Profile for Chris Hoare > Reviews

Personal Profile

Content by Chris Hoare
Top Reviewer Ranking: 137
Helpful Votes: 3615

Learn more about Your Profile.

Reviews Written by
Chris Hoare "Chris" (UK)

Page: 1-10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21-30
Finish Power and Pure All-in-One (Pack of One, Total 50 Tablets)
Finish Power and Pure All-in-One (Pack of One, Total 50 Tablets)

4.0 out of 5 stars Compressed does the job, 2 May 2014
Customer review from the Amazon Vine Programme (What's this?)
Finish Quantum tablets barely fit in my dishwasher drawer. The Finish power and pure tablets are about 70% of the volume of their bigger brothers. With my normal dishwashing tasks I didn't notice any difference between the more expensive quantum and cheaper power and pure.

Bosch PDO 6 Detector
Bosch PDO 6 Detector
Price: £36.95

6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Power lines seem to cause issues, 13 April 2014
This review is from: Bosch PDO 6 Detector (DIY & Tools)
Customer review from the Amazon Vine Programme (What's this?)
Despite following the instructions the Bosch PDO6 kept crying wolf in my apartment. Its easy to use; put on the wall press the single power button to turn it on wait for the auto calibration to say its ready.

Using the PDO6 on a partition wall with wooden studs moving slowly the PDO6 was able to detect studs reasonably accurately - reasaonly in that in each direction with a centimetre of disagreement. Where i knew there was a partition from previous work it agreed with my knowledge. Moving Along walls with metal supports it was far better and detecting the hidden content getting it bang on in each direction (again now power.) Moving onto a wall power cables in it the PDO6 beeped consistently at any height warning me about power lines - in doing so it failed to tell me about studs as it was too busy crying wolf about power cables meters away from where i was measuring.

Given my issues with checking walls with power cables (And that 80% of my walls have power cables in them) I really can't recommend the PDO6.

Veho VCC-100-XL MUVI X-Lapse 360 Degree Photography and Timelapse Accessory for iPhone/Action Cameras/Time Lapse Cameras - Black
Veho VCC-100-XL MUVI X-Lapse 360 Degree Photography and Timelapse Accessory for iPhone/Action Cameras/Time Lapse Cameras - Black
Offered by total digital stores
Price: £16.55

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars 1 Hour timelapse, 13 April 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
The Veho X-Lapse is built to take rotating time lapses; in the box Veho supply the clockwork rotating time-lapse body along with an adaptor to connect a phone. If you remove the adaptor there is a standard tripod screw to let you connect a light camera (or go pro.) The clockwork section has a tripod thread on the base; as well as 3 extended feet for a few extra stability options.

It takes an hour to do 360 degree's; time well spent in the right place. Overall the Veho is cheap and a fun way to make some interesting videos and you get to take some time to enjoy your environment whilst it slowly spins around.

Garmin Fenix GPS Multisport Watch with Outdoor Navigation
Garmin Fenix GPS Multisport Watch with Outdoor Navigation

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Its not the watch its the software, 13 April 2014
Customer review from the Amazon Vine Programme (What's this?)
I have walked miles with the Garmin Fenix watch; taking it hiking around the Derbyshire countryside and Central London. As a digital watch the Fenix has some nice features; the time is always accurate using the GPS clocks; it also has multiple time zone functions.
If you are going to put a watch this size on your wrist you are going to want something more; and Fenix delivers with programmable tracks; route tracking there is also a barometric altimeters and a temperature sensor that can warn you about changes in temperature. The temperature and altimeter features need a degree of setup each time you want to use them in order to make them accurate. You can purchase separate external temperature, heart rate monitors and cadence sensors to give you some physiological monitoring as you go.

In central london the GPS was better than i expected at keeping track of where it was; on the paths there were gaps as I walked between large buildings but the majority of the tracks was intact. In the Peak District it was pretty much perfect; alerting to route changes and keeping track of where we had been.

Programming the routes the Garmin way requires you to use Garmin's Basecamp software. The problem being that Basecamp's maps are appalling you can't plan any route using them - the country is a blank slate with only major roads and cities showing. You can pay Garmin to get more detailed maps or download maps from alternative online sources. Once you have some more detailed maps you can program routes and transfer them to the fenix with the supplier USB dock.

