Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Not that bad basically., 29 Sep 2006
The main problem with this film was going to be trying to live up to the first which is a classic steamy thriller. This had too much to live up to in comparison but it still passes as an ok thriller. Not quite as steamy as the first, but there is some sexual tension between Stone and the detective. There are a few sex scenes but nothing different from most films of this type. Stone does still look very sultry. The story is ok and as it progresses more plot twists come up with different suspects with various good reasons, could be the killer. By the end of the film you could be left wondering who was the killer and who used who as a cover up story. Overall better than a lot of thrillers but far from a classic like the first one. 6/10
|
|
|
22 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Sexpot Sharon is back for more sexy thrills!!! Hurrah!, 5 Aug 2006
Okay, so it was never going to win any Oscars, but is that really the
point? The answer: NO.
BASIC INSTINCT 2 never set out to be CITIZEN KANE. There was never any pretence that this was, like the the original, anything more than a fun, sexy, entertaining thriller with an intriguing female character at its core. It just seems like for the past few years, film critics have been expecting nothing less than Oscar winning, "issue" movies like BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, CITY OF GOD or CRASH. Therefore, whenever a fun, brainless movie like B.I.2 comes out, aiming to do nothing more than entertain for a couple of hours, it get's automatically and unfairly trashed.
Another reason I think B.I.2 was so reviled by critics is that, although they won't admit it, a lot of people are just plain jealous that Sharon Stone, at 48, still has the body and the confidence to do nudity and sexual scenes. Hollywood just seems to have something against older female actresses. I think when an actress hits 45 they autimatically expect her to only do parts where she's sitting knitting in a corner with a brown shawl over her shoulders! I for one think it's great to see a mainstream movie where the sexy heroine (or anti-heroine)is in her late 40's, and not some teen star like Lindsay Lohan or Hilary Duff. I think it sends out a good message to women of a certain age that they can still be sexy and confident. As for the criticism of the film itself, many critics just seemed to be ready to pour poison all over this movie before they had even sat down in the cinema. They probably started thinking up their lame put-downs the minute BASIC INSTINCT 2 was announced. They called it ludicrous, over the top and scathed Sharon Stones performance as leaden. In my opinion,both the movie and Sharon's performance were sorely misinterpreted by critics. For one, the filmmakers KNOW that the movie they are making is somewhat ridiculous - that's the point. It's clear from the outset that both BASIC INSTINCT movies have a sly sense of their own silliness, and are unashamed of it. They never set out to do anything other than offer up a slice of slick, sexy fun that can be both thrilling and quite amusingly camp. It is only an easy target for criticism because of it's unashamedly sexual content and its older female star who is only too happy to sit there with her legs open on a chair and say stuff like "Do you want to come in my mouth?"
As for Sharon Stone's supposedly "lifeless" and "leaden" acting, well that too is intentional - DUH! Playing Catherine Tramell, one of movie history's most intriguing and original female characters, Stone is SUPPOSED to be acting this way. The character is a cool, calm and dangerous ice Queen - that's why she always seems to have an uncaring and frosty exterior. It's actually a very good performance on Sharon Stone's part, who if you ever happen to see being interviewed on TV is actually a very sweet, bubbly and funny woman, completely unlike Catherine.
All I can say to sum up is that I'm a big fan of both BASIC INSTINCT movies, and no matter what anyone(especially film critics) may say, BASIC INSTINCT 2 is a very fun and enjoyable movie. So don't be put off by the harsh criticism, rent or buy it on DVD and check it out for yourself. I promise it's a real guilty pleasure that will have you feeling strangely aroused, intrigued and keep you guessing until the very unpredictable ending! I definitely plan to get it on DVD and proudly make it part of my collection.
|
|
|
21 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Sex, violence and death..., 14 Jul 2006
Basic Instinct 2 is indeed a guilty pleasure. Absolutely trashed by the critics upon its cinematic release a few months ago, the film disappeared pretty quickly, but it's a lot more fun than you might expect, and Sharon Stone as the Machiavellian best-selling crime novelist Catherine Tramell really is a pleasure to watch - although it's pretty obvious the actress is trying to fight the hands of time.
Some viewers might consider that Stone is a getting a little too long in the tooth to play this character, but I thought that at forty-eight her age - and her lurid type of sagginess - actually contributed to the authenticity of her character. She spends most of the movie spouting lines loaded with sexual insinuation, casually sitting around her pent-house London apartment in heels, tight skirt and full makeup waiting for Dr. Michael Glass (a very hot David Morrissey) to arrive.
The story is convoluted and not that believable and it tries to skewer the original movie whilst also presenting a fresh take on Catherine's murderous escapades. However, it's all good, sordid and garish fun. As the movie begins, Catherine is driving a fast sports car through the deserted streets of London, upon her climax; she crashes it into the river resulting in the death of a major sports star.
Roy Washburn (David Thewlis), a Scotland Yard detective with a bad attitude is convinced that Tramell, who managed to swim to the surface, was responsible for the man's death. She's got the best defense attorney her massive wealth can buy, so Washburn calls in top shrink Michael Glass (Morrissey) to run a forensic psychoanalysis that could nail her.
Of course, Doctor and subject form an attachment, with Glass becoming as sexually obsessed with Tramell. He's warned by Dr. Milena Gardosh (Charlotte Rampling) to stay away, but he just can't help himself. As the murder count piles up, Glass becomes increasingly captivated by "risk addiction" and we never know for sure who is murdering whom.
Sharon Stone is good as Catherine, probably because she knows the part so well, and lets face it - no other actress would dare to play the character. But the real discovery is David Morrissey as Michael Glass. His performance is much better than the film really deserves. He pulls off a multifaceted blend of conceit and scarcely concealed wrath whilst still remaining sympathetic. Thewlis is good too, nabbing all the best lines and sporting a bizarre Welsh accent.
One notable aspect of this movie is the slick and polished production design. In fact, the movie reminded me a little of the brilliant mid-eighties Kim Basinger film 9 ½ Weeks, which has many of the same qualities. Director Michael Caton-Jones has imbued his film a kind of trendy and urban architectural symbolism. Everything is slick and faux designed and London as never looked so fashionable and glamorous.
Glass' office is in one of London's new phallic steel-and-glass buildings, and the City's trendiest clubs and most modernized districts provide the bulk of the film's locations. These images are among the film's sharpest elements. The sex scenes are also quite well done - and are surprisingly hot; there's no doubt that Morrissey has the body to bear it all - although perhaps the lovely Ms. Stone shouldn't be showing as much as she does.
While Basic Instinct 2 obviously lacks the impact of its prequel, as a sexy and stylish thriller, it's still worth watching - and most importantly - it's entertaining. Although there are many mind-messes, red herrings and elementary guilt transferals involving murderous and closeted obsessions, particularly in the third act, the performances, particularly Morrissey's, ultimately make the film worth sitting through. Mike Leonard July 06.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|