Customer Discussions > politics discussion forum

Common Purpose


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 122 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 18 Nov 2012 21:58:29 GMT
Adam Jackson says:
Anyone know much about this organisation/think tank??

Ive heard some dodgy stuff about them (mostly from Brian Gerrish)

Posted on 19 Nov 2012 08:56:38 GMT
john walker says:
I think that Common Purpose is a very suspicious organisation. Something not quite right about them.

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 10:14:39 GMT
Molly Brown says:
Backed by Deutsche Bank, educating our leaders in how to serve their communities. A registered charity, still has charity status, unlike Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge. Bolstered by Tony Blair and New Labour, believes in the advancement of free speech under the Chatham House Rules, i.e. secret meetings. Sounds great? Maybe they have something to do with the economic mess we're in now, and have helped to create the new dictatorships of technocrats here and in Europe. Created I believe in 1984, how ironic.

Posted on 19 Nov 2012 10:21:49 GMT
Spin says:
So the conspiricy theory that our governments are being controlled by a shadowy organisation behind the scenes is actually true.

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 10:24:44 GMT
Molly Brown says:
What theory?

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 10:30:06 GMT
Spin says:
Molly: the theory that our world is governed by organisations behind the scenes. Some say they are aliens, some say they are Jewish billionaires, some say they are an ancient order of adepts to a mystical cause...etc etc. I must admit, though, that the title "Common Purpose" is a bit suspicious..

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 10:44:09 GMT
Last edited by the author on 19 Nov 2012 10:44:55 GMT
Molly Brown says:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2233681/Leveson-Inquiry-Mail-dossier-raises-disturbing-questions-influence-quasi-masonic-nexus-people-know-best.html

The Dail Mail seems to be questioning it too, but from their concerned and protectionist perspective for the "freedom of the press", and with regard to the forthcomings findings of the Leveson Enquiry.

Obviously, it seems, "commonpurpose.org" seem to have had, and still do have, great influence in many spheres of public life. As do many of these unelected and often secretive so called "think tanks".

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 10:47:38 GMT
Spin says:
Molly: I do not know much about "Common Purpose" but it does not surprise me that politicians and business leaders fall into that nonsense. In the US the right-wing christians have the Republican party by the nuts. So it does not surprise me to find out that even our leaders are being advised by weirdos.

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 12:31:57 GMT
Huck Flynn says:
ironic that we should be criticising a forum of "common purpose" comprising a loose group of nuts and weirdos :-)

Posted on 19 Nov 2012 12:37:36 GMT
Spin says:
Us normal weirdos do not spend time and money conditioning our politicians and businessmen into a certain frame of thought...This group actually advises on linguistics as well... It aims to change language and, therrfore, meaning. Have you seen our politicians using their thumb in a clenched fist to express a point? Why do they all do that? Think about it...

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 12:45:09 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 19 Nov 2012 12:46:32 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 12:57:19 GMT
Molly Brown says:
I resemble that remark, thank you. (But most of us here don't actually any power over anything really though, do we!!!). BTW, which one are you?

Posted on 19 Nov 2012 13:13:48 GMT
Spin says:
I have seen local community leaders emulating the behaviour of our conditioned politicians, not only in the art of answering a question without actually answering it, but also in the art of physical expression...And these "Leaders of government and industry" think they can con all of us on the recommendation of those they pay to teach them how to fool us?

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 16:30:19 GMT
Last edited by the author on 19 Nov 2012 16:33:44 GMT
Pipkin says:
Hi Spin,

http://cpexposed.com/about-common-purpose
About Common Purpose
Common Purpose is a political charity using Behavioural Modification
Common Purpose (CP) is a Charity, based in Great Britain, which creates `Future Leaders' of society. CP selects individuals and `trains' them to learn how society works, who 'pulls the levers of power' and how CP `graduates' can use this knowledge to lead 'Outside Authority'.

Children, teenagers and adults have their prejudices removed. Graduates are `empowered' to become `Leaders' and work in `partnership' with other CP graduates. CP claims to have trained some 30,000 adult graduates in UK and changed the lives of some 80,000 people, including schoolchildren and young people.

But evidence shows that Common Purpose is rather more than a Charity `empowering' people and communities'. In fact, CP is an elitest pro-EU political organisation helping to replace democracy in UK, and worldwide, with CP chosen `elite' leaders. In truth, their hidden networks and political objectives are undermining and destroying our democratic society and are threatening `free will' in adults, teenagers and children. Their work is funded by public money and big business, including international banks.

It is important for researchers on this site to realise that the majority of Common Purpose 'graduates' are VICTIMS, who have little if any understanding of the wider role of Common Purpose within UK society, nor of its connections to higher government and the European Union. Drawn into CP training by a flattering invitation, or selected by their company or organisation, this recruitment is normally carried out by a previously trained CP person - now recruiting for the cause. Candidates are screened and selected (or rejected) by CP Advisory Board members in their area.

