Shop now Shop Clothing clo_fly_aw15_NA_shoes Shop All Shop All Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop Fire TV Shop now Shop Fire HD 6 Shop Kindle Paperwhite Shop now Shop Now Shop now
Profile for SmokeNMirrors > Reviews

Personal Profile

Content by SmokeNMirrors
Top Reviewer Ranking: 6,284
Helpful Votes: 916

Learn more about Your Profile.

Reviews Written by
SmokeNMirrors (London)

Show:  
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
pixel
Government Circles
Government Circles
by Colin Andrews
Edition: Paperback
Price: £9.77

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The official response to a modern phenomena of potentially life-changing significance, 27 Dec. 2010
This review is from: Government Circles (Paperback)
...as always, negative, secretive, and with a view to control. Why can't they grow up, and allow the human race to grow up?

Colin Andrews, principle crop circle researcher and the man who originally coined the phrase "crop circle", shows very clearly the huge level of interest taken in the supposed non-phenomena of crop circles by the British Government, and the deliberate policy of disinformation & deceit by the government & military at every possible stage since the early 1980s. The obvious question here is, if this non-phenomena truly IS of no interest to the government, and if they are, as they have always publicly claimed, doing no research on the subject because it is of no significance, why have they went to such lengths to create such a maze of disinformation, lies, and diversions to throw Joe Public off the scent whilst at the same time demonstrably doing exactly what they say they are NOT doing including spending a huge amount of public money on research?

Genuine "crop circles" exhibit such artistry, size, and sheer perfection, often containing geometric patterns of such complexity that only computers can simulate, which in and of themselves seem to preclude any notion of their having been created by any human hands let alone a couple of hired (not tired, although that too...) old men with a stick and some string. I refer of course to Doug & Dave and others of that painfully inadequate ilk. Additionally, genuine formations contain evidence of certain anomalies which to many prove beyond doubt that they are not created by human hands, for human-made attempts never contain these effects. Some of those anomalies are:

No tracks leading to or from genuine formations. Formations formed some time within 30 minutes in some proven instances, despite huge size. No half-completed or "practise" formations found. Near-total perfection in the precision and layout of geometric shapes (those we can actually understand, that is!)

Plants not flattened and damaged but folded over and interwoven intricately in the most amazing patterns; where they are folded the stems are somehow biologically altered and healed, and the growth rate of these plants is significantly increased. Additionally, the growth rate for a linearly-decreasing distance around the formation is also superior to distant growth.

There are also what appear to be steam release holes blown in the then-healed bent-over nodes of some plants which often still thrive. These appear to attest to the presence of some kind of heat energy, possibly microwave.

Magnetic anomalies in and around formations. Microscopic magnetic spheres of unknown origin are left scattered in the soil. It is unknown whether it is these, or something else, which also creates huge variations in the magnetic field in and around the formation, with North fluctuating up to 15 degrees from true at times.

Light anomalies; photographs taken within newly-formed formations often show multiple ghost images which seem to be only explainable by variations in the speed of light within the formation itself.

There are possibly even aerial anomalies and/or gravitational anomalies: On the 22nd of October 1987 a very bizarre event occurred in the air over southern England. A Harrier TR5 vertical take-off jump jet disappeared during a test flight over the Salisbury Plain military zone in Wiltshire. As the jet approached Boscombe Down airbase, radio contact went dead and the aircraft went missing. A full land, sea and air search was launched. The Harrier was eventually spotted by an American military aircraft flying over South Wales. The American pilot spotted the Harrier flying on a set course and moved in alongside it sending a radio report of his finding. The canopy of the plane was shattered and there was no pilot flying the Harrier indicating the pilot had ejected out of the plane through the canopy.

The media named the Harrier the Ghost Plane. The plane eventually ran out of fuel and crashed 300 miles out into the Atlantic Ocean. The plane had flown over three series of crop circles and the body of the pilot was later found very close to a set of circles. Although the presence of circles was not that unusual in that area at that time of year, a dead pilot was.

Whilst of course there is no proof the ejection was caused by the formations, it is interesting that the military then approached the author for information about unexplained anomalies around these formations. He shared information on associated electromagnetic anomalies and various other phenomena, as they were investigating all possible explanations for the strange series of events including why the pilot was ejected from his craft through the canopy. An explanation was never found and the verdict was left open.

One of the strangest aspects of the whole story was that the pilot's body was found in such a place as to indicate he had ejected a second or two before flying over the formations, and that the course track appeared to show the Harrier was on auto-pilot and that it actually changed course a fraction of a second before flying over the centre of the three formations. It then remained unchanged again until it ran out of fuel. Unconnected? I am inclined to think not - the course change just before the formations is very obvious on the course track. Buy the book to read the full story.

Additionally there are "balls of light" often witnessed before and after new formations and caught on video camera a few times. There is also no explanation for these.

