Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 238 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 14 Feb 2014 12:45:48 GMT
Stu says:
Well folks basically are we all going to do what the american poster suggested next time she appears with her post, and that is report her for abuse like they did to get rid of her from their forum?

Posted on 14 Feb 2014 13:09:34 GMT
[Deleted by Amazon on 14 Feb 2014 13:12:35 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:15:32 GMT
Stu says:
Hi Bearman, it was that just lately posters were going on about how disgusting her posts are, and she ought to go back to the us of a. Knowing that is not on Ithought I would ask how many were serious about getting rid of her like the american guy said.

Posted on 14 Feb 2014 13:18:03 GMT
[Deleted by Amazon on 14 Feb 2014 13:22:00 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:23:01 GMT
Stu says:
I think he used just one or two words too many to describe what her posts are Dan.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:25:35 GMT
Spin says:
Stu: if you want to rid these threads of "disgusting" posts I suggest you begin with the more odious home-grown posts contributed by the forum mafia. There are one or two UK posters on these threads who are far more abusive than mkm.

Posted on 14 Feb 2014 13:27:12 GMT
Last edited by the author on 14 Feb 2014 13:28:07 GMT
A poster that hateful is never going to delay her date with deletion for long.

When that day comes, perhaps the spectacle will encourage certain others to mend their ways.

If not, no loss.

Posted on 14 Feb 2014 13:28:00 GMT
Dan Fante says:
The so-called Buddhists on these threads are a huffy lot.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:34:10 GMT
Bearman says:
I am sort of surprised they deleted that post - I have said far worse things about her in the past.

Posted on 14 Feb 2014 13:39:24 GMT
Spin says:
Mkm is not abusive. There is no reason to report a poster for "abuse" simply because one disagrees with their views. How can an alternative ideology to ones own be considered "abusive"?

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:43:55 GMT
Bearman says:
Spin, if you were gay I think you would consider her statements that gays are paedophiles to be extremely abusive.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:45:09 GMT
Last edited by the author on 14 Feb 2014 13:47:01 GMT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:45:49 GMT
Dan Fante says:
He's trolling by proxy.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:49:02 GMT
Bearman says:
I disagree

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:49:41 GMT
Stu says:
Most of her posts are homophobic,bigotry,support the nazi's,and claims to see ufo's and aliens spin,and boy anyone who does not see her views is put to the sword.

Posted on 14 Feb 2014 13:56:01 GMT
Whatever happened to freedom of speech?

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 13:57:02 GMT
Spin says:
Sty: But there are two specific UK posters on these threads who are homophobic fascists, and three specific posters who are extremely offensive to other contributors but you revel in communicating with them. Why do you consider mkm to be abusive but not them?

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 14:25:47 GMT
Stu says:
Firstly spin mkm posts general posts usually aimed at no poster, the other aims their posts at each individual that responds,so it is up to that poster to complain regarding the post. Now the three atheists who have a go at yourself in particular,it is your position to complain regarding the offensive posts that have a go at you personally instead of your posts on a regular basis, I hope you understand what I mean by all of that.

Posted on 14 Feb 2014 14:26:47 GMT
Dan Fante says:
Ooh, I hope I made the top 3 (or 2).

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 14:40:45 GMT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 15:31:06 GMT
I have already started stu, I now just await Gills to tell us were fascist for censoring her, and that will be the icing on the cake.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 15:31:54 GMT
kerching....

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 15:34:20 GMT
If and when it happens then it will set a welcome precedent, the line should be drawn between commenting on post content, and general comments based on a posters persona and history on here, as opposed to the kind of homophobic bigotry we see from certain posters here, which simply is hateful and immoral.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 15:35:21 GMT
Stu says:
Did you start with her last post Sheldon?

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2014 15:35:25 GMT
Is it really fair to paint them all with that particular brush, I mean if someone tried to make any kind of analogous connection between me and gills I'd be mortified. ;-)
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


More Customer Discussions

Most active community forums
Most active product forums

Amazon forums
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  religion discussion forum
Participants:  20
Total posts:  238
Initial post:  14 Feb 2014
Latest post:  21 Feb 2014

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 2 customers

Search Customer Discussions