Profile for Steve Keen > Reviews

Personal Profile

Content by Steve Keen
Top Reviewer Ranking: 827
Helpful Votes: 1915

Learn more about Your Profile.

Reviews Written by
Steve Keen "therealus" (Herts, UK)
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)   

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11-20
KIN: Songs by Mary Karr & Rodney Crowell
KIN: Songs by Mary Karr & Rodney Crowell
Price: 11.23

5.0 out of 5 stars Ten songs; ten high points, 27 Aug 2014
Lovers of Rodney Crowell and Mary Karr’s songs will love this. The different artists performing the songs each gives them a different seasoning, meaning that their amenability to different styles is brought out. Whilst often the lyrical style and subject matter are typical of the writers – outlaws, misbehaving parents, beloved siblings, home, sorrow – the performers’ interpretations are likely not always as Crowell himself would present them: it’s difficult to see/hear him delivering Momma’s On A Roll anything remotely like Lee Ann Womack does.

There are ten tracks and ten high points on the record, but here are some random observations.

Both If The Law Don’t Want You, delivered in world-weary style by Norah Jones, and My Father’s Advice, with Crowell accompanied by a gruff Kris Kristofferson, are still making me laugh out loud. God I’m Missing You, on the other hand, is infused with a sadness so deep by Lucinda Williams that I have to listen to it with a drink in my hand, even more so than Crowell’s own version on Tarpaper Sky. Somewhere in between, Sister Oh Sister recalls happy memories of a lost sibling, sung by Roseanne Cash with backing vocals by Chely Wright. And in addition to providing a tangible regretfulness for missed opportunities on Long Time Girl Gone By, Emmylou Harris sweetens up the vocals on the closing track, Hungry For Home.

To cite one of the old man’s pieces of advice, go on and give it a whirl.

Long Waves of Capitalist Development: A Marxist Interpretation
Long Waves of Capitalist Development: A Marxist Interpretation
by Ernest Mandel
Edition: Paperback
Price: 11.69

5.0 out of 5 stars Food for thought, 27 Aug 2014
Ernest Mandel’s take on Long Waves is an excellent demonstration of Ha-Choon Jang’s recent reminder, in his Pelican Economics primer, that economics is never anything other than political. The difference with Mandel is that he makes absolutely no secret of his angle. There is no hidden agenda. Mandel writes from a Marxist perspective, on the assumption that capitalism has had its day and it is now on life support, waiting for somebody to put it out of its misery.

His principal thesis is that, far from technological change being the driver of capitalist Long Waves, it is the exogenous shocks immediately preceding the adoption of the technology that enables capitalists to reduce wages, lay off workers, and make those that remain work harder, thus supplying the profits that provide the financing for the new technologies and reducing workers’ ability to resist their introduction. Examples of exogenous shocks are recessions, wars and politically motivated anti-worker legislation such as that introduced by the Tories in the 1980s, all factors which weaken the bargaining power of the working class and their ability to defend themselves.

It’s an interesting, almost compelling argument, and one that deserves consideration. In present context, following six years of the Great Recession, the UK economy is nominally recovering, yet most people’s wages are flat, and in real terms shrinking, the workforce is becoming increasingly casualised, and the wages of workers under 30 are reckoned to be round 10% less than they were in 2006. Meanwhile the banks, whose footloose practices dug the hole in the first place, continue to play financial derivatives poker at the same time as they absorb enormous fines for their malpractice, pay virtually no interest on deposits and refuse loans to businesses.

It is this final point that is symptomatic of the risk-aversity that has developed and is currently, contrary to what may be expected from Mandel, stifling the animal spirits that are needed to stimulate renewed prosperity. Thus an alternative view, to be found in a recent paper from Mariana Mazzucato and Carlota Perez (Innovation as Growth Policy: the challenge for Europe), also takes as its starting point the growth of profitability as a result of firms’ exploiting the weakened state of organised labour, but pinpoints the need now for opportunities for investment. In order for those to emerge, they argue, government needs to create the opportunities, through sponsoring R&D and through its own procurement policies, which reduce the uncertainty surrounding investment in new technologies, whilst simultaneously reforming the tax system to reward innovation in new technologies rather than in financial speculation.

