Amazon.co.uk: Perdido Street Station is a novel in the great English
tradition of Urban Gothic. How do cities work, and why do you want to
write fantasies set in them?
China Mieville: I am interested in cities because they are where social
conflict is sharpest, where social tension and resistance are strongest.
It is a political choice but also an aesthetic one - cities are places
where different sorts of architecture, different sorts of social mapping,
coincide and conflict. I also wanted to write urban fantasy because of my
debt to other writers--Mervyn Peake, and Mike Harrison and the Mary
Gentle of Rats and Gargoyles--writers who write fantasy with real
politics and economics in them. I don't have a taste for the sort of
historical fantasy which is set in an unreal countryside with a
hierarchical system that is not even real feudalism. Part of this is that
I just don't like the countryside--rural idiocy and sacks of potatoes, as
far as I am concerned. In our real world, the country has become just an
adjunct of the town and is of less interest as a result. Books about
cities are just more exciting--when my surviving characters escape New
Crobuzon at the end, it is to go to another city.
Amazon.co.uk: So you like the complexity of city life?
Mieville: It means that you can assemble disparate alliances of different sort
of people and play off many voices against each other. I wanted to break
down the racial essentialism of a lot of fantasy--I hate the way that in
Tolkien elves have fate instead of free will--and create a lot of species
not all members of whom act in the same way as the others. The vodyanoi,
the riverfolk, have a culture in which people tend to be curmudgeonly, but
I have one vodyanoi who just isn't like that. The city is a place where
reality can be complex.
Amazon.co.uk: Your work is quite, shall we say, unsentimental.
Mieville: It is an overcompensation for my gross sentimentality in real life; I
wanted to be stern with myself about not drifting into the default
sentimentality of a lot of the fantasy I don't like. If the dynamic of the
story means that terrible things happen to nice people, I am not going to
chicken out.
Amazon.co.uk: So part of what you are doing is taking a revisionist approach to
classic fantasy?
Mieville: Cities are places where the arts are made new time and again, partly
because they are such brutal places. Dickens always wants to write
sentimentality, but the dynamic of his realism takes him constantly
towards the brutal; of course there are brutal novels set in the
countryside--Jane Eyre is a good example.
Amazon.co.uk: This is a book which does a lot of movie riffs.
Mieville: When I imagine a scene, I imagine it visually, but above all
cinematically--I often find myself panning through a scene like a camera.
This is how I work--and it means that I am drawn to movie imagery. This
means that sometimes you have to work hard to police the cliches and then
come back and decide that the cliche is what you need and what you can get
away with. I have scripted and cast both my novels in my head--King Rat
is always Robert Carlyle.
Amazon.co.uk: Particularly in the case of Lin, you are very good at seeing non-human
characters from the inside.
Mieville: I think that this is partly because I do see people as moulded by
culture and environment; if I am going to do that massive exercise in
role-play gaming that we call the writing of fiction, I have to be able to
get inside my characters' heads. Difference has to be cultural rather than
ineffable--even when we are talking a woman with a scarab beetle for a
head. I did write one character who really is completely alien--the
Weaver, my giant spider; by comparison, the vodyanoi and the garuda, the
flying people, have areas of empathy. And of course the book does have
some completely alien beings who are probably just smart animals with no
inner life--but how can you tell? The Weaver is incomprehensible, but is
part of the economic realm and has an interest in at least trying to
communicate; it was my riff on giant spiders--Shelob is one of the very
few things I like in Tolkien.
When I write about the life of Lin's people, the khepri, it is not just
local colour; it is a discussion of the allure of metropolitan life. The
city garuda are very different from the desert garuda; they are
marginalised within the city, but they have been co-opted into human
society and culture to a very large extent. The point about Lin is that
she is in several layers of revolt against her culture--she has been
drawn to human bohemia as a revolt against her mother's attempt to create
a fundamentalist khepri identity as opposed to the accommodations that
main-stream khepri have made with human society.
Amazon.co.uk: What have you taken from your influences?
Mieville: We have already name-checked Mike Harrison and Mervyn Peake and the
whole alternative history of fantasy they are examples of; it is not all
epics and quests. I like their sense of the weird, the way that Harrison
remorselessly punishes his characters for being in a fantasy. I love the
grotesquery of Clarke Ashton Smith and William Hope Hodgson--there are
no smooth edges there, just cruelty, decadence and loss. I like Dunsany
and the early Dunsany-influenced dream books of Lovecraft.
I did a lot of role-playing gaming when I was young, and though I don't
any more, I still sometimes buy the source books for their frustrating
blend of the cliched and the creative, and the way they represent an
attempt to systematise inherently unrigorous fantasty worlds into hit-
points and combat statistics, and write out the assumed back history of
fantasy worlds. No matter how much I diss Tolkien for being dull and for
reactionary politics, he did teach us how to use all that stuff as
scaffolding.
Amazon.co.uk: What about Angela Carter?
Mieville: I loved Nights at the Circus and I respect her as a mainstream writer
who did not despise or ignore the strengths of genre fiction. I found
Heroes and Villains
a bit clunky. I think of her as a positive influence
on fantasy in the way I think punk and reggae were positive for popular
music--I just don't like them all that much.
Amazon.co.uk: King Rat
has a lot of music in the plot. I have a sense of music as
quite important to the way you write...
Mieville: King Rat
is a Drum and Bass book--when I thought of it, I was
surprised by how little writing had come out of Drum and Bass, and Jungle --except for this wonderful piece of Black writing Junglist by Two Fingers
and James T. Kirk, which no one very much noticed or reviewed. Obviously I
listened to the music when I was writing King Rat
. People who like the
book say it almost makes them regret not liking the music.
The musical influences on Perdido Street Station
are much less direct--I
mostly listened to the Second Viennese School, Schoenberg, Berg and
Webern, for that Expressionist moment, that sense of a culture taking
itself apart from within.
Amazon.co.uk: You are very influenced by classic surrealism...
Mieville: Both books have surrealist namechecks--Loplop in King Rat
is a direct
reference to the bird creature in Max Ernst and the Weaver's chant when
he rescues our heroes--SAVAGE AND IMPENETRABLE...BLACK AND RUSSET--comes
from Max Ernst's descriptions of the forests he painted. Ernst is one of
my heroes--he did so much in his paintings and his cut-up novels.
Amazon.co.uk: Let's talk about your intellectual background.
Mieville: I did degrees in social anthropology and international relations. I
want to present other ways of being as lived daily experience and that
comes from social anthropology, as does my anti-essentialism--and from
Marxism as well of course. I like having an intellectual hinterland
because it means I can give my writing more texture--there are Gramsci
references tucked into King Rat
for example.
Amazon.co.uk: And your next book?
Mieville: Not a sequel or part of a trilogy, but set in the same world as Perdido
Street Station
, mostly on a ship at sea. There are characters in common,
but not the major ones.
Amazon.co.uk: What are you reading? Listening to? Watching?
Mieville: I always read a lot of fiction and non-fiction at the same time--I'm
reading a Polish fantasist, Grabinsky whose Dark Dominion
is published by
Daedalus--I found him in the Daedalus Book of Polish Fantasy. I am also
reading Vampires of Alfama
by Pierre Kast, a vampire novel from the 70s by
a Nouvelle Vague film critic who would probably be horrified to be thought
of as genre horror. As for non-fiction, The People's History of the World
by Chris Harman and Book Three of Marx's Capital.
My current musical obsessions are Bran Van's 3000 Glee
and Ganja
Crew's Fuck the Millennium
.
I haven't been to see anything since Fight Club
, because
anything after that work of genius might be a disappointment.