Customer Discussions > television discussion forum

worst movie made in recent times & why!


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 51-75 of 157 posts in this discussion
Posted on 16 Feb 2009 11:33:49 GMT
Nugent_Dirt says:
Not one's mentioned this and that includes me..Interview With A Vampire. The title alone ranks as one of the lamest but the whole concept is feeble. Of course the abysmallly infantile source material is ultimately to blame and so is whoever thought it was a good idea to adapt this steaming pile of c@ck for the big screen.
The Green Berets - of course this B movie is infamous for it's gung-ho ism, and this leads me onto every film depicting the USA as saviour of the free world/planet whether based on real events like Saving Private Ryan or sci fi like Independence Day. It's less to do with the production values, acting etc than the fact that the US portrayed like the 7th cavalry coming to the 11th hour rescue of the rest of the world who are ever so grateful to the fabulous US of A

Posted on 16 Feb 2009 11:42:57 GMT
I was forced to watch bride wars with my girlfriend, it was hard to stay awake through such utter s**t. Not funny in the slightest and plotwise laughable, i suppose being a woman would help to enjoy it. I can watch chick flicks but that was something else!!!!!

In reply to an earlier post on 16 Feb 2009 11:46:53 GMT
EHHHH??????? Interview with a vampire is ok, not one of the best but watchable with plenty of angst and moral dilemma. What do you expect from a vampire movie lol!!!!

Posted on 17 Feb 2009 22:44:06 GMT
Lisa M says:
Lost in Translation. Tried to watch it twice and fell asleep both times. I thought it was totally boring.

Posted on 18 Feb 2009 14:52:04 GMT
H S Marks says:
there will be blood aka in the name of the oil field

Posted on 18 Feb 2009 22:50:46 GMT
Hollow man..... The acting is horrendous. The "horror" is unintentionally funny. Kevin Bacon sucks sooooo hard. It's been shown 1000 times on the tele where I live

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Feb 2009 11:31:24 GMT
Anthony S says:
YES - 'they' DO! - but - if one becomes pre-occupied with this rather pointless process of identifying ALL the WORST movies, it's easy to lose sight of the (relatively few) best!

I never cease to be amazed by Hollywood - over DECADES it has churned out utter garbage, often theatre-filling (!), by the cartload - never more so than now, as all these lists of 'worsts' attest - BUT - BUT - BUT - look at what it can also DO ..........

A few, chosen as they 'fall off the top of my head' & mostly recent (just easier to remember at my age!) - Charlie Wilson's War, Babel, Syriana, Goodnight & Good luck, Harry/Sally (of course), et seq., - dozens more over those same decades - subtle, hilarious, gripping, 're-watchable' again & again - the CONTRAST with the rubbish is mind blowing - HOW is it possible?

I will never understand how both can emerge from essentially the same studio groups - all I can really think is - thank heaven they STILL DO, & long may it continue (although it is sometimes easy to imagine that global, 'bums on seats' dross could take over the world!?)

Posted on 19 Feb 2009 12:12:05 GMT
Last edited by the author on 19 Feb 2009 12:16:28 GMT
Ratcliffe says:
i have an amazingly long list :] moulin rouge, i just dont get the singing, the same with mamma mia and high school musical. stardust was pretty c**p, i actually fell asleep in the cinema. ummmm... indi jones was pretty bad, it was like they had copied and pasted bits out of other films and given it another name. but i think mamma mia was the worst, all my friends actually got up and sang half way thorugh and i thought i was gonna die

Posted on 19 Feb 2009 13:38:17 GMT
A lot of people seemed to be complaining about films just because they don't like them. If a film delivers exactly what it promises it isn't crap just because it isn't to your taste. A musical will include people singing, an Adam Sandler film will be infantile comedy. The further down the list of sequels you go the more of a shoddy imitation or parody of the early films they become. Why do these basic facts surprise people?

Posted on 19 Feb 2009 13:53:21 GMT
Pirates Of The Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest - Absolute nonsense. No coherent story, far too overlong and therefore ultimately boring 'action' scenes and some not very funny humour. The worst experience I've had at the cinema, this really was a cash in of the highest order.

Ocean's 12 - Absolute nonsense. No coherent story, lots of 'in' jokes... some not very funny humour. Appalling. The 2nd worst experience I've had at the cinema, this really was a cash in of the highest order.

