Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
35 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
First impressions on the first day of ownership., 27 Aug 2008
After much research and reading of reviews, I bought this to replace a 5-year old Nikon Coolpix 5700 that had finally given up the ghost after being round the world and taking 10000 pictures. I was pleased with the results from the old Nikon, but the Olympus is, on first impression, far superior.
You are probably going to buy this Olympus because of the massive size of the zoom. It has double the resolution and 2.5 times the optical zoom of my old Nikon. The Olympus has a massive 20x zoom, and for a camera that is 5 years more advanced you would expect some huge improvements in performance. The zoom operates by a ring on the lens, like an SLR, which drives the motor. One reviewer I read suggested that this seems slow, but I am happy with it. It seems far more responsive and faster to zoom than the button operated Coolpix. (The ring turns the opposite way from the zoom on my old Olympus 35mm SLR, but that is just a case of getting familiar with it.)
The recording of pictures to the card is so much faster at high resolution. I could manage 2 photos a minute at maximum resolution on the old Nikon, this takes picture after picture and doesn't slow down. True multiple-image shots are only available in a lower 3MP resolution.
So far I have mostly used the camera in full auto mode where full frame portraits are spot on crystal clear. The flash works well indoors, much better than the one on my old Nikon. Landscapes are clearer when switched to landscape mode. In auto mode in lowish late-summer evening light it was taking pictures with a wide aperture so there was poor depth of field and it focuses mid field so the horizon and near ground was out of focus. This was much improved by switching to the dedicated landscape mode.
I snapped some shots of kittiwakes on the beach that were about 30-40 metres away. Even at 10 mega-pixels with a largish bird at that distance, the resolution was not good enough to enlarge the image to view just the bird on my laptop screen. However, at that distance the individual birds were a perfectly clear element in the picture of the flock. To get a good-close up image of a bird of that size you need to be closer, 10-15 metres. That is usually possible with time and patience. I'm intrigued to see what one of the tele-converters would do. Would this have been improved by a bigger CCD? Possibly.
The image stabilisation seems to work well. The wind was very blustery and I still managed some clear shots at full optical and digital zoom.
The response of the shutter seemed immediate compared with older digital cameras. I was able to photograph birds taking off.
I easily worked my way through the menus without reference to the manual. Many of the buttons and menus work similarly to the Nikon and felt familiar. The controls are easy to operate, even for someone with huge hands like me. (It also fits the Coolpix 5700's soft case perfectly.) The Olympus is comfortable to hold and easy to operate.
Movies are AVI files, that work on Windows Media Player... the Nikon would only take QuickTime movies.
The auto-focus is really quiet. The Nikon used to make a continuous clicking noise which could be heard on the movie recordings. The start-up and shutter sounds can be turned off and have been - I found them quite annoying.
It works on AA batteries and you can use either Alkaline or Ni-Cads. Fantastic! The manual says not to use various other types of rechargeable,
The screen on the back is big and clear, although I prefer to look through a view finder. The only problem is that, even when doing so, it reviews the image on the main screen and not on the viewfinder. I haven't yet seen if there is a way around it. The screen does seem a little vulnerable, although this isn't unique to just the Olympus. The old Nikon Coolpix 5700 screen (although much smaller) used to fold away, and allowed you to turn the screen by 90s - a great feature unavailable on the Olympus.
There are accessories available on the market for this camera including tele-converters, filters and it will take a generic hot-shoe flash - you are not stuck with buying the Olympus model. (The Nikon would only take a Nikon flash.) I think there are underwater cases for it too.
For under £230 including a 2 Gig memory XD card this camera is fantastic value. For a non-professional but keen photographer like me, it is just the job. If I were to buy a digital SLR with a similar range of lenses, it would set me back well over £1000. You have to shop about for offers - don't pay the prices that some retailers are selling it at. If one online dealer can offer the deal I got, so can others. I have seen it listed as much as £380, for example Olympus SP-570UZ Digital Camera XD Media 2.7in LCD 20x Optical 5x Digital Zoom 10.1 Mpxl Ref N3118092- £140 more than I paid and I got a free 2GB memory card with it. On Amazon I just missed a 'refurbished' one (customer return) for £199.
The software package was disappointing - I would have expected at least Photoshop Elements to come free with it. I have not tried the Olympus image downloading software as I use a card reader
This camera looks and feels like an SLR and takes some really good pictures. It won't fit in your pocket like a compact and it doesn't have as big a CCD or as high performing buffer as a true digital SLR. However, the performance far outweighs any pocket digital and it is far, far cheaper than an SLR with the equivalent lens kit.
I'll write another review when I have had it longer than a day! This is the best offer on Amazon at the moment, but it should be cheaper :Olympus SP-570UZ Compact Digital Camera - Black ( 10.1 Million, 20x Zoom) 2.7" LCD
|
|
|
65 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Worlds First Review !!, 16 April 2008
One of the main reasons i purchased this camera was the massive zoom and the fact you can manually zoom with the barrel ring.
With a zoom this large i think they take too slow to zoom in out out with the normal motorised method and thought the manual zoom would be the perfect solution and in keeping with my Olympus E410 DSLR when zooming manually.
How wrong was I !! the zoom seems to be motorised anyway you just control it manually instead, it,s very unresponsive and too responsive all in one !! hard too explain exactly ,Def not what i was expecting.
The handling is very awkward because of this and one handed use is out of the question.
Build quality and looks are superb and really feels and looks like a SLR,
nice size and weight as well.
Pic quality at base iso is fantastic and comparable to my E410 DSLR at 100 iso and 200 iso, at 400 iso the Dslr,s larger senser starts to take advantage and at 800 and beyond there is no compare at all, although colour and saturation is still good up to 800 iso and prob usefull for emergency use rather then missing the shot.
Interface is average and a bit long winded to be honest but features are excellent if you like playing around.
LCD is fantastic and viewfinder is pretty good as well with good light and resolution.
Autofocus is slow and the buffer writting seems slow after a shot,although the burst mode at lower res is very very good and the lcd does,nt black out so you can still compose while following the subject(very usefull)
Exposure and white balance seems very accurate and shots tend to come out very well exposed and natural.
Video mode is excellent and Macro is very very good.
I,m sure i could get better results and give better info about this camera in time but to be honest the Zoom has left me cold and is enough for me to rethink.
It,s a real shame no one makes a super zoom like the Canon S3 Or S5 2 step control which is instant,accurate and super super fast.
I think this camera would prob excel at wild life shots and General interest such as portrait,Buildings and landscape where the superb wide angle to tele range would come in to it,s own.
If your happy to take your time composing your shots and are in no particular rush then this could be for you but i would strongly recommend trying the zoom in a shop if you can.
If you like taking a bit of action and fast moving kids like myself ,this is def not the camera for you,and this is def not a DSLR replacement either.
|
|
|
16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
j.g.fairbrother.niton,isle of wight., 19 May 2008
upgraded my camera from the fuji s5500 and was so glad i did,what an excellent camera,fantastic features,easy to use,and a great zoom to capture the wonderful wildlife,macro mode is excellent to.highly recommended to anyone wishing to buy a compact digital camera with the feel and looks of a DSLR.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
