Customer Discussions > high definition discussion forum

What's the best BLU-RAY transfer so far (picture & sound quality)


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 151-175 of 192 posts in this discussion
Posted on 20 Feb 2011 15:33:18 GMT
Gerry says:
Children Of Men
Apocalypto
Machete
Night At The Museum

Posted on 24 Feb 2011 00:28:04 GMT
Steven V.M. says:
I'm sorry but it's the LOST series. I'm not a big fan of the series but the picture is the nicest I've seen so far and I've seen a LOT of BDs.

If we only count movies, I'd have to say the matrix trilogy. I have high hopes for Once Upon a Time in America, I guess I'll have to wait and see (it's in the mail).

Posted on 24 Feb 2011 02:47:43 GMT
C. Gould says:
I've also seen a lot of BDs and I've seen better, but then it depends on your criteria. The Matrix Trilogy is nowhere near the top tier of the format in technical terms. It's a four year old HD DVD encode with plenty of room for improvement, as is the case with a lot of Warner catalogue titles. Warner, the company that likes to filter most of their older releases, although admittedly not to Universal levels of blurriness. You might be a bit disappointed with OUATIA.

In reply to an earlier post on 24 Feb 2011 05:17:12 GMT
ive heard the first matrix special edition blu ray is cleaned up really well for a old movie plus the camera tricks they used for the movie were some of the first of there kind i will be getting this also if anyone knows when break point the full blu ray (not the inport missing parts of film) comes out in the uk please let me know .

Posted on 24 Feb 2011 11:53:16 GMT
S. A. Ward says:
Baraka.

Posted on 24 Feb 2011 12:07:29 GMT
OK, we expect modern movies to transfer well to Blu-ray, but not necessarily the oldies.

Without a doubt the best example of an 'old' (1982) movie to be transferred to Blu-ray is the classic sci-fi movie Bladerunner.

All previous incarnations that I've seen were dark and lacked contrast & detail; particularly the outdoor scenes and those shot in the rain (plenty of both). To get anything form the movie it had to be watched in an unlit room.

The Blu-ray, on the other hand, has wonderful contrast, vibrant colours and is pin-sharp and spotless throughout.
The audio track is equally excellent. To my memory it's far better than watching the original in the the cinema, by a long way. If you research how the transfer was done, you will understand why. It's a benchmark for Blu-ray transfers.

To conclude, its a 'must have' Bluray, and definitely one to show to all the doubting Thomas' who say that Blu-ray is a waste of money!

Posted on 24 Feb 2011 13:49:24 GMT
Last edited by the author on 24 Feb 2011 13:51:08 GMT
C. Gould says:
The only thing hampering Blade Runner is the low bitrate encode. Typical Warner VC-1 with high teens/low twenties Mbps, whereas it could and probably should have been higher. There are some minor banding issues that might well have been avoided that way. Other than that it is still a very nice transfer considering it was released in 2007.

The Matrix isn't really an 'old' movie though Michael J. Penfold. It was less than ten years old when the HD master was created. The BD looks okay, but there's definite room for improvement across the entire trilogy.

Posted on 24 Feb 2011 19:49:39 GMT
Shazzerman says:
I'm afraid you are wrong Keith Roberts (not the author, are you? Loved "Pavane"): there IS a doubt that "Bladerunner" is the best example of an 'old' movie to be transferred to blu-ray, and I'm expressing it. My pick - but I'll dispense with the "without a doubt" bit - is, hmm, "North by Northwest" (oh, to get my hands on that Criterion "Night of the Hunter" blu-ray...). While "Bladerunner" DOES look great, it is not that significant a leap, as Mr Gould says. A great many titles, some considerably older than Scott's film, WERE given excellent transfers: DAWN OF THE DEAD (this really impressed me in comparison to the dvd), FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE, HOW THE WEST WAS WON (all that care for such a mediocre film, even if it has history), PSYCHO (this actually might be TOO good - I dunno, something rubbed me up the wrong way when I watched it a second time the other night; maybe I wasn't - what is the phrase? - quite myself that day), and, the big daddy, the mOst visually appealing blu-ray of 'em all (and, Mr Gould, I want you to chime in here: the bitrate is fairly low on this title too, if memory serves) THE SEARCHERS. I really can't see how this film could look any better, unless Monument Valley ends up with a high bitrate-blessed glossy finish (nooooo...).

Posted on 24 Feb 2011 23:42:30 GMT
C. Gould says:
Don't own it so can't really comment. The Wizard of Oz deserves some praise though.