Mazzucato and Perez put their case, I have no doubt, far better than I am able to in a couple of sentences. Whilst Mandel offers no hope for capitalism, and perhaps he’s right, their combination of Schumpeterian and Keynesian thinking offers a more compelling alternative for the capitalist system than secular stagnation culminating either in global impoverishment or Marxist conflagration, or maybe both.

Ernest Mandel offers a valuable perspective on the capitalist system, one that is overtly laden with an anti-capitalist political message. Mazzucato and Perez provide a pro-capitalist foil for that message, though less overtly, which steers a middle line between Mandel’s Marxism and the market-oriented fanaticism currently steering the global economy.

The Cajuns: Americanization of a People
The Cajuns: Americanization of a People
by Shane K. Bernard
Edition: Paperback
Price: 11.68

5.0 out of 5 stars Preserving a culture, 18 Aug 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
Unlike many accounts of the injustices and indignities imposed on the people now referred to as Cajuns, Shane Bernard’s focus is not on the original sin, the expulsion of the French inhabitants of L’Acadie, modern-day Nova Scotia, in the mid-18th Century, by the British, but upon their experience in their new home, Louisiana, in the 20th.

Bernard begins with the Second World War, the event which began the process by which the Cajun culture of southern Louisiana was inexorably subsumed and subverted by Americanism. As Cajun men were sent out into the world to serve in the forces, and brought back with them the message that their language was inferior and would get them nowhere, so others arrived in the state, especially to work the booming oil industry, bringing with them a demand for English and a condescension towards the Cajun way of life.

Tales abound of the active campaigns to eradicate French from the region, including punishment of children from French-speaking homes who insisted on speaking French when they were at school. Musicians who began by playing the folk music which had developed in the region were obliged by economics to adjust their repertoires to suit the taste of those whose preference was for rock and roll or country.

Then along came the sixties and with them the struggles by minorities, both in the US and abroad, for recognition and rights. Campaigns, albeit many of them hopelessly misdirected and misguided, were launched for the preservation of the Cajun dialect; musicians such as Dewey Balfa, who had stuck to their roots, found they had a ready and eager audience for their music in other parts of the US. A militancy developed in some parts of the populace which drove changing attitudes and led to the election of politicians from a Cajun background.

Sometimes there were setbacks. The political and economic upheavals of the mid-seventies halted some educational programmes in their tracks, or at least slowed them down, but in some cases that was not so bad as it afforded an opportunity for reevaluation and realisation, for example, that teaching Parisian French to Cajun children was doing nothing for a dialect that had not been heard in France since the 17th Century.

Inevitably, Bernard discusses at length the issue of authenticity, and of the ways in which “Cajun” has become a catch-all for tourist traps, even to the extent of selling New Orleans as Cajun when in fact its French background is metropolitan, not rural. He also mildly lampoons the adoption of southern Louisiana itself of the Evangeline myth, perpetrated by Longfellow, which sometimes sees girls dressed as milkmaids parading for visitors.

This perspective is useful for those who may be going to Louisiana seeking a Cajun experience. You’re as likely to meet a professional Cajun as a real one, although there is no taking away from the sincerity of those many people working to preserve what they can of the memory, if not the actuality, and that includes Bernard himself who, in sharing with his readers the good, the bad and the all-too-often ugly story of the Cajuns is ensuring that, whilst they may not altogether like where they are now, their unique culture is not lost to history.

Strategic Reassurance and Resolve: U.S.-China Relations in the Twenty-First Century
Strategic Reassurance and Resolve: U.S.-China Relations in the Twenty-First Century
by James Steinberg
Edition: Hardcover
Price: 19.95

5.0 out of 5 stars The future can be drafted now, 11 Aug 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
As China develops and its power increases, so the potential for misunderstanding with the world’s only, but waning, superpower grows. Politicians on both sides, under these circumstances, need to be aware of the risks, the potential scenarios that could play out, and have strategies for ensuring that the worst case scenarios are confined to the fields of conjecture. The key tools for achieving that goal are reassurance, in which each side goes out of its way to demonstrate that its intentions are good, and resolve, in which equally they demonstrate that any cheating will be punished. That means keeping the lines of communication open, taking all opportunities to engage in dialogue and joint operations, flagging intentions in any instances where there is potential for misinterpretation of activities, and, as far as possible, operating transparently.