Both candidates and 'trained graduates' will have no real understanding of Common Purpose's wider role to help achieve a political and social paradigm shift in the UK. The real objective, would appear to be to replace our traditional UK democracy with the new regime of the EU superstate.

By blurring the boundaries between people, professions, public and private sectors, responsibility and accountability, CP encourages graduates to believe that as new selected leaders, CP graduates can work together, outside of the established political and social structures, to achieve this paradigm shift or CHANGE. The so called "Leading Outside Authority". In doing so, the allegiance of the individual becomes 're-framed' on CP colleagues and their NETWORK.

Using behavioural and experiential learning techniques, the views of graduates can be remoulded to conform to the new Common Purpose. Most will not be aware this has happened, but we are given immediate clues in descriptions by graduates that Common Purpose training is 'life changing', 'disturbing, or 'unsettling'. Trained and operating under the Chatham House rules of secrecy (details of discussion, those present and location are not disclosed), CP graduates come to operate in 'their world' of Common Purpose. Please go to Document Library .......Category.........Mind Control Background on this site for historical information regarding manipulation of people's free will and behaviour.

The term 'GRADUATE' is used deliberately so as to prevent disclosure of involvement with Common Purpose. As 'MEMBERS' of CP, which is more appropriate, individuals in the public sector would have to declare their interests. So strong is the Common Purpose bond, that some individuals will lie to hide information and documents considered 'dangerous' to the CP cause. People challenging CP colleagues have been victimised and forced out of their positions.

Common Purpose is linked to a host of other suspect Trusts, Foundations, Think-Tanks, Quangos and so called Charities.
DEMOS is a key example. These organisations funnel political and social CHANGE policy through CP, to re-frame graduates. Examples range from promotion of Diversity in every company and organisation, to Curfews for young people.

Common Purpose promotes the 'empowerment of individuals', except where individuals ''challenge the activities of CP, and public spending on CP.''
These people are branded vexatious, extremist, right wing or mentally unsound.
Mrs Julia Middleton, the Chief Executive of Common Purpose, praises the work of German bankers. Deutsche Bank is, of course, a major power behind Common Purpose. Mrs Middleton, earning circa 80,000 p.a. from her charity, is also very happy to promote the term 'USEFUL IDIOTS' in her book 'Beyond Authority'. Are we the General Public the USEFUL IDIOTS, or are the Elitest Common Purpose Graduates? You must decide.

I recommend that you begin your research by clicking on the DOCUMENT LIBRARY button above and then selecting " Advice on Using the Archives". When you have read the brief introduction select the "CP Penetration UK" category. Here you can see diagrams of of the CP Network and a Map of Geographical Penetration of UK. The DOCUMENT LIBRARY, also contains documents, letters and emails as evidence of Common Purpose at work. The library will be regularly updated.

Please also click on GRADUATES on the top bar. You will be able to search for Common Purpose graduates in cities across the UK. Did you realise these people, possibly your colleagues and friends, were now 're-framed' "elite leaders". But overwhelmingly, you the taxpayer, have paid for their CP training. Interested? Annoyed? Happy searching.

The greatest evil is not done in those sordid dens of evil that Dickens loved to paint ... but is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clear, carpeted, warmed, well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices.--C. S. Lewis (Screwtape Letters). And we should remember that...Evil flourishes where good men do nothing.
............................
New World Order puppets then?

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 16:54:26 GMT
Spin says:
ME: so are you in favour of CP, or are you wary of it?

Posted on 19 Nov 2012 17:28:56 GMT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 19:09:12 GMT
Pipkin says:
Spin:
WARY.... or I would be if I knew what, where and who and how it affects me.
Can you make sense of what it is?
It smacks of another 'boy's club' to me. Like Cecil Rhodes and white supremacy.
''These organisations funnel political and social CHANGE policies,
So strong is the Common Purpose bond, that some individuals will lie to hide information and documents considered 'dangerous' to the CP cause. People challenging CP colleagues have been victimised and forced out of their positions.''

Why should any organisation hide any information if it is open and above board and for the greater good?
Why should anybody have priviledges over another, dependent on a special handshake?

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Nov 2012 19:16:46 GMT
[Deleted by Amazon on 19 Nov 2012 19:26:48 GMT]

Posted on 19 Nov 2012 19:57:41 GMT
Spin says:
Obviously ypu guys have no idea about political reality. No doubt you will be quoted

Posted on 19 Nov 2012 23:21:27 GMT
Last edited by the author on 20 Nov 2012 05:54:42 GMT
JimmyMac says:
Common Purpose, was originally an idea created by an even more insidious organization called, ....<The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations>....which is the Mother of all Think Tanks, and the Daddy of all brainwashing and propaganda institutions.
Google....Or Wiki' for more info'....