After using base camp to plan some walks I connected up to Garmin's Connect service which uses bing maps to show where you have been out for your run. I am no runner but for tracking where you went and how fast you did it it seems excellent keeping track of pace; along with the detail from the altimeter it tracks as you go up and down hills too.

The watches battery life help up to Garmin's claims - running purely as a watch it was still going on day 5. Using GPS the battery drains much quicker - in central London it lasted about 8 hours and was almost flat. Recharging it is super convenient using USB (there is a mains charger in the box) - and you can use an external power device to keep it going longer unlike my older GPS which was AAA powered.

Overall for me its a 3* device. The basecamp software is a real letdown and out of the box is unusable; and feels like Garmin just want to make more money out of good customers who have already invested a considerable sum on the watch. For runners the picture is rosier; the Connect software is very good. For everyday use the watch itself is too bulky (and its digital.)

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS Compact Zoom - Black (16.1MP, 30x Optical Zoom)
Canon PowerShot SX700 HS Compact Zoom - Black (16.1MP, 30x Optical Zoom)
Offered by TODO! TODO!
Price: £184.99

143 of 151 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A new dawn, 5 April 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
I guess Canon evolved the SX200 series cameras as far as they could take them; the SX280 was a great travel / pocket camera; albeit one you needed a spare battery for. The SX700 loses features from the SX280 - most painfully for me a reduced ISO range and for travelling around and knowing where you took your photo its disappointing to lose the GPS feature. In exchange for those features you gain 4megapixels with the SX700 having 16 megapixels and an extra 10x of zoom taking it to 30x and to try and manage that extra zoom the image stabilisation has been improved. After the new zoom the next big improvement is the new screen on the back has twice the resolution so it looks more clear; and the menus look better. The battery live is also still improved; though the SX700 still doesn't charge via USB needing a cumbersome charger to go on holiday with you.

The zoom / Lens
In my first city centre based experiments with the camera I found the camera nice in the hand. The button layout is new but the movie button is better on the top than the back. There is a snap out of zoom button to help you frame your photos; press it the SX700 zooms back and shows a box where your zoom was; release it and it snaps back; excellent for tracking moving objects. That 30x zoom does come at a price though; I have steady hands but zoomed out to 30x its very difficult to hold the camera steady; and for truly sharp images you need a tripod; back at 20x its much easier to control the camera. The pictures modes are still there from the SX280; including my favourite miniature mode (which is also available in the video.)

Still Photos
The drop in ISO / raise in mega pixels has resulted in mostly noisier photos which is a step backwards. I also feel at the extreme ends of the zoom the image quality isn't as good as it should be; photos look out of focus. I have uploaded examples of the zoom range in the city centre a couple of photos from a walk in the Peak district. The Robin Image has really good image separation (and the background blur is excellent) but the Robin itself isn't really in focus - you can't see the feathers. As a snapshot it might be more than enough; but you can get a better photo.
The drop in ISO ability is most noticeable when you are out with friends; I took my SX700 to a retirement party in a restaurant; less than perfect lighting. Pretty much all photos the camera asking me to raise the flash (its manual now which is a big improvement) at times the SX280 wouldn't have done so. With the flash on the pictures were very good; but do you want to fire a flash in a restaurant?

The video image quality is better; as is the sound quality. I took and the video stabilisation is markedly better - even at the extreme 30x end of the zoom. The sound quality is excellent; shooting video of songbirds in the forrest the audio was very good; in the city the auto levelling the microphones are internal to the camera but are now on the camera race. As they are internal though so the zoom is evident if you use it. The video looks better than its processor - and it doesn't destroy the battery in the way it did with the SX280. There is a super 240fps mode at very low resolution if you want to analyse sports or other fast moving events the SX700 can still make super slow motion videos.

Its Peers
I get to play with a lot of cameras the SX700 (as with the SX280) I bought with my own money. If you are looking to spend your own money; my honest advice is at the time of writing the SX280 is considerably better value. If you want the latest toy; the Canon has good image and video quality compared to its peers. The interface is also much more responsive and easier to use than its sony and olympus peers. . Compared to the competition I have a Sony super zoom and had an Olympus in my camera cupboard both are in the 20-30x zoom space and competitors. Both have higher megapixel counts in their sensor but take more noisy photos (and in the case of the olympus it feels sluggish.) In my use the SX700 is excellent compared to its peers. Using MP4 video on the canon the video is easier to work with than the AVCHD of the Sony; and the image and sound quality on the SX700 is noticeably better than both the Olympus and sony. The sound levelling in the SX700 seems much improved.