Recent events have shown how all this can go wrong: through China’s overenthusiasm in drawing lines of possession around sea-girt rocks and, rather less symbolically, Taiwan; and in Edward Snowden’s revelations of the US’s covert surveillance activities. In terms of demonstrating resolve, on the downside there is US hesitation to act against Assad, despite his crossing of predefined “red lines”, but on the upside is the escalating action taken against Russia as retribution for Putin’s posturing over Ukraine.

James Steinberg and Michael O’Hanlon do a good job of analysing this unfolding chapter of China-US relations, presenting their case with clarity and, whilst clearly viewing the world from a “western” perspective, acknowledging that the US, for all its nurturing of potential rivals in the interest of a liberal international order, nevertheless has to prove itself capable of resisting the temptation to take preemptive action before it’s too late and China is suddenly in a position to seriously challenge it, as happened in the authors’ opening example in which Sparta attacks an ever-more powerful Athens, just in case, thus unleashing the Peloponnesian War. But the key message is that the onus in such a scenario falls on both parties equally to demonstrate good faith.

In using game theory to characterise the strategic dynamic the authors probably quite rightly draw on the Prisoner’s Dilemma in modelling the way strategic thinkers have approached the problem to date. In doing so the temptations associated with the consequent sub-optimum equilibria are recognised and a means of circumventing the problem thrashed out, preferably in collaboration. In so doing, they could have pointed out, the dynamics can be changed to transform the model into an Assurance Game, as the US and USSR did with their strategic arms treaties.

This all takes time, as mutual trust is not something available tied up in ribbons at your local gift shop. Alexander Wendt, challenging the fixity of confrontational geopolitical relationships in the Realist model, envisages the potential for transforming, long term, a culture of enmity between states into a culture of friendship. In between is a culture of rivalry. Steinberg and O’Hanlon appear to be looking at how the incumbent and upcoming global superpowers can at least exist as rivals within this continuum through a long-term process of give-and-take, operating in a world in which greater parity between their respective arsenals is overall a good thing.

In game theory, one of the ways in which models disintegrate is when one side’s rationality is the other side’s vision of hell, as with kamikaze missions. Then the model quickly transmutes into a Chicken Game, or worse. Steinberg and O’Hanlon appear to be working on the assumption that neither the US administration nor the Chinese bureaucracy will behave like James Dean refusing to pull his car out of a head-on collision.

All signs recently have shown this to be the case. If so, then the future just became a little less scary, as it is to be hoped that both sides in the equation are using guidelines such as these in their deliberations over how to conduct their affairs with each other. In the West, if you’re so inclined, you even have the opportunity, if you’re not a member of the elites determining policy, to at last vote for the part of the elite not seemingly hell-bent on cultivating suspicion and hostility. It’s better than nothing.

Human Evolution: A Pelican Introduction
Human Evolution: A Pelican Introduction
by R. I. M. Dunbar
Edition: Paperback
Price: 5.59

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Hooray for another Pelican!, 24 July 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
As a bibliophilic teenager, at least once a week I would make the pilgrimage downtown to Clulow’s, a sadly long-defunct independent bookshop, where I would enjoy browsing the Orange-, Grey- and Black-edged Penguins and iconic blue-edged Pelicans. At home my incipient book collection began to emulate the colour-scheme, allowing only the rarest glimpse of a white-edged Picador or randomly hued Panther. From those books I began my exploration of world literature and learned my first proper lessons in Greek and Roman history and mythology, philosophy, psychology, politics, economics and linguistics.

Some of those books continue to adorn my bookshelves, remaining as a reminder of an autodidactic past. It was therefore something of a thrill to find that the Pelican imprint was being relaunched.

Elsewhere I review the first product of this initiative, Ha-Joon Chang’s introduction to economics, which is excellent but, having just completed an economics degree I had a more informed and specialist view of its content, not to mention its overtendency to reference popular culture. Thus reading that book was a different proposition from the second, Robin Dunbar’s introduction to Human Evolution, a subject in which my prior knowledge was relatively shallow, but which manages to avoid, for example, references to Star Trek when explaining symbionts.

