|
|
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Abstractions, reflections, and moments in time., 9 Aug 2005
2046 is perhaps Wong Kar-Wai's ultimate statement as a filmmaker... an epic, multi-layered masterpiece that acts as a sort of culmination of various themes, ideas, characters and motifs developed as far back as 1991 with his second feature, Days Of Being Wild. It also acts as a direct sequel to his last film, the sombre and restrained period piece, In The Mood For Love, with its continuation of the character, Mr. Chow, and his metamorphosis from polite, married journalist, to swinging playboy and creator of a series of steamy novellas set within the fictional world of 2046... a self-reflexive commentary on the themes and ideas established in the previous film, as well as a revaluation of the characters and scenarios that will appear in this film as well.Like a lot of his work, the film is a rumination on time and memory, and a comment on how those factors can both soothe and enrage the ghosts of past heartache. It's also a comment on the writing process in general, with the character of Mr. Chow writing the story of 2046 - and it's follow up, 2047 - whilst simultaneously commenting on his own character, the women around him and the film it's self. There's certainly an air of Fellini about the project in this respect, with the film really coming down to a series of episodic love-affairs that only end up relating back to that ephemeral relationship between Chow and Su Li-zhen in the earlier film, with the allusions to La Dolce Vita, Casanova and The City of Women all bubbling away under the various other references and possible interpretations woven so meticulously into the story and the images. Like In The Mood For Love, the film employs a fractured visual style to compliment the fragmented plot, with Wong and his three cinematographers shooting the action through doorways, windows, the cross-roads of corridors, breaking the composition up to obscure characters behind art-deco and pieces of furniture, whilst also using the stroboscopic technique familiar from all of Wong's previous films (in particular, ChungKing Express) to add a further, dislocated, dreamlike quality to the images. The use of colour, particularly in the scenes set within the story of 2046 and 2047 are absolutely ravishing, with Wong and, in particular, Chris Doyle (who shot the majority of the film) drowning the visual palette with amber yellows, deep purples, and violent reds. It's without question one of the most beautiful films I've ever seen, on a par with Cocteau's Beauty and The Beast, Kubrick's Barry Lyndon, von Trier's Europa, and Zhang Yimou's Hero... which was also shot by Doyle. As noted before, there are quite a few layers woven into the film, like much of Wong's work the film is always evolving in a manner that is at times hard to fully comprehend, with the film really requiring a few viewings for the story to fully emerge. Although it seems like a continuation of Wong's style, particularly the style of his previous film, it also seems like something of a radical departure... a work of astounding intricacy and personal reflection akin to Tarkovsky's similarly personal and fragmented masterpiece Mirror. This, for me, is an apt comparison, with Wong using a lot of mirrored symbolism, not only in the way that he uses mirrors and reflective surfaces to capture the reactions of his characters, but also in the way that the women who move through the life of Mr. Chow seem to offer a reflection, or distant echo, of the character originally portrayed by Maggie Cheung. This kind of deep interpretation might come across as guesswork or intellectual masturbation on my part, but for me, 2046 is an endlessly fascinating film open to a myriad of personal interpretations. Like the other commentators mentioned, the film works best if you bring your own pain and experiences to it, allowing the story of Chow and the relationship at the heart of In The Mood For Love to once again mirror our own thoughts and feelings. It is obvious throughout the film that Chow is a deeply wounded character hiding behind a façade of cool arrogance and heartless sex, though there is still that shard of naive romanticism so prevalent in Mood... lurking deep beneath the surface. This is most apparent towards the end of the film, in which we see Chow decamp to the gambling dens of Shanghai, where he meets a mysterious woman with a gloved hand, who is also mysteriously named Su Li-zhen. Is this a real character or another creation of Mr. Chow, no different than the ciphers and abstractions found in his book, the scenes from which make up a great deal of the film's final act. The depiction of the world of 2046 and 2047 is one of the most startling cinematic creations ever witnessed, far-surpassing Kubrick's vision in 2001... the use of music, editing and cinematographic composition is astounding, whilst the whole final act of the films just brims with a melancholic beauty that is a heartbreaking and transcendent as those final scenes set within the ruined city, from In The Mood For Love. As with that film, 2046 begins and ends with a reprise of Chow's story about the man who whispered his deepest secrets into a hole carved within a rock, which adds a further element of self-reflection to the notion of writing and storytelling here. Certainly a film of this nature won't appeal to all tastes, with a lot of viewers complaining about the continual fragmentation of the plot and the slow pace, which offers moments of thought and reflection (rare in today's fast-food cinema)... however, I feel that those really captivated by the ephemeral and ethereal depiction of love and undying devotion seen in the previous film of this cycle, or those with a fondness for the cinema of Tarkovsky, Fellini and indeed, Wong himself, will find this film suitably enthralling. For me, it's a fascinating work, one that is open to interpretation and rewards our patients and it's need for repeated viewings with a beautiful atmosphere, an enriching story, and some of the most beautiful images ever seen.
|