Sharing photos / there is an app for that
The Canon iPhone / android app lets you take pictures or share them on the internet is easy to get from the app stores; and its easy to use with the SX700. The Canon app lets you take and share photos; and in use its more flexible than Sony's was (though sony cameras all have differing interfaces so that may change) - both the Canon and Sony apps worked first time - I have never been able to get the Olympus one to connect.
My advice on the Canon SX280 when it came out; was it was better than its predecessor but the significantly lower price tipped the purchase in favour of its predeccessor. I think at the time of writing the SX280 is far better value; as the price of the SX700 comes down that will change. Im just not sure the SX700 is all that much better than its predecessor. The extra zoom range is nice; but when using those high zooms you don't get a sharp image unless you have some kind of support. I also miss the in camera GPS function; I can use my phone with the app to tag images - but that comes at the expense of both camera and phone batteries which isn't a good solution.
Compared to its competition its 4 stars at the current price point; its pictures are generally better but it doesn't feel like a polished product. Bring on the SX720 in 2015. At its current price its predecessor is 5*.
Comment Comments (11) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Sep 15, 2014 1:56 PM BST

Giottos Vitruvian VGRN8255 Carbon Fibre Tripod with MH5400-652 Ball Head - 6kg Weight Capacity
Giottos Vitruvian VGRN8255 Carbon Fibre Tripod with MH5400-652 Ball Head - 6kg Weight Capacity

4.0 out of 5 stars Almost perfect, 30 Mar. 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
I bought the Giottos Virtuvian in an out race with the manfrotto 055 series tripod. I knew I wanted the lightness that came with Carbon fibre but I also wanted a compact tripod I could get into a check in suitcase. The Vitruvians collapsed height of 40cm; and that Giottos unlike Manfrotto still give you a bag inched it my way. The included Ball Head was a nice bonus (in my mind) but something I would swap out for a manlier head early on.

Out of the box the difference in weight to my previous travel aluminium tripod (a Giottos MT GTMT9340B - a considerable cheaper tripod now) was noticeable. Eager to get it setup I quickly untwisted the grips and extended the legs in my living room; one of them sagged down -and that is a common theme each time i use it. I never tighted each twist lock as much as I should have done. One tightened the second noticeable difference to my previous travel tripod is just how rigid it is.

The legs of my older giottos sagged as they took up the weight of my Canon 6d seemingly irregardless of the lens I attached. The VGRM8255 legs held up to my 6D even with a Sigma 150-500mm attached; surprisingly to me - so did the included ball head which proved to be as much of a star as the carbon fibre legs. It has a nice friction control for all angles; and a separate control for panning. Its not going to be something you shoot video with but for stills its a very nice mount to start with. When you extend the centre column up for the full height things begin to look a bit perilous as the Vitruvian tripods are very vertical - lacking the leg angle adjustments offered in my old tripod. The centre column does have a bag hook which lets you add mass to stop any camera shake - I found the legs so stable I'm not sure you will need it that often though.

In the bag is a short centre column you can swap out the longer one for which will allow you to get the tripod very close to the ground; there were no instructions on how to swap the head at all in my box / bag though. It doesn't look difficult but seems a strange omission. If you want to you can remove the centre column and convert it into a monopod; which feels like a gimic but if you are in places that don't allow tripods might give you an edge without having to pack a separate monopod for your trip.

Taking the tripod out and about is a delight as the low weight reduces fatigue as you go; if like me its going into your suitcase it won't eat into that checked in or overhead locker allowance. My older GTMT9340B has lasted me well; but its outclassed by the carbon fibre and compact shape of the Vitruvian tripods
Comment Comment | Permalink

GoPro Tripod Mount
GoPro Tripod Mount
Offered by Camera Shot
Price: £7.90

4 of 6 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Quick release + Tripod Mount 5*, 30 Mar. 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: GoPro Tripod Mount (Electronics)
This pack contains two well made but barring the tripod connector very plastic tripod adaptors; and so although the price is quite reasonable; its a lot for a few grams.That said the GoPro tripod mount kit gives you both connectors you might be looking for; a smaller mount you can connect to go pro type connectors; and a larger quick release mounting plate. Depending on what you are connecting to each has its benefits; I first used the quick release plate on a Veho Timelapse accessory; whilst the quick release plate is too large mount on my security camera suction camera mount; the accessory connector mount fit perfectly.