So it was that I began my transformation from casual to dedicated observer of people in groups, as that is essentially what for me is the greatest takeaway from Dunbar’s book. In the Financial Times Gillian Tett, an anthropologist by training, cited Dunbar’s revelation that on average the approximate human bonded-group size is 150, speculating on the implications of that for the way we live and, for that matter, the people on Facebook who claim to have thousands of “friends”. (Lower intimacy groups of 500, acquaintances, and 1500, tribes, are also covered, however.)

But the revelations that most interested me were those regarding the role of social grooming in releasing endorphins in the primate body, thus providing the pleasure associated with socialising, and the role language plays in increasing human efficiency in social grooming by doing away with the need continually to comb each other’s hair in pairs by permitting multi-tasking, engaging in social grooming by talking with each other as we hunt, travel and create.

One of the studies Dunbar cites involved the size of groups in pubs. Here the average size of a social group, a set of people who are obviously together is, apparently seven. But when it comes to a conversation group, where one or more people talk whilst the others listen, the average size is four, and laughter groups, in which people talk and occasionally laugh together is three. The efficiency in this arrangement is that unlike social grooming of the hair-combing variety, the release of endorphins occurs in both giver and receiver, not just the receiver, hence three people are groomed simultaneously.

The numbers cited are what have had me paying more attention lately to groups of people in public places. Thus should you find yourself aware of some weirdo paying an unusual amount of attention to your small gathering in a public place, it may be me, seeing if you’re tuning out as the fourth member of your group relates an amusing tale.

(Incidentally, who knew that it was possible to get paid for sitting around in pubs watching people chat? Why wasn’t I told earlier? But more seriously, I did also wonder if pubs are the best places to run this kind of study, and what the results may have been in, say, a works canteen or sports centre.)

Dunbar begins his study by outlining the questions he is setting out to address and the two essential tools he will be using, the social brain hypothesis and the time budget models. He explains the differences between hominins and hominids, why the great apes are unable to live far from the equator, details the five transitions in human evolution that have brought us to where we now are, and explores potential explanations for how language, fire and cooking allowed our precursors to travel, organise and develop sophisticated modes of reasoning and expression, eventually becoming Anatomically Modern Humans. He also explores the potential reasons why Neanderthals, contrary to popular myth highly evolved and intelligent, nevertheless became extinct whilst homo sapiens survived and thrived.

What becomes apparent as Dunbar progresses is that, far from there being a missing link, there is a remarkable amount of contiguous evidence available for us from which to construct a history of human evolution, much of which extends beyond theory into what Richard Dawkins calls “theorem”. We will never know the precise date when the first word was spoken, nor what it was, or the location or source of the first artificial fire, but we do know enough to say when brains and physiologies, and behaviour and diet had developed sufficiently for these things to be potentially possible. Fire, for example, as well as extending the length of the day beyond nightfall, improved the efficiency of eating, rendering meat both more digestible and more nutritious, reducing the quantity of food required to survive and the amount of time required for acquiring and eating it, thereby freeing up more time for socialising and creating the things that ultimately make us human, including religion and art.

Later, as human groups expanded, came the development of culture, freeriding and the appearance of pair-bonding. On this latter Dunbar is almost clinically analytical, dissecting the several possible reasons why pair-bonding came about, and examining the ways in which the pair-bond breaks down along with potential reasons, including the presence of a philandering gene in some people. I’m not sure, though, that reference to this is going to help next time you’re caught by your partner indulging in extra-curricular activities.

The book therefore gives myriad insights into what we are, where we came from, and why we do some of the things we do, making the routine of everyday living a source of interest. Evidence of learning is sometimes said to be a change in behaviour. Clearly I’ve learned.

I only have one quibble. On a couple of occasions the word “design” creeps in in places where more care is needed, as with a footnote which describes human feet as “designed” to allow a striding form of motion. Strictly speaking they “evolved” that way; using the word “designed” runs the risk of further confusing those folks who believe the world is only 6000 years old. There are also a couple of occasions where Dunbar seems to be over-enjoying the flaws in some other people’s theories, rather than just, as he does when he’s most convincing, surgically assessing the weaknesses in their assumptions and conclusions.

