Customer Discussions > politics discussion forum

Financially rich homosexual couples are usually the ones surveyed in gay adoption studies --UNFAIR!


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 112 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 12 Jul 2014 17:06:35 BDT
A man named Walter Schumm showed this a few years ago. He pointed out that gay adopting couples surveyed very usually had 200 thousand US dollars* (or more )a year coming in. Even gangsters with millions can raise well adjusted kids.
*Applicable in UK Currency equivalent!

Posted on 12 Jul 2014 19:02:29 BDT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 12 Jul 2014 19:17:27 BDT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 12 Jul 2014 19:28:17 BDT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 12 Jul 2014 20:45:11 BDT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 12 Jul 2014 21:06:52 BDT
[Deleted by Amazon on 12 Jul 2014 21:15:32 BDT]

Posted on 12 Jul 2014 21:33:59 BDT
[Deleted by Amazon on 13 Jul 2014 17:47:10 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 13 Jul 2014 00:28:49 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 13 Jul 2014 03:10:05 BDT
Last edited by the author on 13 Jul 2014 03:13:08 BDT
That 200 grand mark minimum they usually made prerequisite to get interviewed gays at is often double what the average gay male couple makes in the US (according to some sources other say male gays are poorer on average but all sources usually agree lesbians make on much average less than straight ladies in jobs).

In reply to an earlier post on 13 Jul 2014 04:53:42 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 13 Jul 2014 11:52:14 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 13 Jul 2014 14:11:16 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 13 Jul 2014 14:38:50 BDT
What are you on about stephen?

In reply to an earlier post on 13 Jul 2014 14:40:42 BDT
Yep, I knew he was a slimeball from the first time ever I saw his face.

Posted on 13 Jul 2014 14:42:57 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 13 Jul 2014 16:15:07 BDT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 14 Jul 2014 05:20:59 BDT
Fair surveys only on adoption in the future!

Posted on 14 Jul 2014 12:16:25 BDT
Dan Fante says:
Aren't couples more likely to be better off if they're adopting in any case because of the strict criteria involved? I have no idea what the OP is actually trying to demonstrate anyway though. I suspect he doesn't either and he's repeating a convoluted argument from a biased source.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jul 2014 14:05:05 BDT
Garscadden says:
For two able bodied people at a point in life when they feel they can adopt, $200k doesn't seem that high. (Well, it definitely puts them in the comfortable range, but it's hardly 'rich')

Posted on 14 Jul 2014 16:17:23 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jul 2014 16:36:45 BDT
Garscadden says:
What do you mean by this? Or are you just spewing out random comments?

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jul 2014 17:00:07 BDT
Anita says:
The person in question is obviously not very well and can't be held responsible for what he says. It even feels a bit bad to make jokes about unfortunate Benny Hill or Lusitania. Have a look if you want:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/forum/meet%20our%20authors/ref=cm_cd_tfp_ef__np?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx3ETKKJQSTRPGM&cdPage=11&cdThread=TxZZZPUNAX17WX#CustomerDiscussionsNew

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jul 2014 17:49:15 BDT
He has a fantastic grasp,of the obvious!

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jul 2014 21:31:49 BDT
No worries, Spin will keep him company.

Posted on 15 Jul 2014 02:15:55 BDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


More Customer Discussions

Most active community forums
Most active product forums

Amazon forums
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  politics discussion forum
Participants:  13
Total posts:  112
Initial post:  12 Jul 2014
Latest post:  29 days ago

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions