|
|
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Way down your list of PKD priorities, 4 Jun 2003
With 40+ novels to choose from, only the truly devoted Philip K Dick devotee should grub about in these backwaters. Dick fans are used to toe-curling titles -- this is marginally better than "Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said" and "The Man Whose Teeth Were All Exactly Alike", at least -- but if you were expecting an embarrassing title to hide a treasure, as "Martian Time-Slip" did, say, you'll be disappointed. This is one of those potboiler PKD novels which scoot along for a brief-as-possible 200 pages without actually getting anywhere or coming to a worthwhile conclusion, books you assume Dick wrote with very little planning or even without a rigidly defined plot to follow, which he hacked out in his shed in one amphetamine-driven draft and bundled off to his agent before reaching for another piece of blank paper to begin the next."The Zap Gun" was originally published in two parts in Worlds Of Tomorrow in 1965 as "Operation Plowshare", but parts of the book will become familiar if you've read Dick's short story collections. As with many of his novels, he simply cribbed a large proportion of it from one of his earlier magazine submissions. Again, this sometimes works -- "The Three Stigmata Of Palmer Eldridge", his best book, for example, is a tangent off the "Days Of Perky Pat" short story -- but here it doesn't, and the short story source seems to have been introduced late in the proceedings to compensate for a lack of inspiration. There's also a telling drift from a purposefully literary and lighthearted opening chapter toward the familiar terse, neurotic PKD voice, and the emotional thrust of the book appears to happen by accident. It seems that PKD set up the scene in question without knowing what was going to happen, and spent the rest of the book trying to explain itself. Whatever original concept he had in mind -- a concept, not a plot -- ceased to be interesting about half way through. Not satisfying as a novel, then, and not one of Dick's most memorable or in any regards important works. For what it's worth, the concept may have been a dead end from the start, a potential short story that drifted out of control. It's the near future (from PKD's 1965 perspective; the book takes place in 2004) and as the cold war has mounted pace, barbaric nuclear weapons (which also destroy property and infrastructure -- Dick's disgust at the absurdity of this is one of the book's more effective passages) have been replaced by ever more exotic devices -- time and space disrupters and the like -- which are channelled from beyond by psychics under the influence of hallucinogenic drugs. In reality, none of these weapons work. The authorities of both sides know this, but fear of them keeps the population under control. Unfortunately, then earth is attacked by hostile aliens, and the population begins calling for some of those fantastic weapons to be used in their defence. All of which Dick ignores: the alien attack is hardly mentioned, the horrific loss of life hardly noted. Instead a totally irrelevant and uninteresting power struggle and love triangle is the focus. Great ideas are suggested but not developed. PKD seems aware that the book veers into parody and comedy, but is unable either to correct the problem or to swerve the book into all-out humour. Instead -- and unusually for Dick -- the novel suffers from an unnecessary dramatis personae in the form of a Ripley billboard and an unwieldy mockery of a subtitle: "Being that Most Excellent Account of Travails and Contayning Many Pretie Hystories By Him Set Foorth in Comely Colours and Most Delightfully Discoursed Upon As Beautified and Well Furnished Divers Good and Commendable in the Gesiht of Men of That Most Lamentable Wepens Fasoun Designer Lars Powerdry and What Nearly Became of Him Due to Certain Most Dreadful Forces". Which is fine if you're Kurt Vonnegut and write the novel to support it, but seems entirely out of place here. A shame: if he was capable of it, I would have loved to have read a picaresque Philip K Dick comedy romp. This isn't it.
|