Much younger/older partners - Friendship/Romance: Beyond cut off yrs.

Ok, my interest is is now thoroughly piqued... this blog that Ian talks about, is there a link to it?

I'd love to know too. I've been trying to find the post that has the clues in.

[Deleted by the author on 4 May 2012 12:45:35 BDT]

AHA!

Drew,

Interesting eh!

I've deleted the post. If AJ pops up saying he missed it again, can you put up the reference for him. I'll be offline for a few hours mow.

Got it. I take it that the deleted posts were of a similar ilk?

AJ,

Yes. Once you have the name and location, finding all his other stuff is straightforward. You can also find out the significance of July 2011 and his sudden appearance here.

I had read some of his stuff when I dipped in to see how the American version of our threads were going. He seems to have been deleted around the same time he popped up here. Bit of a shame really as it makes it harder to go back and see the wopping he took on home soil. Well Notreshuggie for catching that one!

Odd that Tom isn't a Tom but a Paul, and Paul isn't a Paul but a John they can't seem to stick to their own names.

[Deleted by Amazon on 4 May 2012 17:29:09 BDT]

It is almost as if they are ashamed to stand behind their own words.

[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Hmm, seen the exchange on GDNE(3), interesting stuff. Missed the 12:37:41 post here - the joys of being in a different time zone and having an early night!

Hi Adam, I think all the important details have appeared on the GDNE(3) thread now. You can always do a bit of googling, if you're so minded, using the name.

You flagged up the fact that he slipped up and posted as Paul earlier in the thread.
(link removed)

It's a storm in a teacup, but fun while it lasted.

Hugh.

THREAD SABOTAGED and by inadequate men quite obviously, from near the end of the previous page. They`ve often little to say worth the saying when it comes to relationships, never mind the disparities of age within them! Meanwhile they carry on as eagerly as a bunch of ancient women on a coffee brake.
Please scroll back...
ThankyoU
www.celebritydiscodave.co.uk
Facebook: Kates David

Hugh, Aye, irrelevent in the scheme of things, but educational nonetheless; deleted posts on Feser's blog post-bootlicking were rather pitiable really, and the posts on 'the_religion_delusion' are rather familiar. It'll be interesting to see if there are further variations on 'I was using his computer' combined with threats of legal repercussions ... Bests, Adam.

Momma Amazon won't let me post my answer.
Sorry.

Currently: I`ve come to realise that thirty one has become the new twenty one both in terms of friendships and relationships: My closest female friend currently, of twenty eight years since birth, but actually considerably younger, is constantly "saved" by our friendship. To remind you, I`m of fifty six years. She benefits from me, as opposed thus far at least, to boyfriends of like years, in terms of both recovery of youth at extreme times, and it`s steady prolongation. Her latest pitfall was in terms of the process of conventional seduction, she fell foul to a process of shovelling of food. It may very selfishly reduce the competition, but it most surely is not the best approach when applied to a former model.

[Deleted by the author on 21 Jun 2012 18:06:42 BDT]

I found thirty years difference too great and I am living comfortably with a 20-year difference.
Are you aware of the life curves introduced by the psychologist Erikson?

You can read about him more here:
http://www.support4change.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47&Itemid=108

The point is that people in vastly different age groups have different ambitions, goals and expectations.
Being charming does not get you very far.

"THREAD SABOTAGED"

(Tumbleweed blows slowly past, in the distance a coyote howls.)

Life curves cannot be introduced by anyone, they either exist or they don`t, and nothing exists merely for reason of it having been written. We are individuals first and foremost, our respective periods of time since birth are reflected only in a vast array of differing real ages, ambitions, and aspirations. Generalizations play no part what-so-ever in creating circumstance between two unique individuals. Sophie`s ambition is to be successful, mine likewise. Sophie`s goal is for a normal life. the same goal which I share for her. Sophie`s expectation is that she should not be aged in this process. She wishes to remain as young as possible for as long as possible. This is also my objective. Guys of her own years generally tend to, through the implementation of the protocols of conventional seduction, rob her of her youth. I repair the damage that they`ve done, and then put her back on course. They age her whilst I keep her young. I reside mostly in her head whilst they apparently reside much more of the time merely in their own, in the world of their egos. We share very considerable empathy, empathy which has only been enhanced by way the circumstance of my having had greater, and not less, experience of life. Society tells us many things, and many of those things are on closer inspection found to be entirely wrong! In my opinion the better philosophers work with actual truths rather than merely what our minds would have us believe.

Your're not a philosopher. Just a creepy old git.

I am a philosopher, we all are, at least should be, younger it seems even now than you`ve likely ever been. You are beyond any doubt whatsoever a socioageopath, trust me, hehe..., a very envious one at that! This is exactly what so many genuinely young people require to be protected from, and at no matter what the cost. Such as you in society, your jealous, resentful, immature and prejudice mentality, goes a long way in the process of robbing this world of its otherwise youth. This mentality in society, this discrimination and prejudice, obliges the otherwise young to think themselves older than their real ages for fear of what others may think of them. When one both thinks and behaves older one fast becomes so.

This is of course the most thoughtful nature of contribution that you`ve ever been capable of here. Pity that you had nothing intelligent whatsoever with which to link it. You may likely double your effort now, hehe!! It serves no purpose at this point to engage any further in discussion with other than mature thinkers. I shall gladly respond to any and all what I consider to be mature questions, and even children themselves are capable of those.

Those of you new here should read from the beginning!

"I am a philosopher"

Oh, no you isn't! You is a complete and total eejit, wot makes up stoopid words, like a 12year old.

"so many genuinely young people require to be protected from";

Your leery, lusty, Uncontrollable Urges