Put together, the anomalies listed above, and others not mentioned, together with the geometric perfection and apparent encoded mathematical references added to the apparent speed of creation, as well as the official response, all seem to suggest these formations are created by some kind of intelligent, or intelligently-guided, energy of some description which currently appears to be beyond our scope to comprehend or explain, except at least to suggest it appears to be totally benign. That the genuine formations are works of art of precision and perfection totally unsurpassed in human experience has become lost to the world of art due to government deception and their attempts to keep the phenomenon under wraps via the tame media. That they may contain the key to currently unimaginable technology is unfortunately lost on the public who are happy enough with their Play Stations and flat-screen TVs, happily lulled into brain-dead oblivion by Big Brother.

My own personal belief is that this phenomenon is an attempt by another intelligence far in advance of our own to educate the human race to look beyond our petty differences and to cast off the shackles of our current inadequate physical science and start to think in four-dimensions (and possibly more) and more specifically, in terms of tetrahedral physics as it applies to planetary mechanics. The decoding of these formations should be one of the human race's most important tasks, for within them may lie the key to free energy and easy inter-planetary propulsion. NASA Space Shuttle video footage caught an apparent missile fired from earth ("Star Wars" weapon system?) at an object flying sedately at approximately 60,000 mph (around 40,000 mph faster than the fastest human-made object) in low earth orbit which then performed a 14,500 Earth-gravity turn and accelerated in under 2 seconds to approximately 250,000 mph, making the missile appear to stand still. This is just a hint of the potential of a higher technology; who knows just how great its potential truly is? These things are all connected, either directly or indirectly, and as always The Controllers are trying their best to keep these amazing things from the public.

As a small taster of some of the things NASA and others are keeping from you, search on YouTube for the following videos (these are the actual search terms; choose the first result in each case):

UFO Government 'Star Wars' Missile Video Debunked
UFO NASA's unexplained tether overload incident
NASA STS-75 "Tether Incident" - UFO flightpath tracking/stabilization (Extended Version)

Also check out the documentary Crop Circles - Quest For Truth (2002). Let the truth come out. Buy the book, download the documentaries and spread the word.


RHS Encyclopedia of Plants and Flowers
RHS Encyclopedia of Plants and Flowers
by Christopher Brickell
Edition: Hardcover
Price: £22.75

23 of 23 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The perfect home plant encyclopaedia, 27 Dec. 2010
Firstly I'm reviewing the 2006 edition.

Two-thirds glossy paper with lots of photographs, with expanded sections on common families, and the remaining 1/3 plain given over to the Plant Dictionary and glossary. Well laid-out introductory sections with good explanations and lots of beautiful colour photography, making identification and comparison easy. Sections include:
Preface
How to use the book
Plant names and origins
Colour in the garden
Plant Selector
Plant Catalogue
Plant Dictionary including common names
Glossary

The Plant Catalogue is divided into the following sections:
Trees
Shrubs
Roses
Climbers
Perennials
Annuals & Biennials
Rock plants
Bulbs
Water plants
Cacti and other succulents.

Each section includes easy-to-understand explanations about classification and identification, etc. The Plant Dictionary is a complete listing of more than 8000 plants suitable for growing in temperate gardens worldwide. It includes full descriptions of the characteristics and cultivation of over 4000 plants not already covered in the Plant Catalogue. The 2010 edition includes an additional "how to" section covering aspects of cultivation, pruning and care, etc.

One of my all-time favourite books and an essential addition to the home library.


Giant with Feet of Clay, The: Raul Hilberg and His Standard Work on the Holocaust (Holocaust Handbook S.)
Giant with Feet of Clay, The: Raul Hilberg and His Standard Work on the Holocaust (Holocaust Handbook S.)
by Jurgen Graf
Edition: Paperback

14 of 27 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Difficilis est satiram non scribere, 17 Dec. 2010
Raul Hilbergs monumental work "The Destruction of the European Jews" is generally considered the "definitive" version of events pertaining to the putative Jewish Holocaust. Yet it takes Jurgen Graf only 128 pages to show with blinding clarity that Hilberg's "definitive" work should truly be considered one of the great works of fiction of the 20th Century. In order to prove this extraordinary crime, the murder of the population of a city with a population nearly twice that of Berlin, one would expect an extraordinary investigation. As his contribution to that extraordinary effort Raul Hilberg relies almost exclusively on the one form of evidence which is generally considered in courts of law as the weakest and which, without any corroborating documentary or physical evidence, is considered worthless: eyewitness testimony. In many cases the witnesses and participants are unnamed. Often these eyewitnesses fatally contradict each other. And Raul Hilberg uncritically swallows, as Graf puts it, toad after toad; some of the more nasty-tasting are pointed out by Graf who subsequently, using actual documentary evidence in the form of letters and orders issued by Himmler and other top Nazis, shows that the concentration camps were crucial to the German war effort and that the Nazi high command went to great lengths to improve the living conditions of prisoners. No-one is suggesting, or has ever suggested, that no Jews were badly treated during World War 2. However, there is a whole world of difference between forced labour and ghetto-isation, and deliberate extermination; there is lots and lots of evidence of the former, and almost zero for the latter. This despite the fact that large amounts of records fell intact into Soviet hands as they over-ran eastern Europe in 1945.

