizably a portrait of somebody else." Well, that is exactly what happened only a few years after she made this daring claim. According to Wikipedia the painting does not represent Robert Hook, nor John Ray (like it was originally believed), but is in reality a portrait of Jan Baptista van Helmont, as it has recently been demonstrated. Here is an excerpt from Wikipedia:

"In 2003, the historian Lisa Jardine claimed a recently discovered portrait represented Robert Hooke. However, Jardine's hypothesis was disproved by William Jensen of the University of Cincinnati and by the German researcher Andreas Pechtl of Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz. The portrait in fact depicts Jan Baptista van Helmont."

Therefore it now appears that Jardine had not conducted sufficient research to properly substantiate such a bold assertion. And it could even be said that in the process she made a fool of herself. Nevertheless, that does not subtract anything from the book itself which remains a valuable contribution to the history of science. But also, I am afraid, an enduring testimony of her impudence.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 27 February 2004
This biography falls short of Lisa Jardine's usual high standard. It needs a good edit and reorganization to provide form, remove repetition and add depth to a very haphazard account. Hooke's fascinating and varied life fails to come alive in these pages. For a man who never quite made the scientific impact he deserved, this biography shows a fitting symmetry and should also be overshadowed.
0Comment|17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 February 2016
An excellent biography. I'm glad Robert Hooke, who has been ignored for so long, has been given his rightful place in science. His work with Sir Christopher Wren is remarkable.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 12 January 2016
Well-received.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 March 2016
THX
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)