Posted on 19 Feb 2009 19:43:08 GMT
J. McDonald says:
Bonfire of the Vanities; Glengarry, Glenross; Truly, Madly, Deeply; Ordinary People; anything with William Hurt; Dead Poets Society; Good Morning Vietnam; The Haunting (Liam Neeson one); Star Trek the Motion Picture; Citizen Kane (boring, arty-farty and utter rubbish); Pearl Harbour (could somebody tell wiggy-boy Ben Affleck that he can't act?); Exorcist II; Vampires (the Carpenter loud music made me queazy); 30 Days of Night (night rhymes with s****); Ocean's 11 right through to Ocean's 27; Godfather III (was Coppolla asleep during the making of this?); Oh I could go on and on. The fact is, for every good film there are probably a thousand crap ones.

Posted on 19 Feb 2009 21:15:30 GMT
Frog says:
My personal favourites (not!) are Braveheart and Rain Man. Sorry chaps, just not my cup of tea.

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Feb 2009 22:13:53 GMT
R. Kroell says:
10000 bc! That was crap. Emmerich always copies scenes and themes from other great and good movies. He copies other directors. And the cgi are awfull. In Godzilla it allways rains to hide the bad SFEX.

In reply to an earlier post on 22 Feb 2009 08:18:50 GMT
Rubia Murphy says:
This was an awful film. And as for the skull!!

I don't do blockbusters anymore - they're mostly hype and generally rubbish. Save for a few children's films oddly. But this last Indy film smacks of cashing-in and jumping on a very lucrative bandwagon. Shame on the lot of them. The only high point for me was John Hurt's acting.

Posted on 22 Feb 2009 11:34:05 GMT
clw says:
Bloodrayne ! Absolute crap. bad acting, bad script , bad everything. I saw it a long while ago but cannot forget how bad it was.

In reply to an earlier post on 22 Feb 2009 11:44:34 GMT
S. Wright says:
Hmmm missing the point, it about a robot that discovers the human concept of love, basically a futuristic version of Pinochiccio, and just because it shows a vision of the future that is dark, and to us impossible, doesn't mean that something similar may not happen. Im pretty sure that the concept of robots, flying machines etc was just as impossible for someone to visualise 300 years ago, have an open mind.

In reply to an earlier post on 24 Feb 2009 00:08:40 GMT
K. Evans says:
Spelt should be spelt correctly

Posted on 24 Feb 2009 16:06:24 GMT
J. Thomson says:
Went to see Be Kind Rewind - that's an hour and a half of my life I'm never going to get back. What was the point Jack Black!? Also The Happening was the most awful thing I have ever seen in my life. Someone told me it was supposed to be 'thought-provoking' but I think they may have lied.

Posted on 24 Feb 2009 17:48:20 GMT
Seen some really bad movies, but i nominate " ISLAND".
It was like watching one long commercial break !
Rog.

In reply to an earlier post on 25 Feb 2009 10:22:48 GMT
zargb5 says:
"i am legend" what a waste of my life that was. Read the excellent book instead of the same name by Richard Matheson

Posted on 25 Feb 2009 11:48:34 GMT
Chris Millar says:
Alien Vs Predator 2 will always rank as one of the worst films ever in my opinion, especially considering how great the opportunity was. In fact, it's just rank...

In reply to an earlier post on 28 Feb 2009 14:47:30 GMT
Yeah there's a good 2 hours of my life I'll never see again, never understood the hype about the book saw the documentary which only served to muddy the waters even more with psuedo science and religous mumbo Jumbo, but the real stinking pile was the movie my god has there ever been a more self absorbed piece detritus put on the screen ?
Cole

Posted on 28 Feb 2009 15:53:06 GMT
Leytonboy says:
Hancock ! What a load of rubbish. That is all ! wasted enough time on it already.

Posted on 28 Feb 2009 17:07:36 GMT
Paul Dixon says:
all those michael bay so called re imagining of classic horror movies,texas chainsaw massacre,friday 13th and next up to dig up and bury a nightmare on elm street,without robert englund,pathetic.
best movies ive seen recently gran torino
the wrestler
and bolt

In reply to an earlier post on 1 Mar 2009 00:52:14 GMT
Indy Was Bad And It Just Reeked As A Pilot/Dry Run for An Indiana Jones Jr Film Series Of His Son's Adventures.
It's Predictable And Seeing The Son Swing Through The Trees Like Tarzan?
The Last Bond Film (QOS), It Wasn't Like The Rest In That M Is Only Ever Seen In Her Office, But She's Seen Here On Site. What MI6 Boss Ever Left Their Office? It Was Not Bond Like, In That You Could redub And Give Him any Name And There Would Be No Difference.
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the television discussion forum (582 discussions)

 

This discussion

Participants:  124
Total posts:  157
Initial post:  23 Dec 2008
Latest post:  4 May 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 2 customers

Search Customer Discussions