Those who support the extermination thesis of the Holocaust are often embarrassed at the total lack of documentary evidence for any orders, budget or organisation for the Nazi "death industry" and have resorted to a hedge whereby they basically read into any document exactly what they wish it to say, thus entirely innocuous conversations are twisted around to say things they clearly did not say at all. And whilst there is a total lack of documentation supporting the extermination thesis there IS authentic documentation aplenty which demonstrate clearly the truth, that is, the concentration camps suffered large numbers of casualties, in total probably around 350,000, mostly due to epidemics such as Typhus; a large number of these, maybe as many as 1/3, died in the last 4 months of the war as the German infrastructure crumbled and the Allies gallantly guarded the prisons whilst the starving, diseased prisoners died like flies. On 26th October 1943, at a time when Hilberg tells us 4.3 million Jews had already been exterminated and the extermination of 800,000 more was yet to come, Oswald Pohl sent a general notice to the commanders of 19 concentration camps as the culmination of a long discussion among high-ranking Nazis, fully documented by Graf, in which he stated:

"In the framework of German armaments production, thanks to the improvement efforts that have been undertaken in the past 2 years, the concentration camps have become of decisive importance in the war. From nothing we have built armaments works that are second to none. We now have to redouble our efforts to make sure that the production levels so far achieved are not only maintained, but further improved. That will be possible, as long as the works and factories remain intact, only by maintaining and even improving the labour capacity of the prisoners. In earlier years, given the re-educational policy of the time, it did not matter much whether or not a prisoner could perform useful work. Now, however, the labour capacity of the prisoners is important, and all measures of the commanders, director of the liaison service and medical doctors should be extended to maintaining the health and efficiency of the prisoners. Not from phony sympathy, but because we need them with their arms and their legs, because they must contribute to a great victory for the German people, we must take the well-being of the prisoners to heart. I want this to be the primary goal: no more than 10% of all prisoners should be unable to work due to sickness. All responsible persons should work together to achieve this goal. This will require:
1) proper and fitting nourishment,
2) proper and fitting clothing,
3) utilization of all natural health measures
4) avoidance of all effort not necessary for the performance of work,
5) performance bonuses."

In the absence of any surviving documentary evidence of the quality of the above to support one of the central questions of the Holocaust debate, especially when that question is conclusively answered by the above letter, what does Hilberg resort to? In 1983 he had the effrontery to write: "[...] what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy."

It has been pointed out that the last thing one could ever expect from a bureaucracy was a meeting of minds and telepathy. Difficilis est satiram non scribere -- it is difficult not to write satire. It would be difficult to find any clearer display anywhere than these few sentences of the total bankruptcy of the orthodox historiography of the "Holocaust", together with their figurehead, the Holocaust Pope, the Giant with feet of clay, Raul Hilberg.

Note: A properly formatted Kindle version is now available for download from the Internet Archive.
Comment Comments (7) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Jun 17, 2015 8:10 AM BST


A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon - moonmovie.com
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon - moonmovie.com

5 of 11 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Yet more proof, if it were needed, that the Apollo missions were faked, 15 Dec. 2010
This is not the best documentary in the genre, but it does contain some rather explosive evidence against the official version of events, and the movie maker has to be commended for the way he confronted the liars who pose as lunar astronauts. Aside from most of the standard points noted the golden nugget consists of video footage of the astronauts clearly in low earth orbit taking pictures of a transparency of the earth over a backlit window in order to give the impression that the earth was photographed whilst very far away. That this really IS a true record of events is confirmed by the actual mission photography; for anyone who doubts this, try this very very simple test:

Got to Google & search for "Apollo Image Atlas". Select the first Google result, then select 70mm Hasselblad, Apollo 11, Magazine N. Scroll slowly down the images showing the earth getting successively further away until you get to those numbered from AS11-36-5382 to AS11-36-5399 showing the astronauts inside Apollo, allegedly something like 150,000 miles from earth. How is it possible that blue light is visible through ALL the windows which are visible in those pictures? Where does the blue light come from if they really are in deep space halfway to the moon?

