Customer Discussions > politics discussion forum

If the Pariah state of Isreal Nuked Syria: Why no condemnation from our media?


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 109 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 8 May 2013 15:38:26 BDT
Pipkin says:
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/
May 7, 2013

Is the glassing of Damascus underway?
Israel just cut Syria off the web, possibly because of the nuclear attack video (in the link) that got out. It is highly probable now that Israel is going to use this blackout to prevent ANYONE from posting more about what is going on with the attacks. What more can we expect after what Israel already did? The following graphic shows that Syria was taken offline at around 2:40 PM GMT on May 7th. Expect the worst, the Zionizts are FAMOUS for mass annihilations, most notably the 40 - 70 million the Bolsheviks murdered in Ukraine and their recent use of nukes on Syria proves they are STILL nuts. Falluja, Jenin and Abu Ghraib also come to mind . . . . . . take a look at those Jenin pics to see how desperate a few of Israel's victims really are. Here is the graphic that proves Syria has been taken off the web. WE NEED TO KEEP AN EYE ON WHAT HAPPENS TO IRAN NOW

Nuclear rogue
Those of you who are new to this site probably do not realize exactly how censored your news is. I suggest you read the following to find out. Yes, they absolutely WILL try to hide a nuclear blast, provided Israel did it and the target was Arabs.
"The real issue at hand now is that Israel has proven itself out in the open, under documented irrefutable conditions, that it considers nuclear aggression acceptable policy. This means that for as long as Israel exists it is a menace to the world. It is fairly well accepted that Israel caused the Indonesian tsunami, nuked Bali, caused the Japan tsunami, nuked Fukushima, and FINALLY, because an Arab set a decent camera up at exactly the right place and time, and had the balls to post the video immediately, it is proven and not a guess that Israel is a nuclear rogue.

I did not get the best screen grab for what I showed in my initial analysis, and when I was doing further work on this report, I landed on the holy grail - the moment of criticality. I did not know the camera captured this. Here you can see that even in the part of the frame that was not the sky, even in the shadow areas, there was so much light that the camera sensor clipped to itīs maximum value at all sensor sites. You can extract this frame from the cleanest version of the original video, Here is the most pristine version of the original video ever posted by the man who shot it. I made sure this got preserved. A powerful computer or advanced video editor will help. You wonīt be grabbing this frame with an old Celeron.

I cannot begin to emphasize enough how impossible it is to clip a camera sensor to maximum, even in the shadow areas. This means that even the windows in the buildings took in so much light that the normally dark area inside the buildings which would make the windows appear dark got so much light that even the super dark areas clipped the sensor. The sun will not do that, even with a massive over exposure. The only thing that will do that is a nuke, which is well known to be brighter than the sun.

This is the proverbial "no damage from a 9.0 earthquake, other than tsunami damage" proof that is needed to show this was a nuke. Anyone should be able to understand this, and you donīt need to know photoshop, you donīt need to know focal lengths and lens behavior, just look at the frame grabs below. They say it all and you do not need to be an expert to see it.
See the links.
The following captures give you a clear reference for what is happening in the frames above. Put your finger on one of the flames in the frame above to see where it is in the picture while the light of the nuke is still overwhelming the camera so badly it cannot see that flame. How bright is the sun? Would that camera be able to see a fire at high noon? Obviously yes, and this proves that even after significantly fading, the nuke is STILL brighter than the sun.

There is only ONE THING WE KNOW OF, THAT CAN LIGHT THINGS BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN. THIS ALONE IS PROOF ISRAEL NUKED SYRIA

We now know what a nuclear attack looks like for real, and it is surprisingly Hollywood. We also know now that EMP is B.S., and that an ordinary camera can survive filming it. As I have always said, nuclear EMP is a HOAX that is going to be used as an excuse to get rid of technology via Intel CoreVpro processors, other 3g enabled processors, and via the 3g connections ALL AUTOMOTIVE CONTROL COMPUTERS AFTER 2004 HAVE ON ALL THE TIME, as well as smart meters which can probably command appliances to auto destruct, which will be used to fake the public into believing a nuclear EMP wiped everything out when in fact it was only the zionists using decades old 3g technology to tell everything to self destruct with a system we all forgot about. And THAT is how they will throw us back to the stone age, and accomplish our final enslavement.

This video is proof positive that our electronics are NOT susceptible to nuclear EMP, a fact I have been harping for a long time now, and all it took for me to know was to put pen to paper and calculate it out.

EMP fear mongering is a mind game, to get people to waste their efforts on that which is irrelevant.
EMP from a nuke is a threat to ONE thing - a device hooked up to a wire over a mile long that has no protection circuit. Nuclear
EMP needs a conductor with a cross section a mile long to couple with, itīs all very easy math. Your car, your laptop, your cell phone is immune, simply because it is too small to take in the signal. Power distribution systems, phone systems, ethernet computer networks with no fiber optics, and cable TV systems can be damaged but even then it is not likely, the nuclear tests of the 40īs 50īs and 60īs took place amidst power lines and phone networks, and the ONE time anything did get blown out it was a rotary multiplexer at a small local phone provider. Our modern stuff is far more robust simply because over time it was improved to survive lightning strikes.