...When youve researched both of these very sinister organizations properly, you will never see the world in the same light again.
....................................................................
The Tavistock Agenda

http:www.youtube.com/watch?v=M131M0esWXM&feature=related

Posted on 19 Nov 2012 23:48:09 GMT
JimmyMac says:
The following is a description of "Common Purpose" by Brian Gerrish on his website UKCollumn.org

"Their love of themselves and power automatically means they will crush others who get in their way. I received a major piece of the puzzle when a friend pointed out that when they made public officials re-apply for their own jobs several years ago they were also required to do psychometric tests.
This was undoubtedly the start of the screening process to get 'their' sort of people in post".

If you've noticed a more aggressive or 'bolshie' attitude from your local Town Hall staff, it's probably down to Common Purpose.

In reply to an earlier post on 20 Nov 2012 01:04:01 GMT
freesia says:
Re-applying for own posts and psychometric tests have been and are being undertaken in the public and private sector for years! And not just for the "top" jobs. Mind you if they were created in 1984 that would just be about when it all started. So...i thought it was rubbish...but maybe not.

Posted on 20 Nov 2012 01:45:32 GMT
JimmyMac says:
The following is another interesting observation from David Icke, dated Friday 16 Nov. 2012.

Well, Well, Bell: Sir David Bell, leading light in the Leveson inquiry into press standards, is trustee of the group that produced the Newsnight interview which sparked the naming of former Thatcher treasurer Lord Mc Alpine.

Bell is a key advisor to Leveson and major player with Gov't insider Julia Middleton in the infamous Common Purpose, an organization long exposed by Brian Gerrish at the UK Collumn over many years and an organization that has regularly appeared in my books.

Common Purpose is handed Millions in taxpayers money to run "Training Courses for Leaders", at all levels of Gov't. Law Enforcement, the whole lot,- the 'system' in other words. They are developing system people, with system minds- this is why there has been such a transformation of the dynamic and relationship between the public and the personnel of the system.

Julia Middleton just happens to also be co-founder with Bell of the Media Standards Trust 'a lobby group behind a huge amount of evidence presented to the Leveson inquiry'. Two other Leveson advisers, former Ofcom Chairman Lord Currie and Sir Paul Scott Lee, former Chief Constable of West Midlands Police, have connections with Common Purpose.

A Daily Mail investigation 'has uncovered an incestuous network of political, business and financial links between Sir David, ex Chairman of the Financial Times, and individuals and organizations appearing before the inquiry to demand statutory press regulation.'

Sir David Bell is also a trustee of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, 'an independant not-for-profit organization', which was behind the interview with Steve Messham that triggered the Lord Mc Alpine saga that has led to the neutering of Newsnight and BBC. journalism in general.

British Mainstream Media, You Are Being Set Up With a View To Making You Impotent and Destroying Press Freedom.

CAN YOU SEE IT NOW?

GET OFF YOUR KNEES WHILE YOU STILL CAN.

Posted on 14 Mar 2013 00:18:11 GMT
Helen says:
A Common purpose but does not state what it is. From what I have read it is whatever purpose the creators want, and to achieve it the members are encouraged to act outside authority ie the law. They decide who will be the leaders, ie do what their purpose is - gag the press, whitewash education, change the legal profession, and then appoint their members to do this. If you are chosen to attend their courses you will find rapid promotion, but if you want out, your career will be ruined. They bestow power on their members regardless of their ability or qualifications, and they decide who the leaders will be, and what they will do. They do not satisfy the legal requirement for charitable status as they are secret. And nobody has heard of them, when you ask them. They are infitrating schools and universities- and particularly dangerous in our desparate, uncertain bankrupt society.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Mar 2013 16:50:05 GMT
Pipkin says:
I believe we agree Helen...
can I ask where did you get this info... I keep a file with all links in it.
Thank you,
Margaret.
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the politics discussion forum

Discussion Replies Latest Post
Why does the US have an army if they are impotent? 7 30 minutes ago
How Did the U.S. End Up Such A Slave to Bad Politicians and a Manipulative Media? 576 5 hours ago
Why is the UK supporting IS ( formerly ISIS) in Syria but opposing them in Iraq? 49 11 hours ago
Hyndreds of oeople atre beheaded or mutilated by Extremist communities every day so why the sudden shock and horror at the death of an Anerican journalist? 82 22 hours ago
Galloway 'Will Not Be Silenced' By Police Probe 7 1 day ago
The Death Penalty - Time To Bring It Back To The Table?? 538 1 day ago
Cameron says IS poses a real threat on the streets of Britain. But he will not deploy troops to combat this apparent threat.. 61 2 days ago
Most Active Forums 31 2 days ago
Banned In The U.S. Amazon Forums 3630 2 days ago
Suggested Solutions or Strategies? 37 2 days ago
What is it with the sudden interest in old threads? 19 2 days ago
Nick Griffin - time for action 321 2 days ago

More Customer Discussions

Most active community forums
Most active product forums

Amazon forums
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  politics discussion forum
Participants:  21
Total posts:  122
Initial post:  18 Nov 2012
Latest post:  1 Apr 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 5 customers

Search Customer Discussions