Another simple test:

Go to Apollo 11, Magazine S, image number AS11-40-5930 (indeed, any similar image showing an astronaut's shadow from behind like this will do, they all have the same problem). At the bottom of the page click on the link to see the Hi Resolution Image(s), then save the image to your PC. Open the image in Windows in Paint Shop Pro or PhotoShop or similar, or open it in Linux with Gimp. Create a negative of the image, then zoom in to the rocks in the right and the left of the image. You will see indisputably, especially clearly in negative as the shadow shows up as stark white, that in the left of the image the shadows are on the right side of the rocks, and on the right side of the image the shadows are indisputably on the left of the rocks. In the foreground they go from south to north. Additionally, there is a very obvious "hot spot" around the astronaut shadow's head, which again can be more clearly seen in negative. This is indicative of a bright spotlight behind the astronaut's head, whilst the shadows running in different directions are proof positive multiple light sources either side of the camera were also used. If the sun really was the only source of light on the moon (and the Apollo missions took NO extra lighting with them) then all shadows should run parallel and there should be no hotspots, as the sun is the same distance away from all objects on the moon.

If you cannot explain why these problems exist when they should not (without resorting to MythBusters....!!!), you need to think seriously about the content of this video, and others which are far better, because these government-sponsored hoaxes come directly out of YOUR POCKET! And especially for those in the US, don't forget you are about to cough up countless billions more to "go back to the moon" in 2018, when we KNOW it is impossible using current technology. Note that the objection "the images have been digitally enhanced" does not explain the observed effects. Digital enhancement should not change the direction of shadows, and nor can it contribute to an illusion of blue light where there should be black space.

The best video on the subject is without a doubt What Happened On The Moon, which is accompanies the book Dark Moon: Apollo & The Whistle-Blowers by Bennett & Percy. Another very good book on the subject is One Small Step? : The Great Moon Hoax and the Race to Dominate Earth from Space by Gerhard Wisnewski. This video, whilst not the best, is a valuable addition to the mountain of evidence accumulating against the official version.

Arthur Schopenhauer said "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Unfortunately for NASA, the cat is out of the bag and it is now only a matter of time before the truth is accepted as self evident by all, even those with a desperate NEED to believe: we did not, we CAN NOT go to the moon using currently available technology because, very simply, we cannot hope to survive the radiation ever-present in space and made even worse close to earth by the madness of NASA & the US DoD in 1962 during Operations Argus & Starfish Prime.

Note: this is the very first review on Amazon.co.uk. I am curious how long this first review will be the only review; my prediction is that within 48 hours there will be at least one 1-star review from a NASA supporter. But I bet he does not address the points raised in this review. :-)
Comment Comment (1) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Jan 30, 2015 10:13 PM GMT


NASA mooned America
NASA mooned America
by Rene'
Edition: Unknown Binding

1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Yet more grist to the mill: the Apollo missions were faked., 15 Dec. 2010
This review is from: NASA mooned America
Concise and to the point, with lots of illustrations, this book asks lots of questions which NASA to this day has not adequately addressed. Whilst not delving too deep into any particular subject the author raises many questions which I have not seen given the analysis they deserve elsewhere. But I suspect this was Ralph Rene's whole point, to expose the simple fact that, if the Apollo missions HAD happened as we are told, none of these doubts should exist, and the fact that there are so many questions simply raises the implausibility bar that much higher for the official version of events.

I would also like to issue a challenge to anyone reading this who has never had cause to doubt the official version of history that I myself also once believed. Try this simple test and use your own judgement:

Go to the Apollo Image Atlas (Google it), select 70mm Hasselblad, Apollo 11, Magazine S, image number AS11-40-5930. At the bottom of the page click on the link to see the Hi Resolution Image(s), then save the image to your PC. Open the image in Windows in Paint Shop Pro or PhotoShop or similar, or open it in Linux with Gimp. Create a negative of the image, then zoom in to the rocks in the right and the left of the image. You will see indisputably, especially clearly in negative as the shadow shows up as stark white, that in the left of the image the shadows are on the right side of the rocks, and on the right side of the image the shadows are indisputably on the left of the rocks. In the foreground they go from south to north. Additionally, there is a very obvious "hot spot" around the astronaut shadow's head, which again can be more clearly seen in negative. This is proof of multiple light sources, as in a studio set; if the sun is the only source of light then ALL shadows should run parallel and there should be NO hotspots.

Another major flaw with the imagery is to be found in the very first magazine from Apollo 11. As you scroll down the images showing the earth getting ever further away look closely at the images numbered from AS11-36-5382 to AS11-36-5399. These all show bright blue light coming through the windows. This is surely not possible if the craft is in deep space halfway to the moon.

