Customer Discussions > high definition discussion forum

i am the only one?


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 49 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 3 Feb 2013 15:26:34 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 11 Feb 2013 09:13:26 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 3 Feb 2013 15:57:24 GMT
Le Blaireau says:
I think you should let others spend their money on what they want to spend it on, and you do the same. None of anyone else's business.

In reply to an earlier post on 3 Feb 2013 21:54:46 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:00:36 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 3 Feb 2013 21:59:02 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:00:50 GMT]

Posted on 4 Feb 2013 10:08:17 GMT
C. Gould says:
Then what was the point of this thread?

Posted on 4 Feb 2013 18:02:20 GMT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Feb 2013 19:35:12 GMT
Last edited by the author on 4 Feb 2013 19:35:55 GMT
Bourne1886 says:
Dwight's off on one again. Don't give him any excuses.

Patrik if you're happy with your current set up that's fine. But if you want top notch picture quality, a full HD TV and Blu-ray player are going to be much better quality than what you have now. There will be a massive difference between the two.

Dwight's talking Sh*etttttttt again. Please don't listen to him. He hasn't got a clue. He tried to play a Blu-ray in a DVD player once. He's not very good with technology bless him!

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Feb 2013 19:43:13 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:01:07 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Feb 2013 19:44:23 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:01:24 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Feb 2013 19:45:32 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:01:34 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Feb 2013 20:41:13 GMT
J.Yasimoto says:
I trust your computer screen is a green monochrome CRT? Because, you know, you don't need anything else. It's fine as it is. These modern ones give off too much radiation. And they're too bright. I should know. The radiation has caused me to grow a third eye. And all three eyes have retina damage from the excessive brightness.

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Feb 2013 20:45:56 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:01:45 GMT]

Posted on 4 Feb 2013 22:34:55 GMT
My pen name says:
Two months' ago I was where you are now; a top of the range Toshiba 37" CRT and a built-like-a-tank Pioneer dvd player. In their day, these were expensive bits of kit, 1100 + 700. And I thought the picture was stunning. A couple of days before New Year 2013 the CRT broke down. I replaced it with a 300 Panasonic plasma and then to see what all the fuss was about, an 80 Panasonic bluray player. OMG WOW! Stick with the CRT because they can be excellent when setup correctly, but if and when you do have to replace it, buy a plasma not an LCD.

Posted on 4 Feb 2013 23:23:47 GMT
Trey says:
First of all, all of you are crazy if you think the picture quality on a CRT is better than a LCD. The only format that looks better on CRTs is 480i. I am in the computer industry and deal with high end video on a daily basis. Better resolution = better picture. Ill put my Sony 46" Bravia LED 3D TV up against any TV out there, and I guarantee it will have a better picture, even without bluray. Hook up the PS3 and a HDMI 1.4 cable and be amazed.

In reply to an earlier post on 5 Feb 2013 15:41:37 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:01:59 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 5 Feb 2013 16:11:41 GMT
Totally agree, CRTs were far better than what we've had forced upon us since, in the name of progress. the best tv I had was a 32inch Trinitron picture and sound was awesome from dvds it just took up the entire room! and it took a while to find a tv that matches it for picture whatever the source, beit dvd, vhs,etc. although I did eventually

In reply to an earlier post on 6 Feb 2013 00:27:53 GMT
Bourne1886 says:
That's because you're very slow on the up take when it comes to tech remember! Relax,take it slow and eventually you'll catch up!

Posted on 6 Feb 2013 20:28:53 GMT
Honest joe1 says:
There is a huge difference between SD and Full Hd but not everyone is all that bothered about it, but anyone who says that there is no difference is either blind or most likely at it. enjoy what you enjoy that's my motto. It's also very cheap to get on the HD wagon now compared to the past for 350 you can get half decent 1080p tv and blu ray player when in the past the player was that alone.

In reply to an earlier post on 9 Feb 2013 09:32:50 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:02:15 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 9 Feb 2013 09:33:22 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 16 Feb 2013 10:02:25 GMT]

Posted on 16 Feb 2013 16:55:23 GMT
hd is six times the clarity. nuff said.

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2013 17:32:30 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 21 Feb 2013 22:07:23 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2013 22:05:18 GMT
MadusMaximus says:
It's 6 times the number of pixels. It's also 6 times closer to what the director intended it to look like, bad transfer jobs aside of course.

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2013 22:07:08 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 4 Mar 2013 16:14:10 GMT]

In reply to an earlier post on 26 Feb 2013 05:15:15 GMT
[Deleted by the author on 26 Feb 2013 05:26:05 GMT]
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Participants:  18
Total posts:  49
Initial post:  3 Feb 2013
Latest post:  30 May 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 4 customers

Search Customer Discussions