Posted on 25 Feb 2011 10:10:23 GMT
Shazzerman says:
Without a doubt - that IS a perfect transfer. I'm not up on all the 4k scanning stuff, but I remember Robert Harris explaining that THE WIZARD was an example of perfection in terms of transfer to blu-ray. For budget reasons, I am beginning to limit my blu-ray purchases to ONLY classic titles at the moment, and only ones that get a good endorsement from someone I trust (total strangers that they are - weird, in a way), like Robert Harris and C. Gould...

Posted on 25 Feb 2011 23:09:53 GMT
C. Gould says:
Oz was actually scanned at 8K if memory serves. There's a really interesting featurette on the BD set that shows the process, along with the manual dirt and scratch removal and restoration of the sepia sequence at the beginning/end (for which they didn't have a print of sufficient quality).

In reply to an earlier post on 26 Feb 2011 02:12:15 GMT
Bob Drake says:
The problem with the old three-strip Warner Technicolor films like Oz, Robin Hood and Wind is that each strip brings it own grain to a resultant frame, resulting in a lot of grain moving around in the final image. Whether it is a 4K scan or an 8K scan the dancing grain particles with me there, and perhaps more noticeably at the higher resolution. Reportedly the 70mm Baraka was scanned at 8K. As far as a film transfer goes there probably isn't a better one. The 65mm ToddAO films (like Oklahoma!) should yield excellent results as well. The direct-to-digital films should be best, one of the reasons I vote for Avatar, Social Network and the upcoming Hobbit being filmed with RED cameras with the 5K Mysterium X chip (like Social Network).

Posted on 26 Feb 2011 22:43:44 GMT
Robin says:
One of the best BRDs is Casablanca. The Pink Panther is also quite exceptionally good. So too is The Professionals.

In reply to an earlier post on 27 Feb 2011 00:18:39 GMT
C. Gould says:
Baraka was scanned at 8K, but it has its share of problems:

http://fractal.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1082785

Posted on 5 Mar 2011 22:47:44 GMT
craig says:
Alien Anthology- reference quality video, 5.1 lossless audio.
Sin City- sexy
I have blade runner and dark city on the way i hear they are good and also Apocalypse Now.

Posted on 6 Mar 2011 21:35:28 GMT
C. Gould says:
Dark City has terrible DNR throughout.

Posted on 7 Mar 2011 00:42:53 GMT
Last edited by the author on 7 Mar 2011 00:55:37 GMT
FullSpectrum says:
Avatar looks good but I would have liked to see what it had looked like without the pro-mist filter. I just hate when digitally shot movies have that added haze to the picture. It does not improve the picture, it destroys it; and I wish it could be banned. I've seen a few low budget flicks shot on digital that didn't have that horrible haze and I definately preferred that. Not as good as real film but still very enjoyable picture quality.

Edit: I saw "The Thing" mentioned but it made me sad to see such a great movie looking soft due to DNR. I think the HD DVD looked better.

Posted on 7 Mar 2011 11:43:55 GMT
C. Gould says:
I have it and it does. There's more fine detail, although the print isn't in the best shape.

Posted on 8 Mar 2011 20:59:48 GMT
JB Jude says:
Can anyone tell why we are still waiting on some James Bond movies to appear on Blu-Ray such as On her Majestys Secret Service and The Spy Who Loved Me? Thanks

Posted on 8 Mar 2011 22:20:03 GMT
Mr. Blu says:
This was presumably to do with MGM's financial problems. Although I believe a deal has now been sorted out.

Posted on 24 Mar 2011 14:52:50 GMT
Gerry says:
Watchmen, Transformers, The Book Of Eli, Tropic Thunder, Casino Royale, Apocalypto Wall-E, Blade Runner, Children Of Men, Hot Fuzz, Apocalypse Now,World Trade Center, Iron Man

Posted on 7 May 2012 01:37:38 BDT
Bourne1886 says:
1-Casino Royale.
2-Zulu.
3-Ben Hur.

Posted on 7 May 2012 08:37:38 BDT
Cartimand says:
Of the old films rejuvenated on blu-ray, by far the best I've seen is 2001 A Space Odyssey. Watched it with my son recently and he simply couldn't believe it dates from 1968. The space scenes, accompanied by that wonderful classical score in sumptuous surround sound, are what home cinema are made for.

Amongst recent films, it's hard to vote against The Fall - absolutely stunning.

Posted on 6 Feb 2013 09:17:46 GMT
Cartimand says:
Now seen one that just might even pip 2001.

How The West Was Won [Blu-ray] [1962][Region Free] looks and sounds unbelievably good for a 1962 movie.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Feb 2013 19:42:48 GMT
And if you think that is good try The Fall and parts of Samsara are breathtaking
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the high definition discussion forum

 

This discussion

Participants:  102
Total posts:  192
Initial post:  12 Dec 2010
Latest post:  20 Feb 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 12 customers

Search Customer Discussions