If you cannot explain the presence of these effects, which should not exist if the official story is true, then I recommend you read this book, or Dark Moon: Apollo & The Whistle-Blowers by Bennet & Percy, or One Small Step? : The Great Moon Hoax and the Race to Dominate Earth from Space by Gerhard Wisnewski.
Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Oct 19, 2014 7:51 PM BST


The Moon Landing Hoax: The Eagle That Never Landed
The Moon Landing Hoax: The Eagle That Never Landed
by Dr Steven Thomas
Edition: Paperback
Price: £7.99

10 of 21 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Don't waste your money on this Establishment tosh, 14 Dec. 2010
This book is not a serious attempt to discuss the anomalies in the Apollo hoax but rather it is an attempted hatchet job whose sole intent is to raise straw-man arguments and then shoot them down. It is not scholarly or well researched but instead resorts to the same tired old polemics and circular logic that all pro-Establishment hatchet jobs employ, and it doesn't do a very good job of debunking anything apart from itself. There is a very very simple way to see for yourself if the Apollo record can be believed. Use your own judgement in this easy 2-part test.

Go to the Apollo Image Atlas at [...], select 70mm Hasselblad, Apollo 11, Magazine S, image number AS11-40-5930. At the bottom of the page click on the link to see the Hi Resolution Image(s), then save the image to your PC. Open the image in Windows in Paint Shop Pro or PhotoShop or similar, or open it in Linux with Gimp. Create a negative of the image, then zoom in to the rocks in the right and the left of the image. You will see indisputably, especially clearly in negative as the shadow shows up as stark white, that in the left of the image the shadows are on the right side of the rocks, and on the right side of the image the shadows are indisputably on the left of the rocks. In the foreground they go from south to north. Additionally, there is a very obvious "hot spot" around the astronaut shadow's head, which again can be more clearly seen in negative. This is indicative of multiple light sources, as in a studio set; if the sun is the only source of light then ALL shadows should run parallel and there should be NO hotspots.

Another major flaw with the imagery is to be found in the very first magazine from Apollo 11. As you scroll down the images showing the earth getting ever further away look closely at the images numbered from AS11-36-5382 to AS11-36-5399. These all show bright blue light coming through the windows. This is surely not possible if the craft is in deep space halfway to the moon.

If you cannot answer why these effects are possible given what we are told you need to seriously re-examine everything you think you know about the subject. But this book is not a good place to start: don't waste your money. Try instead Dark Moon: Apollo & The Whistle-Blowers by Bennett & Percy, or One Small Step? : The Great Moon Hoax and the Race to Dominate Earth from Space by Gerhard Wisnewski.
Comment Comments (17) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Jul 16, 2013 9:09 AM BST


What Happened on the Moon [DVD] [Region 1] [US Import] [NTSC]
What Happened on the Moon [DVD] [Region 1] [US Import] [NTSC]

2 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Questions the validity of the official record of mankind's putative vist to the moon, 13 Dec. 2010
This DVD is an accompaniment to the book Dark Moon: Apollo And The Whistle-Blowers by Mary Bennett & David S. Percy. The DVD is split into 3 main sections:
1. Deals with the demonstrably false lunar photography.
2. The dangers of space radiation and the lunacy of those who insist that space is a benign environment.
3. The evolution of the rockets involved and the problems encountered - and never solved - during research.

For anyone who doubts there are any major flaws to be found in 1., try this simple test. Go to the Apollo Image Atlas at [...] select 70mm Hasselblad, Apollo 11, Magazine S, image number AS11-40-5930. At the bottom of the page click on the link to see the Hi Resolution Image(s), then save the image to your PC. Open the image in Windows in Paint Shop Pro or PhotoShop or similar, or open it in Linux with Gimp. Create a negative of the image, then zoom in to the rocks in the right and the left of the image. You will see indisputably, especially clearly in negative as the shadow shows up as stark white, that in the left of the image the shadows are on the right side of the rocks, and on the right side of the image the shadows are indisputably on the left of the rocks. In the foreground they go from south to north. Additionally, there is a very obvious "hot spot" around the astronaut shadow's head, which again can be more clearly seen in negative. This is indicative of multiple light sources, as in a studio set; if the sun is the only source of light then ALL shadows should run parallel and there should be no hotspots.

Another major flaw with the imagery is to be found in the very first magazine from Apollo 11. As you scroll down the images showing the earth getting ever further away, how strange then that the images between AS11-36-5382 & AS11-36-5399 all show bright BLUE light coming through the windows? This is only possible if the craft is in LEO. The list goes on. The DVD lists a large number of related anomalies which show beyond any doubt that the public record of the Apollo missions is not a true and accurate record of those missions.

For those who insist upon perpetrating the idiocy that, as far as radiation goes, space is a benign environment, the DVD also shows that this is sheer lunacy. Again this is laid out in far more detail in the book. NASA has consistently lied about the true state of the radiation belts, including the newly-created artificial belt, that encircle the planet since their own criminal folly in 1962 - exploding nuclear weapons into the belts to try to blast a passage through them during Operations Argus & Starfish Prime - and has even went to the lengths of revising the extent of the Van Allen belts (with no good reason given) to a THIRD of the size established by Dr. James Van Allen in order to minimise the perceived radiation exposure risk to the astronauts. That the Apollo astronauts displayed average daily radiation doserates lower than astronauts on low earth orbit Skylab missions is in and of itself proof that these astronauts did not go through the belts, and deep space, and walk on the moon (the surface of which itself is now thought to be highly radioactive! according to NASA itself), then return through deep space and the radioactive belts again.

The third part of the DVD looks at the development, or, more correctly, the lack of development, of the US rockets and documents the high-level collaboration between the supposedly implacable enemies via the ever-accommodating United Kingdom, often in the shape of Jodrell Bank.

The DVD does not go as far as the book. The central thesis of the book is that we DID go to the moon, just not as described. The DVD does not go into this in any detail, but in its own right it conclusively demonstrates that the public record of the Apollo missions is false. For anyone who insists it is some kind of heresy to make such a suggestion, please explain how it is possible to see shadows from opposite directions when there is supposed to be only one source of light, and also how is it possible to see blue light out of ALL the windows when allegedly halfway to the moon? If you cannot answer these things simply and logically then you need to watch the video.

For anyone who is interested, the book actually suggests, backed up by some very compelling evidence, that there WAS a manned lunar mission. But only one. The authors suggest this was a joint US-Soviet mission with a Soviet Soyuz providing the transport and returning to earth, and with the American astronaut essentially on a suicide mission in his one-man LEM. The Soviet cosmonaut who drove the Soyuz was supposed to be Pavel Ivanovich Belyayev. Note that this very link-up was announced publicly in the late 1960s and was to happen by 1975; the authors merely suggest it happened a few years earlier than the USA & Soviet Union publicly say it did.

A strange tale, that of Pavel Ivanovich Belyayev. According to Wikipedia, Belyayev was selected for the space programme in 1960 after nearly fifteen years' experience in the Soviet air force and navy. He was originally to fly the Vostok 8 mission into Earth's Van Allen radiation belt, but this was cancelled. He died in 1970 from peritonitis that resulted from an operation on a stomach ulcer and is buried in the Novodevichy convent in Moscow.

How strange it is then, when one looks at the grave of Pavel Ivanovich Belyayev, that this man who apparently did nothing at all out of the ordinary has the most splendid grave out of ALL of the cosmonauts in Moscow's most prestigious cemetery, with a magnificent statue evocative of someone who has done something truly special. Also strange is the fact that, contrary to custom he was not cremated but was buried with full honours. And for what exactly was Pavel Belyayev awarded the Hero of the Soviet Union, Order of Lenin, Order of the Red Star, numerous medals and foreign orders for? He also bore the title of the Hero of Socialist Labor of Bulgaria, Hero of Vietnam, and Hero of Mongolia, and had a minor planet, 2030 Belyaev discovered in 1969 by Soviet astronomer Lyudmila Chernykh, named after him.

There appears to be no record of the US astronaut who in all probability died on the moon.

To find out the full details and the historical context of all that, read Dark Moon: Apollo & The Whistle-Blowers. To see all the proof you will ever need that the Apollo missions were faked, and badly faked, watch the DVD.


Omon Ra
Omon Ra
by Victor Pelevin
Edition: Paperback
Price: £8.99

3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Rich in metaphor, 12 Dec. 2010
This review is from: Omon Ra (Paperback)
The story is a supposedly fictional account of a young cosmonaut whose sworn oath that he would if necessary die for his country unfortunately must be fulfilled far sooner than he ever imagined it would when he is forced to train as a "suicide cosmonaut" in the Soviet space program. It transpires that, despite the fact that the USA has already visited the moon, the Soviet Union, at that time renowned for its use of automation, is in reality totally incapable of the simplest automation tasks and have instead been using the "suicide cosmonauts" to carry out the supposed automated tasks at the expense of their lives. For instance, in Soviet rockets, each separate stage needs to be fired by one poor cosmonaut who obviously dies in the process. Omon Ra (the main character) is to become the driver of a lunokhod (actually, cyclist...) vehicle when on the moon; his task is to pedal the vehicle far enough to deploy a radio beacon, then he must shoot himself. When the time comes he refuses to do so, with surprising consequences.

There is also a suggestion that the story, far from being completely fictional, is an allegorical account of the life and subsequent death of one Pavel Ivanovich Belyayev, a supposedly unknown Soviet cosmonaut who supposedly died of peritonitis in 1970. The suggestion was apparently confirmed by the author in conversation with another author. The story of Belyayev is a strange one; whilst he was apparently originally supposed to fly Vostok 8 into the Van Allen radiation belts, this was cancelled. Strangely, though, despite the fact that he apparently did nothing special, Pavel Ivanovich Belyayev was awarded Hero of the Soviet Union (March 23, 1965), the Order of Lenin, Order of the Red Star, numerous medals and foreign orders. He also bore the title of the Hero of Socialist Labor of Bulgaria, Hero of Vietnam, and Hero of Mongolia (quoted from Wikipedia).