Echo Sessions
Echo Sessions
Price: 6.76

5.0 out of 5 stars Not what I was prepared for, 14 July 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Echo Sessions (Audio CD)
Fresh with the sounds of their eponymous long player, I ordered The Stray Birds’ Echo Sessions EP. As I might have expected, the former only partly prepared me for the latter.

Where the long player tends to favour the individual voice, the EP feels much more oriented to harmonising featuring the voices of all three members of the group, the exceptions being San Antone Rose, in which Maya de Vitry leads, and Blue Yodel #7, led by Oliver Craven. There’s less fiddle and very prominent mandolin and no wild instrumentals.

All this and some intangibles I haven’t quite put my finger on yet, but possibly down to production details, give the EP a different feel from the long player.

Still, having at first been a little blindsided by the differences I’m now also noticing the general similarities, like the exceptional musicianship and vocal delivery, which serve to fulfil the Birds’ aim of offering a tribute to the writers of the songs. The two songs with which I was not previously familiar, When I Stop Dreaming and Blue Yodel, will likely be my reference points for any future versions I hear. Loretta and San Antone Rose, which I’ve heard a few times by other people, are rapidly going the same way. And although at first I wondered if their emotional attachment with I Wish It Would Rain was a little lacking compared with Nanci Griffith’s own version on Winter Marquee, having listened a couple more times I think I was wrong.

And unlike the long player, there are no swing pieces to fast forward. Five for five.

Economics: The User's Guide: A Pelican Introduction
Economics: The User's Guide: A Pelican Introduction
by Ha-Joon Chang
Edition: Paperback
Price: 5.59

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The lunatics are in control, 14 July 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
For me it was the crash of ’86. For others it will be the Great Recession. Whenever economic calamity strikes we reach for a textbook to gain an understanding of what just happened, why, and what can be done about it. Three decades down from the awakening of my own curiosity I find there are more questions than answers, and they’re multiplying all the time. One of the virtues of Ha-Joon Chang’s introduction to Economics is that, unlike many of the books and courses I’ve devoured over the years, it makes clear that there is no silver bullet. Some of the people claiming to have the answers are as clueless as the rest of us, and that applies in spades for the uncritical cheerleaders of the neo-liberal consensus who laid the foundations for the current debacle, a process some have traced to 1979 and the election of Thatcher and, in short order, the 1980 election of Reagan.

In fact, one of Chang’s bugbears is the laughable concept of the “trickle-down” effect, made “popular” in the Reagan era, where we put even more money in the hands of the rich in the vain hope that they’ll invest it in something that will eventually provide the rest of us with a job and prosperity. Ha! How’s that one working out for ya? Well, looks like most of the people with the money are still investing in the kinds of complex derivatives that got us here in the first place, not in the capital equipment and R&D that would actually be useful.

Much of the content of the book deals with fairly basic economic concepts, clearly positioning it as a primer, but for those wishing to know more the Further Reading sections at the end of each chapter are excellent, referencing some of the books I had in mind when reading. Throughout the text new concepts are printed in bold so they’re easy to find if that’s what you need to do. Chang’s aim is, as I interpret it, to democratise economics, and in that he succeeds reasonably well, arming non-economists with sufficient insight to build an informed opinion and begin to challenge the views of the professionals.

One of the more useful things for me was the chapter explaining the different schools of economics, and who fits into which. One of my surprises in this was his placing of Paul Krugman in the neoclassical school, when I expected to find him in the Keynesian. However, Chang makes a good point about the essential conservatism of some of Krugman’s thinking, especially when it comes to his views of low-wage factory jobs in the developing world.

I do however feel he emphasises the wrong aspect of Schumpeterian thought, the atrophy of capitalism, and doesn’t make enough of the concept of “creative destruction” (it’s not even in the index). But at least it’s in the text, which is more than can be said for inflation, NAIRU and the Philips Curve, a shame given his treatment of unemployment, the other side of these concepts, is so good. He also misses some very straightforward opportunities to introduce the ideas of agency theory, moral hazard and adverse selection (though he does manage principal-agent problem), and the paradox of thrift. Perhaps he was trying to avoid overloading with jargon, and it’s partly true that economists (and other specialists, for that matter) use jargon to obscure rather than clarify, but it’s at least equally true that the use of specialist language can both shorten a conversation and give it focus.

