the lusitania is a much more important ship than titanic


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-11 of 11 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 16 Sep 2012 07:04:21 BDT
Man of truth says:
the lus brought the us into ww1.. the titanic sinking brought no country into anything.

Posted on 16 Sep 2012 20:47:22 BDT
HAPPY says:
Then don't watch it !

Posted on 21 Sep 2012 00:00:58 BDT
Man of truth says:
The Lus had more than 10 times Titan's importance.

Posted on 22 Sep 2012 17:21:13 BDT
Man of truth says:
the lus belongs in real history books not titanic.

Posted on 25 Sep 2012 02:24:14 BDT
Man of truth says:
sinking of the lusitania. that iz the 1918 film at youtube.

Posted on 26 Sep 2012 18:13:55 BDT
Man of truth says:
sinking of the lusitania is an enjoyable film.

Posted on 29 Sep 2012 18:04:56 BDT
Man of truth says:
cinema for the Lusitania.

Posted on 5 Oct 2012 18:07:58 BDT
DBS says:
You obviously fail to understand what the sinking of the Titanic meant for History.
You like the Lusitania better. Great. Good for you.
If you can write a script about the sinking of the Lusitania and convince a Hollywood studio to film it, great. I'll definitely watch it. If you manage to get the interest of the audience in the process, excellent.
But until then, you have to accept that people have less interest in ships sunk during a War, than in "unsinkable ships" that sink in her maiden voyage with tons of rich people in them.

Posted on 20 Oct 2013 21:47:05 BDT
Man of truth says:
Read about the Lusitania.

Posted on 20 Oct 2013 22:00:25 BDT
Man of truth says:
The Lus so one of a kind.

Posted on 22 May 2014 20:16:37 BDT
The Lus beats the Titanic in importance.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Participants:  4
Total posts:  11
Initial post:  16 Sep 2012
Latest post:  22 May 2014

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions