Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop Cyber Monday Deals Week in Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now DIYED Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen in Prime Shop now Shop now

2010: The Year We Make Contact 1984 Subtitles

Amazon Video

(142) IMDb 6.8/10
Watch Trailer

A belated sequel to Stanley Kubrick's '2001 - A Space Odyssey' (1968) - an earlier Arthur C. Clarke novel. Nine years after the Jupiter voyage of Discovery went mysteriously awry, the Soviet Union and United States team together to launch a salvage operation, despite being on the brink of nuclear war. The questions to which the crew seek an answer include ascertaining what happened to the ship'...

Roy Scheider, John Lithgow
1 hour, 55 minutes

Available to watch on supported devices.

By placing your order, you agree to our Terms of Use. Sold by Amazon Video.

Product Details

Genres Thriller, Science Fiction
Director Peter Hyams
Starring Roy Scheider, John Lithgow
Supporting actors Helen Mirren, Bob Balaban, Keir Dullea, Douglas Rain, Madolyn Smith Osborne, Dana Elcar, Taliesin Jaffe, James McEachin, Mary Jo Deschanel, Elya Baskin, Saveliy Kramarov, Oleg Rudnik, Natasha Shneider, Vladimir Skomarovsky, Victor Steinbach, Jan Tríska, Larry Carroll, Herta Ware
Studio Warner Bros.
BBFC rating Parental Guidance
Captions and subtitles English Details
Rental rights 48 hour viewing period. Details
Purchase rights Stream instantly and download to 2 locations Details
Format Amazon Video (streaming online video and digital download)

Customer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

74 of 77 people found the following review helpful By Stuart Bruce TOP 1000 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on 22 Aug. 2009
Format: DVD
2010 is a very, very different film from 2001: A Space Odyssey. In 2001, the first twenty minutes are completely devoid of dialogue; in 2010, the first twenty minutes are packed full of dialogue that attempt to explain, from the perspective of the people back on Earth, what happened to the Discovery mission nine years earlier. The stage is set for another trek to Jupiter- this time frought with danger (aerobraking around Jupiter, encountering strange readings from Jupiter's moons) instead of 2001's sedate ballet.

So 2010 gets maligned, I think, for being so utterly different from 2001, and for not having the kudos of Stanley Kubrick attached.

However I think that's unfair. The special effects were no less stunning (but by 1984 cinema audiences were used to spaceships, more so than by the 1968 original). The mystery is unravelled neatly, with some good performances, especially John Lithgow and Bob Balaban. The drama's handled extremely well, with an occasional flash of humour.

It still has Arthur C Clarke's novel firmly at its root, so as a science fiction story, it's a brilliant one.

In some ways it's very dated- the not-so-cold war between Russia and the US couldn't now happen in the way it unfolds in this film- but putting some of that aside, it is a really good sci-fi film that manages to both suffer and benefit from being in 2001's shadow. Definitely worth a look, especially at Amazon's current bargain price.

This DVD has no extras, which is a shame.
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Speedigee on 7 May 2013
Format: Blu-ray Verified Purchase
I saw 2001 around 1970 and thought it was awesome. Then I saw it again recently and thought it was a bit slow, although the special effects were still awesome and the overall experience was still one of wonder, especially considering that it was made nearly fifty years ago. So I approached 2010 not quite sure what to expect. We have now become accustomed to fantastic graphics and special effects in almost every film we see. 2010 was made in 1984 using broadly the same techniques as 2001, ie CGI as we know it now was only in its infancy. So relying heavily on purely photographic effects and physical models 2010 was made in much the same manner as 2001. The main difference was that 2010 had a more definable story line. It was still a little weird and the ending was just as unsatisfying but it somehow held together better. To sum up, 2001 was an abstract ballet of special effects with beautiful music while 2010 dispensed with much of the music and concentrated on telling a story. I quite liked it although it did not have the 'wow' factor that I remember from my first viewing of 2001.
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
15 of 17 people found the following review helpful By @GeekZilla9000 TOP 500 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on 30 Mar. 2012
Format: Blu-ray Verified Purchase
2001 - A Space Odyssey is an incredibly influential film which offers an immersive film experience which borders on the spiritual, it's worthy of being called a masterpiece and is regarded as one of the greatest pieces of cinema ever created. The sequel never manages to climb out from the shadow of the '68 classic but it is still a great work of science-fiction which does justice to the Arthur C Clarke novel.

2010 begins with an on-screen text prologue 'mission report' which summarises the events of 2001 (not an easy task!). It provides the essential facts to refresh the memory banks of any who haven't seen it for a while or for those who for reasons beyond comprehension, haven't seen it. It's obvious that the Discovery Mission is still a contentious issue with both American and Russian missions planning to meet with the stricken ship to find out what happened. With the Russians further ahead and the Americans in possession of the knowledge to bring HAL-9000 back online, a joint venture is inevitable. Given the cold-war nature of world politics the teaming up is a highly symbolic one, but during the long mission relations down on Earth worsen and the world edges into war. The human tendency to obliterate each other is far from the minds of those orbiting Jupiter however...

The mixed American and Russian crew find it difficult to integrate initially, but moments of joviality between crew members ("what's Russian for 'stupid'? ..That's me") and the threat of obliteration help to gel them together. It picks up nicely from 2001 and there's a great feeling of nostalgia when see the Discovery for the first time, but that's nothing compared to the re-awakening of HAL.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
48 of 56 people found the following review helpful By Mr Ghostface VINE VOICE on 19 April 2009
Format: Blu-ray Verified Purchase
Now, I won't use this review to justify the many virtues of 2010. It's a fine film. Is it the masterpiece of the film art that 2001 is? No. Is it more coherent, better structured and more accessible for regular film fans? Yes. It's got really wonderful performances from everyone involved, from Scheider, Mirren, Lithgow and Balaban down through the supporting actors. It also has some excellent visual effects (including some of the earliest CGI) and stunning cinematography. Peter Hyams was never given the credit he was due for 2010, although I did read a nice interview from Arthur C Clarke himself, who thought it was a fine film.

Anyway, if you already like the film, you probably know what I mean.

Right, the Blu-ray. It's disappointing. Is it higher definition than the lousy DVD? Yes, by a mile. But it's grainy, and sometimes fuzzy. Now, I can't say for sure whether this is because the source material for the HD transfer hasn't been restored very well or simply that the original image was inconsistent in clarity. I know it's possible to reprocess a 35mm image and achieve a picture that's actually superior to current HD cameras, like Blade Runner's lovely Final Cut Blu-ray or Baraka, but it costs a fortune and very, very few films will be restored to that level. Given these budgetary limitations, and knowing the quality of cinematography on 2010 is so high, I'm inclined to think this is simply a matter of a poor HD transfer. That makes it all the more disappointing, really, because this beautiful film is just not getting the treatment it deserves because of commercial factors.

The sound mix fine and clear, although nothing spectacular.
Read more ›
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse