Customer Discussions > drama discussion forum

worst film you've ever seen ?


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1901-1925 of 1000 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 02:24:10 BDT
Last edited by the author on 29 Jun 2012 02:54:54 BDT
DO NOT please make FALSE STATEMENTS born out of IGNORANCE.

Let me as an Amazon expert and strict follower of GOD and rule of law
CORRECT ALL the LIES and FALSEHOODS recently posted.

1. It has been alleged that harassed forum film expert Ban Loud Rock
has "multiple IDS or accounts".
THIS IS totally FALSE and IMPOSSIBLE.

REASONS ARE :
Under Amazon rules you need to have BOUGHT GOODS with Amazon
having paid using a valid card with same name and address etc etc
ALL THIS BEFORE you are allowed to POST IN AMAZON FORUMS.
To suggest therefore that decent ordinary law abiding forum posters
Amazon customers like myself GODLAW1 or others "may be" Ban L
is complete madness, malicious falsehood and physically impossible.

DO NOT please make these unfounded malicious allegations again.

I believe that 1 into 4 or 4 into 1 *bubbles, gilbert, nio, r hess) have
been caught and exposed for what they are. This Person or persons
should refrain from further unfounded allegations or attacks or worst

Another UTTER NONSENSICAL allegation concerns poster's "grammar"

FACTS ARE what is required is DEEP FILM FACTS/ KNOWLEDGE NOT
utter stupidity fancy commas, ' apostrophes and full stops. Some
posters may be using an ancient keyboard that lacks all these bits.
WHO CARES except for some very old senile "fuddy duddy" wishing
to impress their carers that they can still read, think and stand up.

DO NOT please make FALSE STATEMENTS born out of IGNORANCE.

I believe that 1 into 4 or 4 into 1 *bubbles, gilbert, nio, r hess) have
been caught and exposed for what they are. This Person or persons
should refrain from further unfounded allegations or attacks or worst
to ignore the vast film facts/data Ban Loud has shown over & over.
I myself Godlaw1 may often imitate or copy a persons style but that
DOES NOT make me that person as these 4 false IDS insinuate. GOD

Finally another extremely FALSE ALLEGATION is that one can
"copy from a website" a "list of atrocious worst films".
This malicious nonsensical allegations has been made against Ban L.
THE CORRECT FACTS are that Ban Loud Rock Metal has accumulated
his DEEP VAST FILM KNOWLEDGE through HOURS/DAYS/MONTHS of
research/viewing/reading all about films and actors. Study/hard work.

I CHALLENGE anyone to find any such "imaginary website" that has
even 10 of the WORST VILE FILMS SEEN as posted by expert Ban L.

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 03:05:02 BDT
One of the very WORST MOVIES I saw was

When Harry Met Sally from 89 with Meg Ryan and some Crystal dumb guy.

This junk When Harry Met Sally is so bad, sad , mad, yawn yawn BIN IT.

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 03:27:41 BDT
Last edited by the author on 29 Jun 2012 03:33:14 BDT
Posted on 28 Jun 2012 23:47:33 BDT
Lichinbo says:
Just how many alter egos does one person need or do they suffer from
multiple personality disorder.

Godlaw1 asks Lichinbo : So Lichinbo what did your PSYCHIATRIST say ?

Lichinbo also says :
"I know who i am and what i like and i don't have to lie about it. If
people don't like who i am or what i believe in then tough because i
honestly don't really care what people think or do! "

Godlaw1 asks :
Is this waywardness and carelessness brought about watching stiff
wooden unfunny Jackie Chan movies ?

Lichinbo says also
"the back end of a donkey and the thing you dig in the ground suddenly
are coming into my mind!"
Godlaw1 asks : Have you tried CBT or electric shocks to cure all this ?

Posted on 29 Jun 2012 06:21:02 BDT
[Deleted by Amazon on 29 Jun 2012 11:49:42 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 08:39:27 BDT
Can you tell me which film you are referring to? i FEEL i AM A TAD CONFUSED LOOKING FOR THE TITLE OF YOUR ONE WORST FILM!

Posted on 29 Jun 2012 08:44:14 BDT
Bubbles says:
Seek help, BAN LOUD. Your alter egos appear to have completely taken over.
I wouldn't mind so much, but they are infinitely more boring than your original . . . . . :o)

Well said, Nio, Lichinbo & J.Warner !

Worst film I've ever seen : The Limits of Control. Seems like BAN LOUD has reached HIS limit of control . . .

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 09:13:33 BDT
Bubbles says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 29 Jun 2012 10:44:56 BDT
S. Hopwood says:
J Warner - I fully agree with you. I used to track this thread, being a keen film fan myself, as I found it quite fascinating to hear of other people's worst films, and to see if I agreed with them, which is my personal (and private) prerogative. I posted my worst film, though I felt no need to comment on others films, as everyone has vastly different tastes when it comes to films. What one person may enjoy and love and speaks to them on some level, others might totally hate and vice versa. We cannot all like the same thing or films, or the world would be a very boring place indeed!

When one person tries to dominate a thread like this - it never bodes well and then to try and enforce and bully his views on everyone else that he is the ONLY person whose opinion is worthwhile is so conceited, its breathtaking. Every person is entitled to their own opinion on a film or actor and no-one has the right to say they are wrong.

But I have felt increasingly disappointed in the slanging match that this thread has turned into. When I joined there were 37 people tracking it, now when I leave - it will go down to 30, so people are leaving this thread due to all this arguing and it is very much ruined, which is very sad.

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 12:32:06 BDT
trianon says:
The Human Centipede - just awful!

Posted on 29 Jun 2012 12:42:21 BDT
Shazzerman says:
It's at times like this that I realise who I am...I'm Alan Partridge.

Posted on 29 Jun 2012 14:08:28 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 29 Jun 2012 22:14:34 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 14:32:09 BDT
Shazzerman says:
Yes, I would class "It" as Stephen King's last "really good" novel - everything since has been self-indulgent tripe (although, I would have an interest in his latest offering - the one involving time-travel and the Kennedy assassination). The TV movie that came out was boring and borderline awful, but it may serve as evidence to prove my thesis: that the more you remain faithful to King, the worse the film will turn out. I should maybe further clarify that, and say: the more YOU STRIVE to remain faithful to King, the greater the risk that the film will turn out worthless. The really good things about the great films based on his work - THE SHINING, CARRIE, THE DEAD ZONE (I do not consider SHAWSHANK a great film) - have nothing to do with anything King put in his books.

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 14:32:40 BDT
Catherine says:
I hate the "Sound of Music".

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 15:02:59 BDT
John Brennan says:
Stephen King is a Directors nightmare...as an author i enjoy most of his books - the latest based on the JFK situation, is very descritive and a good story, as usual King, overlong and at times loses the reader. And herein lies the challenge...if you read king you have an exraodinary imagination, which when you see the films, can never live up to. This for me is the sign of a truly great author. It as a book scared me when young and even now brings out goose bums..but the film...!! with the exception of Dead Zone, Cujo, Shawshank, Green Mile hollywood struggles to bring Kings visual to the big screen. The Stand is a claasic example, amazing book.....big screen...!!!!

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 15:12:53 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 29 Jun 2012 22:14:52 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 15:18:36 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 29 Jun 2012 22:15:01 BDT]

Posted on 29 Jun 2012 15:55:15 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 30 Jun 2012 14:21:36 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 16:43:13 BDT
Shazzerman says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 29 Jun 2012 19:24:21 BDT
[Deleted by the author on 30 Jun 2012 14:21:57 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 19:33:06 BDT
Last edited by the author on 29 Jun 2012 19:35:05 BDT
In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 09:13:33 BDT
Bubbles says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post
anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Hide post
again. (Show all unhelpful posts)]
You've got no chance, Ms. J.C.Gilbert I dont think Ban Loud Rock has
even noticed you are female let alone take you for a dirty weekend to
Skegness !! I fool myself hoping WALTER PIDGEON might resuscitate
and go "all the way" with me on the Orient Express but I Bubbles can't
even decide which set of DENTURES and HEARING AID to wear ! Lol.
I am totally incapable of logical thought. I was virile 60 years ago but
now Senile.
I mean, what responsible adult would say something like, Samo Hung is
"slimmer" than Jackie Chan ?
You're dealing with a person of limited intelligence, J.C. :o) but
bear with me as I got Shazzerman fooled at least :) wink wink :)

COMMENT on above ORIGINAL post

WALTER PIDGEON was certainly a swinger and ladies man 50 years ago

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 19:48:55 BDT
The Comic made in 69 with Dicky Van Dyke and Mickey Rooney ranks

as a WORST FILM ever seen by myself. It is banal-dull-unfunny-stiff etc

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 20:56:08 BDT
Shazzerman says:
I guess you are not a fan of slow cinema. Steer well clear of any Tarr or Tarkovsky. Incidentally, I would take ANY of the "Star Wars" films - even the new ones (meesa a glutton for pyoonishment) - over those King adaptations.

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 20:57:08 BDT
Shazzerman says:
To paraphrase Alex DeLarge: "I was fooled alright." Ha!

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 21:02:18 BDT
Shazzerman says:
No it's not. It is a little-seen gem. I found it to be a very moving film. And, again, you seem to be fooling us into thinking you actually - sharp intake of breath - WATCHED THIS ALL THE WAY THROUGH; it is not a comedy (so your "unfunny" comment is more evidence that you are not the absolute apex when it comes to that essential trait - to a film researcher, at least - of having-a-bloody-clue.

In reply to an earlier post on 29 Jun 2012 21:14:51 BDT
Nio says:
Cheers Shaz your contributions are appreciated..love film..even the bad ones...helps when someone tells u how bad...
Ban is just a joke and his new alter ego God whatever.......

BAD FILM....Killers.......Sahara...despite the fact both these films feature main characters that would wipe stevn S off the soul of their shoes...

But im at peace now...goodnight and god bkess...........
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Discussion in:  drama discussion forum
Participants:  1296
Total posts:  2271
Initial post:  24 Mar 2009
Latest post:  26 Aug 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 34 customers

Search Customer Discussions