And, contrary to general custom, cosmonaut Belyayev was not cremated, but buried with full honours in Moscow's most exclusive cemetery. Of all the graves of ALL the cosmonauts, his stands out as by far the most spectacular, with a magnificent statue, evocative of a man who did something truly special for his country in a way no-one else has.

So, this Pelevin "fiction" is, allegedly, a coded recounting of Belyayev's own journey as the only man in the history of the Soviet space program who truly went beyond the Van Allen belts and the protection of the earth's magnetosphere. This mission was, allegedly, a joint US-Soviet attempt to land one man (an American) on the moon in a one-way trip, with the Russian as the "taxi-driver" who actually returned to earth and later died from radiation sickness. The name of the alleged American astronaut is, of course, unknown. This version necessarily suggests the Apollo missions were all faked and the named astronauts never left low earth orbit. There is a strange twist also in the fact that the English version does not mention that the original Russian version contained a verse in English:

We're spaceward bound tomorrow
But there's no grief or sorrow
Alone in the sky
The Moon's riding high
You ripe ears of Barley, goodbye.

This also was confirmed by the author. I recite this information merely to lend a touch more interest to Pelevin's story. The circumstances of that other story can be researched independently by anyone interested. Pelevin's story in and of itself is very easy to read but hauntingly powerful.


Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of 'Truth' and 'Memory' (Holocaust Handbook)
Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of 'Truth' and 'Memory' (Holocaust Handbook)
by Germar Rudolf
Edition: Paperback
Price: £42.00

19 of 21 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Put aside your preconceptions and just read the book; you will be amazed how little you really know, 4 Dec. 2010
A superb, massively-documented and meticulously researched (in a way no official examination has ever been; what a surprise...) introduction to the Holocaust subject. It is essentially a collection of 18 essays, some of which are condensed versions of other books in the same series. Each and every one is well written (despite the translations), well presented and well argued: logically and scientifically, with evidence and references presented for every claim or counter-claim. There are none of the cheap polemics always employed by those who support the orthodox version; no ad hominem attacks, circular or straw-man arguments, or other diversions, whilst saying and proving nothing. Just a calm and dispassionate dismantling of a false account of history which must itself now be consigned to the history books.

The book is divided into the following sections. The titles are fairly self-explanatory. Each one is a detailed assessment of one small aspect of the overall story, the overall point being to ascertain technically what could, and could not, have happened, and what maybe did and what most definitely did not happen.

Introduction: The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews
The Case of Walter Lüftl · Contemporary History and the Justice System
The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust
Witnesses to the Gas Chambers of Auschwitz
The German Justice System: A Case Study
Holocaust Victims: A Statistical Analysis
The Gas Vans: A Critical Assessment of the Evidence
Do Photographs Prove the NS Extermination of the Jews? Air Photo Evidence
National Socialist Concentration Camps: Legend and Reality
Some Details of the Central Construction Office of Auschwitz
Some Considerations about the `Gas Chambers' of Auschwitz and Birkenau
The Crematoria Ovens of Auschwitz and Birkenau
The Gas Chambers of Majdanek
Diesel Gas Chambers: Ideal for Torture - Absurd for Murder
The Treblinka Holocaust
Babi Yar: Critical Questions and Comments
Reprisals and Orders From Higher Up
Appendix 1: Wood Preservation through Fumigation with Hydrogen Cyanide: Blue Discoloration of Lime- and Cement-Based Interior Plaster.
Appendix 2: Dissecting the Holocaust: Expert Report.
Appendix 3: Censorship in Germany? Never! Unless. A Brief History of Holocaust Revisionism.
Bibliography
Index

As an engineer of +25 years standing myself I have found the assessments are as balanced as possible; for example, in his chapter Diesel Gas Chambers: Ideal for Torture - Absurd for Murder Fritz Berg is very quick to point out that it is actually not impossible to kill people with diesel exhaust, although of course the overall thesis is that it IS impossible to kill people in large numbers in the manner described using diesel exhaust. At all times where there is doubt about the truth of a question the authors are forthcoming in pointing this out. One naturally wonders why similarly balanced investigations have not been carried out, and any suggestion of such is simply ignored, abused or twisted around to mean something else, by the supporters of the orthodox account to prove that the crime actually happened as described in the first place.