Chang’s use of language is generally straightforward, with clear explanations of the ideas with which he deals. Sometimes he makes reference to popular culture in order to make his point, and this works better in some cases, as in the reference to Gordon Gekko in Wall Street, than others, as when he tells us not only that the Hoover Dam appears in a Superman movie but also that the movie stars Christopher Reeve. And much as I like the idea of an explanation of positional goods channelled through Sheldon Cooper of The Big Bang Theory, it becomes overlong when accompanied by a psych evaluation of the character and a rundown of the programme’s dramatis personae. At times like this, attempts to brighten up your subject look too much like an uncle dance in an Ibiza nightclub.

Having said all which, he’s right an awful lot more than he’s wrong. Overreliance on a single set of theories and models renders you blinkered; adopting a pluralist approach may not guarantee a correct analysis but may at least make it less wrong. Recent economic thought has concentrated too much on the market at the expense of non-market aspects of the world. Some things – free trade, comparative advantage, foreign direct investment – look great on paper and in static models, but the moment they are injected with a whiff of reality their elegant simplicity looks like starry eyed, rose-tinted idealism or, worse, cynically disingenuous. Apparently “scientific” measures such as the Gini coefficient and GDP, without proper understanding of their underlying strengths and weaknesses, are limited in their ability to tell us anything useful (although maybe it’s a case of their being the worst measures available except for all the others?). And, ultimately, that economics is political, driven by the personal agendas of economists themselves and the people and institutions that finance their work.

So back to the beginning. Will it help with an understanding of what went wrong in 2008?

Chang very carefully explains what the different types of banks do and are allowed to do. How some of them thought it would be a good idea to take a chance loaning people with poor credit ratings and little or no income enough money to buy themselves a house and bundle up the resultant debts into securities and sell these to other institutions to diversify the risk. How this was supposed to diversify away systemic risk, based on the assessment of some very clever mathematical modelling. And how the securities were ultimately so complicated that the associated contracts ran to hundreds of pages that virtually nobody had the time to read. Admittedly what he doesn’t tell us is what Nate Silver and Felix Martin, amongst others, have told us about the models’ being based on a limited dataset derived mostly from years when economies were booming, but by now most of us have got the idea that the problem was that the lunatics had taken control of the asylum. Read it and weep.

The Stray Birds
The Stray Birds
Offered by Fulfillment Express
Price: 12.29

5.0 out of 5 stars Suckered! Fortunately, 26 Jun 2014
This review is from: The Stray Birds (Audio CD)
I admit I fell for it. I look at one thing and something else comes up as a suggestion, so I listen to the snippets online, decide it sounds worth a punt and buy it.

Fortunately this turned out to be a good choice in this case. The Stray Birds' eponymous record is worth every penny, a lovely taste of Americana delivered by the most accomplished musicians.

Before I checked out their biography I was already thinking of Gillian Welch as a point of comparison, and this appears to be everyone's thinking when listening to Maya de Vitry's singing. But when considering the fiddle playing, it's like having two Alison Krausses in the room, although I haven't heard anything by Krauss to match the five-minute Wildman instrumental medley in which de Vitry and Oliver Craven take turns to strip the horsehair from their bows. (There's a great video of them playing this online.)

On songs like Dream In Blue and Railroad Man de Vitry's voice is haunting, and on Wildflower Honey (a little bit of a nod to The Carter Family's Wildwood Flower?) heartbreaking; Craven too has a good voice and his 25 To Life is particularly good.

Like some other exponents of Americana (I think of Red Stick Ramblers and Pine Leaf Boys, for example) the band lives up to its name and strays away from its country/folk foundations and delivers a couple of swing numbers which, for me at least, don't work quite so well; if the whole album had been like No Part Of Nothin' I'd have politely declined the offer.

Fortunately this and Just Sayin' don't crowd out the good stuff, and I've already sent this record to a friend as a gift and gone for buying a bit more. Had Amanda Petrusich been writing It Still Moves, about her search for the next American music, now, The Stray Birds would almost certainly be in there.