I like the flexibility of getting both mounts; though it should be slightly cheaper; I love the quick release plate for it's ease of use. 5*

Official Xbox One Stereo Headset Adapter (Xbox One)
Official Xbox One Stereo Headset Adapter (Xbox One)
Offered by Gameseek
Price: £21.51

6 of 11 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars I feel mugged, 15 Mar. 2014
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
The official xbox one stereo headset adaptor brings back the audio jack type connector Microsoft removed from the xbox ones controller. Using it is a question of upgrading your controller (a first for me) by connecting it to your console with the provided usb cable. When you connect the console prompts to update the controller. Besides the USB cable in the box is jack reducing cable for people on 2.5mm cables. Once that is done connect a headset to the jack input and you are away. On the adaptor are controls for adjusting the game and chat volumes independently as well as a mute button.

In use it worked fine that the Adaptor costs almost 1/2 the price of an entire controller is a joke; the adaptor should have been in the box.
Comment Comments (3) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Mar 15, 2014 11:23 AM GMT

Philips CorePro LED 4 Watt GU10 Energy Saving Bulb, 4 Pack
Philips CorePro LED 4 Watt GU10 Energy Saving Bulb, 4 Pack
Offered by fiducia-shop Preise inkl. MwSt

5.0 out of 5 stars Cool Blue, 13 Mar. 2014
Customer review from the Amazon Vine Programme (What's this?)
The core things to know about the core pro GU10 LED lights are; they are very easy to install. GU10 uses a push and twist connector to install and remove the bulbs. Removing my bulbs was a question of removing the old lamp security holder and then push and twist to swap them out and then replace the security holder. The whole process took less than 30 seconds even on my first go. Unlike the halogen lights the LED bulbs don't require safety measures to handle them; the LED bulbs at most get a little warm whereas the halogen bulbs get super hot. Not getting hot allows the LED lights to save a LOT of power in use; though not getting hot they are a little cooler than the bulbs they replaced.

The philips bulb is a direct replacement for my original bulbs; the only difference is these slightly cheaper philips LED lights aren't dimmable - I have put them on my stair well so that isn't the end of the world for me. They are slightly more blue than the lights they replaced but it doesn't cause things to fluoresce as I have seen some cheaper bulbs do.

You pay a slight premium to get Philips written on electronics; but usually its money well spent; and the case of the Corepro that is definitely the case.

Sony RX10 Cybershot 20.2 MP Digital Still Camera with 3-Inch LCD Screen
Sony RX10 Cybershot 20.2 MP Digital Still Camera with 3-Inch LCD Screen
Price: £659.00

11 of 17 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent still and Camcorder, 10 Mar. 2014
Customer review from the Amazon Vine Programme (What's this?)
Sony are on a role with their 20 Megapixel 1” sensor and Bionz processor compact cameras. They are slowly delivering a series of Camera’s appealing to all kind of photographers but consistent in their exceptional image quality. From the high end point and shoot RX100/ii and the quirky Camera for Phone’s QX10. The 1” sensor from these previous incarnations is shown again and again to be outstanding in good to moderate light but isn’t great as the ISO settings ramp up; but consistently better than smaller censored compact cameras.
The Sony RX10 takes that sensor and puts it in a easy to hold solid Magnesium; semi weatherproof DSLR alike zoom body. Size wise its pretty close match to the Canon’s tiny 100d SLR. Only the RX10 has a large attached lens sticking out of the front.

The Lens
The lens stretches from 24 to 200mm; and has three excellent features -
1) The aperture (can be) fixed; which means you can zoom in and out and not have to change your camera’s settings if you are in manual mode. The low aperture number also means you can get some control of the depth of field of the shot; you can focus on a subject and have a degree of background blurring enhancing the focus on your subject. The low aperture number also lets you shoot in lower light conditions.
2) There is a built in neutral density filter (a bit like a pair of sunglasses for your lens. This lets you reduce the amount of light hitting the sensor allowing you to use the F2.8 even in bright light.
3) The lens has outstanding image stabilisation that make using the 200mm end of the zoom sharper; and allows you to shoot video that doesn’t make you seasick.
4) Direct access to aperture control in some modes via an aperture ring on the lens.
The lens is branded Zeiss which under other circumstances could be a dilution of the brand; in this case it takes very nice; sharp images under a wide range of circumstances.