But nuclear EMP is not the issue here, IS IT?
Iīd say NO. The real issue at hand now is that Israel has proven itself out in the open, in documented irrefutable conditions, that it considers nuclear aggression an acceptable policy. This means that for as long as Israel exists, it is a menace to the world.
It is PROVEN BEYOND ALL DOUBT AND NOT A GUESSING GAME THAT ISRAEL IS A NUCLEAR ROGUE. I gotta laugh - it was their "eternally illiterate mud hut goat herder" patsy that nailed them. Hey Israel, WHO ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BE TRUSTING WITH A BOMB?? Looks like the movie Airplane and many others were nothing but like fantasies. The damage you caused to the reputation of others while being even WORSE filth yourselves is the pinnacle of all hypocrisy.

Even more damning is the blackout in the media - all forms of it. I can excuse some of the alternative media that has limited staffing for missing this, but CNN, FOX, AlJazeera, ABC, NBC, CBS, ALL latino news outlets, EVERYTHING "mainstream" has staffing good enough to know what went on, and their silence is absolutely DAMNING.
It proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that we are all wrapped up in a blanket of zionist lies, disinfo, and SILENCE.

May 6, 2013

I was taken offline to prevent this from being posted. I am back, for who knows how long . . . .
They destroyed 2 cell modems over this, and I am now running on backup modem 2. This is important to "them", they did NOTHING over the boston bombing reportage, why did the following get their hackles up so bad they acted so strongly to prevent it from being posted?

The information blackout is telling, this explosion never got mentioned AT ALL in the Mexican press, which is reporting zero about ANYTHING happening in Syria right now. WHY???
Perhaps because Israel owns the worldīs media, and wants silence with regard to their nuclear war crimes?

Posted on 8 May 2013 18:32:15 BDT
Pipkin says:
Work on this is in progress
May 5, 2013,
Don't expect the "official" truth about anything from Damascus
The first casualty of war is the truth, so the best thing to go on is the videos individuals have posted to Youtube, and the blast effects. I am holding my ground - Earthquake and then blast means bunker busting nuke that breached the surface. On top of that, the scale of a couple of those blasts was beyond conventional. There were eyewitness reports that one of the mushroom clouds generated it's own lightning.

First thought of the day - Israel is sucking the t*t of terror by milking sympathies from the Boston bombing and sprinkling a little bit of that terror milk on Damascus, GOTTA GIT DEM AYERABS IN SYRIAH!. Yep, they just did idiot Joe proud.

Erik posted to the forum - "Criminals who carry out the "prophecies" of their own apocalyptic scriptures are like serial murderers who select their victims by following patterns in a phone book and claim that it is therefore inevitable."

LesMajeste posted to the forum - ""The hand of God?"

I see the bloody hands of mass murdering lunatics, desperate to protect their world-wide scheme of wealth theft thru their central banks fiat money frauds.

May 4, 2013
The following may be used to provide plausibility for an "islamic" nuking of America by Israel TOMORROW OR MONDAY, As stated by Pamela Rae Schuffert, KEEP AN EYE ON THOSE JEWISH COMMUNITIES IN AMERICA!

Israel is now bombing Syria
Regardless of what the media says, Israel struck FIRST.
All rumor until confirmed true, however, this is the chatter
"Israel dropped a nuclear class weapon on Damascus, mushroom cloud so big it sparked it's own lightning. Two Israeli jets shot down, anti aircraft batteries responding"

My comment - It really appeared to be at least a kiloton class weapon, with a mushroom cloud at least a KM high.

"earthquake preceeded blast"

My comment - Ok, the attack may have been nuclear, because it shook the ground FIRST, and then the "blast" penetrated the surface where it was observed by people on the ground. NOTE - this is not the blast in the video below.

RT is reporting a dead journalist, with surviving journalists thus far seeing over 300 dead. If that many dead are seen this soon, the actual count will be in the thousands until the divide by a thousand factor is thrown in by the spin team, official "dead" will likely be fewer than 20.

Another round of attacks by Israel is underway. It is now being reported that Syria has been forced to declare war on Israel

Israel is confirming the loss of two planes, and also confirming they are bombing Syria.......

Israel has cancelled all schools tomorrow and told all people to stay home from work in case Syria attacks back

The Aleppo airport has been completely obliterated

All power out in the entire Damascus metro area after latest round of Israeli airstrikes

Several Syrian military divisions completely wiped out, plus a key military airport not in Aleppo

If Syria declares war on Israel, ''in response to being bombed'', the U.S. will step in to "defend" Israel's aggression.
If Israel bombed FIRST, then America is defending an aggressive nation. That's all there is to it.
And if Syria does not respond, Israel will proceed to flatten them.
All is fair on the playground I guess, where bullies prevail and World War 3 is sought by the bankers at all costs.

