You don't have to be a genius to notice that a critical review of something is far more likely to get a 'no' vote than a postive one; and, even amongst positive reviews, the most votes often go to the blandest (I'm not bitter or anything...). But that's not what reviews are for, folks - just to say everything is brilliant, 5 stars. Or, as far as Amazon are concerned, is it?
Should they be giving a weighting to total *number* of positive - and maybe even negative - votes, rather than just the proportion?
In fact, do we need the 'no' vote at all? My experience is that it is usually dropped by people who already know the product (and for whom the review is therefore not intended), and rather than thinking it 'unhelpful' merely disagree with, and want to show their disapproval of, it. What useful purpose does the no-vote serve?
Recent discussions in the Amazon Customer Reviews discussion forum (584 discussions)
|What is the star rating for this?||0||19 minutes ago|
|Items supplied at a discount for an unbiased review.||25||1 day ago|
|Wrong review||3||2 days ago|
|Amazon USA reviews shown on UK Products||7||5 days ago|
|Do Amazon hide bad reviews||45||5 days ago|
|callas remastered jewelcase||0||5 days ago|
|Review is not for my book||0||8 days ago|
|Bosch by Stefan Fischer||0||10 days ago|
|What do folk mean by 'trolls' reviewing your book?||35||13 days ago|
|I have a Canon EOS 650D with lens range of 18-55MM , I want to buy this product for close up pics for Jewellery will it be helpful??||0||16 days ago|
|oliver sacks died last year - update your information||0||18 days ago|
|Hi! I'd like to invite you to read my first children's book||0||18 days ago|