The Body
In the RX10 sensor combined with the lens makes a great combination for most all shooting scenarios - the weakest are Lowlight and Macro photography. Sony have then put it together with a camera body that lets you grow with it. If you are coming from a compact camera there is a zoom switch; if you are used to working with an SLR you can twist the lens barrel to zoom in and out. (Coming from an SLR I found the zoom a little slow - especially when twisting the barrel.) You can shoot in two full auto modes letting the camera make the decisions. As you grow you can try partial control Aperture and speed priority modes; or switch to full manual when you are happier with how it all works.
That support for growing is covered in the menu’s too; over time you can customise the buttons on the camera to suit what you need for shooting stills or video. This customisation is fantastic as Sony’s camera menus can be baffling; though the addition of a quick FN menu on the RX10 makes common tasks much easier to use.
The camera doesn’t have the look through the lens feature of an SLR but replaces it with an excellent electronic viewfinder; when i was in Buxton i walked up a hill and using the EVF could clearly see the faces of people I was taking pictures of. It also had a built in level making it much easier to level the horizon. The viewfinder activates as you bring it to your eye; though its very sensitive so when you use the bright back panel it often switches to EVF when you hold the camera body too near yours.
One feature I adore is that the RX10 recharges using USB without the need of a separate battery charger giving me one less thing to put in the bag.

Getting used to using the camera I have taken it out on two excursions into the Peak District as well as shooting around my home City of Leicester; shooting the Town of Buxton and the hills and valleys of Millers Dale. In the country the 24mm wide angle takes very nice landscapes; and when you want super wide angles you can use the built in sweep panorama mode to take a super wide image.
In daylight the images are very sharp; though as the day comes to an end the small sensors ISO abilities are pushed to the limit and you get a lot of noisy grain (when shooting raw- the Bionz processor smears the JPG images to remove the noise as best it can) (compared to my SLR) in your images.
Despite the 2.8 aperture subject isolation; where the image is focussed on the subject and the rest of the image is blurred out only becomes possible at high zoom magnifications; which isn’t terrible for shooting portraits but does cause a perspective distortion.
Street Photography didn’t reveal any great weakness in the autofocus; which did a good job focussing on faces and at wide angles was nice and quick; as was taking a photo.
I haven’t had time to get to a sports events so went out and took pictures of moving cars; the RX10 can manager 22 frames at 10 FPS in JPG mode and 6FPS when shooting raw images (when testing with a Sandisk Extreme SD Card.) The autofocus carries on running with this which means the last image is as well focussed as the first. The zoom is likely not long enough for anything but indoor type sports though (sit nearer the action to get a better image.)
Shooting video outside in windy conditions resulted in some wind noise but it was controlled thanks to the built in level meters helping me set the recording volume. The zoom is fairly quiet - but you still need an external microphone to remove it completely. The image quality at 1080p is excellent at 24 and 60p; the latter allowing you a degree of slow motion shooting. (In lower light drop down 24p and you will get a much better image.) If you don’t need a 500x super zoom on your Camcorder; or are a Journalist the RX10 is far superior to the last Canon and Panasonic Camcorders I have tried. There are microphone and headphone adaptors on the camera; as well as level controls that let you adjust the sound as you shoot - this will appeal to people shooting. One thing you can remove the sound of is the aperture control; on the base of the camera you can switch it from clicking or smooth mode.
Im torn on my summary of this camera is for people thinking about buying an SLR but not wanting to spend their life’s savings all at once on lenses for all their photographic situations. If that is you I can’ recommend it enough - you get 85% of the benefits of an SLR in a small body with an excellent lens. Its very good at stills and substitutes as an excellent camcorder. The Zeiss lens covers most of the bases for a non professional photographer or for video / journalists needing good still and video abilities.
My experience of using an digital camera’s though is that sensor’s get better every year ; so if you plan to replace your camera every 3 years your next camera is far superior when it arrives. When you buy an RX10 your money is split between the sensor and the lens both of which are excellent hence the higher price; your investment besides selling it on using amazon marketplace is all but lost.
If you go down the SLR or mirror less compact camera route the len’s you buy today can often be used on the camera you buy tomorrow meaning your investment isn’t lost as it will be with the RX10 (especially if you buy 35mm Full Frame lenses.)
Comment Comment | Permalink

Page: 1-10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21-30