Tarpaper Sky
Tarpaper Sky
Price: 9.74

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Solid performance, 24 Jun 2014
This review is from: Tarpaper Sky (Audio CD)
Following Rodney Crowell’s sublime collaboration with Emmylou Harris, any subsequent works could only possibly be on a par with that difficult “second album”. Buyers of the earlier work will have their expectations so high as to be set up for disappointment.

Fortunately, whilst not quite coming up to the mark of Old Yellow Moon, on which there was an unbelievable chemistry between the two singers, Crowell puts in a solid performance which should more than please his existing and new followers.

The standouts for me are the opener, The Long Journey Home, which I could hear Springsteen making into a stadium rocker, and The Flyboy & The Kid, which has a feel reminiscent of some of Crowell’s earlier work from The Houston Kid on, as does I Wouldn’t Be Me Without You. Frankie Please evokes memories of Eddie Cochrane and Jesus Talk To Mama has a gospel feel that would have suited Elvis. There’s also the blues-inflected Somebody’s Shadow to further show Crowell’s range of influences, but that still leaves plenty of room for Country.

For me, the only song that doesn’t quite work is Fever On The Bayou, which feels a little self-consciously derivative, churning out the clichés about Jolie Blond and Louisiana Queens, and seems to be tucked into second place so as not to deter further listening but to have been more-or-less forgotten by the end of the record.

If that was indeed the intention, it kind of works. Only an old curmudgeon like me would even bring it up.

The Hamlet Doctrine: Knowing Too Much, Doing Nothing
The Hamlet Doctrine: Knowing Too Much, Doing Nothing
by Jamieson Webster
Edition: Hardcover
Price: 10.49

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Challenging and provocative, 12 Jun 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
Hamlet is widely regarded as the bard’s most intellectually challenging work. In simple terms its tragedy centres on the perils of indecision and hesitation, but it offers many degrees of complexity, some on the surface, some deep down in the darkest realms of the soul.

It is in these murky depths that Critchley and Webster’s The Hamlet Doctrine dwells.

Some of the commentary inhabits fairly familiar and well-trodden ground, such as the Oedipal interpretations grounded in Freudian psychoanalysis, but often the strength of the book’s narrative is in its juxtaposition of several different commentators to set up corroborations, comparisons and conflicts.

Some is challenging and provocative, as the authors ruminate on Hamlet’s essential unlikeability, his apparent role as a spymaster and tyrant-in-the-making, the possibility that Horatio is Fortinbras’s spy, the numerous potential interpretations of Ophelia’s role in the drama, and Laertes’s part as twin, mirror image and (though they don’t use the word, to my recollection) doppelganger. Their speculation that Hamlet is a nihilist, based on the repetition of the word “nothing”, may be less controversial now than when I suggested the same of Shakespeare himself in a youthful essay on Lear and Macbeth, where the word is pivotal, but they go further and combine the thesis with a romp through poor Ophelia’s sexual organs and make the connection between these and the “O” in Ophelia and the word “nothing” itself, a point explored more deeply, if you’ll pardon the expression, in Wells’s book Shakespeare, Sex And Love.

Throughout are woven a multitude of references, classical to contemporary, with Plato, Euripedes, Sophocles, Beckett, Eliot, Joyce, Racine, and ( both in bucketloads) Nietzsche and Hegel all getting a look in. There are interesting factual nuggets such as the story that Hamlet’s world premiere was on a boat off the coast of Africa, and the almost inevitable identification of Sophocles with Eeyore and Hegel with Winnie-the-Pooh. What I think they miss is that both Hamlet and Pooh have a Hum, though they do ponder the import of the prince’s for some time.

Some of the writing is somewhat irritating, as in the early stages with the repeated use of the rather unliterary and totally banal “from the get-go”, but in general the style is pop-book academic with a colloquial seasoning to inject a little rock’n’roll. Although I’d have enjoyed it in my days as an official Shakespeare scholar I’m glad it wasn’t around at the time as it would have stolen my thunder.

Our ability to approach it on many different, sometimes quite esoteric, levels is a great strength of Shakespeare’s work. It is why for over four centuries people of all classes have flocked to see it performed: each time you see a Shakespearian play it reveals something new to you. Sometimes these revelations are enhanced by commentaries like The Hamlet Doctrine. After you’ve read this, let’s see what you notice next time you attend a performance of Hamlet.

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11-20