I have found a way to totally circumvent Youtube. Please give feedback in the forum if it worked or it did not work.

An explanation of the "Allahu Akbar" statements in this video - The blast was so big that the people you can hear did not know if they would be dead when the shock wave arrived so they professed their belief in God before possibly dying.
Shills are commenting that Muslims LOVE explosions, so they were praising God because they saw one, but it is obvious that in fact they thought they might be dead.

Here is a direct link in case the window below is defunct. The fire is from a previous bombing run, the big blast is near the end, this proves Israel is using the largest ordnance there is. This was filmed from approximately 3 kilometers away.

The video has been removed because it was auto starting on some systems.
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

Posted on 10 May 2013 00:59:30 BDT
Simple, because the jews own and run America.

Posted on 10 May 2013 08:51:18 BDT
remember the delibrate bombing and attack of uss liberty off the coast of gaza strip .1967 over a hundred sailors were killed or injured . no action taken against the attackers by rest of the world why ..

Posted on 12 May 2013 09:41:34 BDT
Is this a thread for anti-Semites only, or can normal people post here as well?

In reply to an earlier post on 12 May 2013 09:48:38 BDT
Define normal?

In reply to an earlier post on 12 May 2013 15:27:35 BDT
S. P. Jones says:
"Define normal?" What Margaret Phelan isn't.

Posted on 13 May 2013 19:24:24 BDT
Last edited by the author on 13 May 2013 19:24:56 BDT
'Define normal'

Person or persons not prone to paranoid delusions and persecution mania and people who don't worship fascist dictators.

For starters.

In reply to an earlier post on 13 May 2013 20:46:39 BDT
Ah....yes....a definition that is open to interpretation....totally subjective....nice!

In reply to an earlier post on 13 May 2013 22:28:12 BDT
David Groom says:
Simon DHB,

'Ah....yes....a definition that is open to interpretation....totally subjective....nice! '

Not so. It's a definition based on observation and clear evidence, plus a basic knowledge of human nature.

In reply to an earlier post on 13 May 2013 23:40:27 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 13 May 2013 23:42:16 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 14 May 2013 04:39:36 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 14 May 2013 07:55:02 BDT
Last edited by the author on 14 May 2013 07:55:40 BDT
erm ...there is no condemnation in the media , because simply put. israel has not nuked syria. discussion over.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 May 2013 09:22:10 BDT
Last edited by the author on 14 May 2013 09:22:27 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 14 May 2013 09:26:52 BDT
Dan Fante says:
The thread title makes no sense if you want to be pedantic.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 May 2013 14:34:18 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 14 May 2013 14:56:12 BDT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 15 May 2013 07:19:09 BDT
MarmiteMan says:
Yes. Methinks career anti-Semites would then moan because their raison d'etre was suddenly diminished ...

In reply to an earlier post on 15 May 2013 12:12:45 BDT
Spin says:
Marmite: I'm not sure about that. Anti-Semites are usually also racist, homophobic and obsessed with physical and mental perfection (despite their own defects in such an area). I have never encountered a person who was solely an anti-Semite, but I have met anti-Zionists whose belief is concerned only with an opposition to "Zionism" with no prejudice against race, sexual orientation, or physical/intellectual abilities.

In reply to an earlier post on 15 May 2013 14:26:09 BDT
David Groom says:
Simon DHB,

'David Grime...only maths is objective...the rest...all open..'

Of course, maths is the only totally objective discipline, but when a proposition is put up, we can all examine it in detail and make judgments based on experience, the evidence etc. However, all positions that cannot be mathematically proved are not equally valid, so, concerning the point made here, I am content to consider it as being on the jury led basis of 'beyond reasonable doubt.'

In reply to an earlier post on 15 May 2013 15:24:28 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 15 May 2013 16:36:13 BDT
Spin says:
Simon: because it was the reasonable thing to do given the vacuity of the argument...

In reply to an earlier post on 15 May 2013 21:22:21 BDT
Reasonable....do any of you buffoons understand your own 'native' language?

Posted on 15 May 2013 21:57:03 BDT
Charlieost says:
I watched the news tonight presuming that if Damascus had been nuked then somebody might have noticed, it isn't Milton Keynes after all. Anyhow, nobody had. Perhaps Margaret, it was a very small nuke. C

In reply to an earlier post on 15 May 2013 22:46:46 BDT
David Groom says:
Simon DHB,

'Reasonable....do any of you buffoons understand your own 'native' language? '

I've sat on 3 juries and the judge always explained the concept in nice plain English for us all to understand, so I have no problem with the idea or my understanding of it. Can't speak for anybody else though.
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


ARRAY(0xa94933f0)
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  politics discussion forum
Participants:  30
Total posts:  109
Initial post:  8 May 2013
Latest post:  17 Jul 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 5 customers

Search Customer Discussions