I have long been convinced that the holocaust story we are told we MUST believe did not happen. This from someone who once believed it so much he made scrapbooks about the subject, and had posters on his bedroom wall. I find it thus even more unfortunate that as time rolls on it seems a growing number of people believe that in fact the ONLY people who suffered during the second world war were the Jews. I have found myself only recently in the amazing situation where a general discussion about the numbers of people who were displaced during the war led to nearly violent accusations of anti-Semitism for belittling the suffering of the Jews - from nearly all of those involved in the discussion. How can this be when the real truth is that the sum total of actual evidence (material & documentary, as opposed to uncritically accepted and nearly-always contradictory eye-witness testimony) to corroborate the orthodox holocaust story is, amazingly, almost totally non-existent, as this book, itself only an introduction, shows in all too graphic detail? As an example of false history it is almost beyond parallel.

I urge anyone reading this to put aside any preconceptions you may have about the subject, and simply read the book, then form your own judgement. For anyone who has never had any reason to question the generally-accepted version of history I can guarantee you will be amazed at how little you truly know about the subject. I was. Once upon a time I believed history as told in its entirety. By my late teens I was a walking encyclopaedia of warfare in general and the 2nd World War in particular. I knew everything about it, from the technical specifications of most vehicles & aircraft (including experimental versions) to what the commanders ate for breakfast before major battles. Oh I knew it all!

Except the truth.

As an example, I personally was not aware until I read this book that not a single eye-witness to the putative holocaust had ever been cross-examined in court between 1945 & 1985. The first who were, Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba, at the first Zundel trial in Canada, quickly fell apart and admitted they had seen nothing. Vrba went so far as to admit he had used "poetic licence" in writing his book I Cannot Forgive. The whole thing became so farcical that the prosecutor Mr. Griffiths asked his own witness par excellence:

"You told Mr. Christie several times in discussing your book I Cannot Forgive that you used poetic license in writing that book. Have you used poetic license in your testimony?"

before dismissing him from the dock. Since then no witnesses have been forthcoming. Pretty staggering, really, when you consider how many times you have heard the idea that "thousands, if not millions, of witnesses exist"! So where are they all then?

Once again I can only urge you to read the book and make your own mind up. Remember that "history is written by the winners"; this means that by its very nature it is always one-sided. Just how lopsided the conventional view of history truly is, is often very quickly confirmed by a detailed technical evaluation of the evidence, or as in the case of the holocaust, the near total lack of evidence, that supports the conventional view.

A good indicator about the unreliability of "official history" can often be found in the refusal of those supporting this version to allow examination of, or even discussion of, the technical details to confirm if the events described were actually technically possible, even going so far as to enact legislation to prevent academic examination. As I remarked in a review of another book on the same subject, let's also be very clear about this: Those who refuse to debate, especially in a supposedly open society, even more especially when they insist they have truth on their side, refuse only when they know they cannot win - because they know they do NOT have truth on their side.

Note: A properly formatted Kindle version is now available for download from the Internet Archive.
Comment Comments (17) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Jul 24, 2015 7:25 PM BST


Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides
Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides
by Thomas Dalton
Edition: Perfect Paperback

34 of 42 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Truth needs no law to support it, 12 Feb. 2010
Even denial of the existence of god is not punishable under current laws. Yet this particular aspect of history is not open for question or debate, and IS reinforced by laws. Why?

One would have thought that the very existence of laws banning the dissemination of such information at all, anywhere, should be enough to have most supposedly intelligent people running for the nose plugs, but it seems we're so far gone in a make-believe world of "Homeland Security", "Al Qaeda" and "debt is money" that the masses have lost the ability to question, far less hold to account, the people who control their lives.

Any truth - or should that be "truth" - which needs to be enforced by law is by its very nature not truth at all - for if it were truth there would be no need for enforcement. Never has been, never will be.

Truth is simple, and it simply is. It's what happened. And what actually happened is always believable, even if sometimes worthy of further examination. It is only when man becomes involved that "what really happened" becomes distorted and no longer fully believable. This particular story - and let us be absolutely clear about this, it IS a story - is quite simply not believable. It has none of the hallmarks of a true story - the fact that 60 years after the event there are still huge doubts and very little (if any) actual evidence worthy of the name are fitting testament of this. This is exactly why it needs laws to support it. And thus we have our confirmation, if such is needed by any free-thinking human being in the enlightened 21st Century: the story is simply not true.

A superb and easy to read overview of the main points of the "Great Debate" ("Great Refusal To Debate"?); balanced, thoughtful and very thorough. A sterling job, Mr. Dalton. You don't know what you think you know about the "Holocaust" until you have read this. And it's all very easily verifiable - unlike the established historical account.

Let's be very clear about this. Those who refuse to debate, especially in a supposedly open society, even more especially when they insist they have truth on their side, refuse to do so only when they know they cannot win - because they know they do NOT have truth on their side.
Comment Comments (29) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Jan 29, 2014 12:40 AM GMT


Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10