Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars23
4.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Format: Paperback|Change
Price:£14.99+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 25 August 2004
I had this book on my "to read" list for about a year, and then it sat on my shelf for five months after buying it before I finally got around to reading it. Now that I have finished the book I have to wonder what took me so long. The book is exceptional. From Beirut to Jerusalem is the story of Thomas Friedman and his analysis of the Palestine/Israel conflict. Friedman is a three time Pulitzer Prize winning reporter and this book presents and even handed and fair look at both the Palestinians and the Israelis. The book is broken up into three sections: Beirut, Jerusalem, and Washington.
Beirut is the story of the Palestinians. When Friedman was a young reporter, he was assigned a beat in Beirut (the newspaper made a point to assign a Jewish reporter to cover Beirut). Friedman does a good job showing exactly how the PLO came to power and the importance (and the flaw) of Yasir Arafat in the Palestinian movement. Despite being Jewish himself, Friedman does not present much of a bias against the Palestinians in his reporting. Friedman shows how there truly is no central authority for the Palestinians and how amazing it is the Arafat was able to unify the PLO into any sort of centralized body. The one thing that surprised me was how the Palestinians (and Beirut as a whole) was essential tribal politics. Beirut was an example of what can go right in having a disparate group of Christians, Jews, and Muslims live together in a Middle Eastern city. Beirut also ended up being a disaster of what can go wrong: everything. When push came to shove, the different groups split apart, formed militias and held fast to tribal lines. It was in Beirut that the PLO found a temporary home (at least until Israel pushed north).
Jerusalem is the story of the Jews. We all know the story of how after World War II the Jews were given a state in the Middle East and it was on their traditional homeland of Israel. This displaced the Arabs (Palestinians) that were living on the land at the time. Friedman discusses the Utopian vision that Israel is because of the religious context for the Jews. The interesting thing is that Israel was very nearly formed as a secular state for the diaspora Jews, and it was only the Orthodox and Ultra-Orthodox Jews that initially held onto their religion (rather than their culture). American Jews viewed Israel truly as the Promised Land, and the Christian world saw Israel through the tinted glasses of the Old Testament. Surrounded on all sides by Arabs who do not want the Jews in Israel, the nation has never truly been at peace and it is in this section of the book that Friedman shows just how difficult peace in the region is.
Washington is the end of the book and Friedman ties several things together. There was a very clear progression from Beirut to Jerusalem as Friedman was transferred over to Jerusalem, but at the same time I felt that Friedman presented enough material that I could begin to understand the context of Jerusalem. Thomas Friedman presents his thoughts on how diplomacy could possibly work for the Israelis and the Palestinians (using the Egypt/Israel peace as a model), and also further explains just how complex the relationships are in the Middle East. We get to see the attempts of the United States to broker peace deals, and how these succeeded and failed, and in some cases, why. Friedman discusses the role the United States does play, and perhaps should play in the region (at least as it affects Israel and Palestine).
This is an absolutely fascinating book. Obviously, this should be used as a primer on the subject and if one feels interested, should lead into further research into the region, but this was a very informative and interesting book and while I was confused at times by the complexity of the situation and shocked at the enormity of the problem, I also felt that I read a valuable book on the region. I thought this was an excellent book and it should belong on any "must read" list for books on the Middle East.
-Joe Sherry
0Comment|11 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 18 November 2009
Brilliant book for those of you that what a personal account of the Middle East struggles. The book provides some facinating insight into the cultures and political characters of this sometimes tense environment. The book is a must for anyone wanting to improve their understanding of the Middle East.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 18 September 2014
I knew little about middle east but this book gives really good insight into the recent troubles and complexities Seemingly without bias. Touring israel this coming month This book has provides another dimension.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 23 February 2014
Lots of detail but it's now out of date. Wish there could be an update to what is a very balanced and thorough analysis of the Middle East.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 3 August 2001
Although fairly well-balanced for an American version of the Middle East (i.e., 80% biased in favour of Israel), the book provides little useful analysis of the Lebanese, Lebanon or the powers (internal, local and international) that have used it as a venue for their own selfish battles. Better read Robert Fisk's "Pity the Nation", although it errs on the side of hysteria occasionally.
0Comment|29 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 19 December 2006
Coming from the Middle-East, I tend to be a bit sarcastic about Americans writing about Israelis and Arabs... Let's face it, they tend to not know what they are talking about.

Thomas Friedman is a different kind of Americans. He is a combination that doesn't happen so often. American Jew, fluent in Arabic, studied the Middle-East, and most importantly, lived in it long enough to know what he is writing about. I have lived between Syria and Lebanon almost all my life, and what I appreciate most about this book are the details Friedman can see in the lives of ordinary people there, and the understanding he demonstrates in the way they think. That is beside the historical accuracy and simplicity in which he puts his account.

It is one of the books everyone with interest in the Middle-East should read, alongside Robert Fisk's books...

Read it, and you will learn something
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 24 November 2003
The book has some interesting points. He basically points out some of the reality of what has been happening in the Middle East for decades . However, I really don't think that anything written in this book will really change the situation here. I feel sorry and ashamed for the amount of unbelievable injustice that my government (Israel) has shown in this region of the world (even worldwide to be honest!). Pretty vivid book.
0Comment|8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 2 January 2015
Excellent first hand account of the Middle East during the 80s. Invaluable reading.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 22 July 2014
A must read
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 13 April 1999
This is a brilliant synopsis of events in Lebanon and Israel - gripping, readable and concise. Highly recommended
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)