|
94 of 97 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Stability Counts, 14 Jul 2004
I've had this camera for a few days, and I've explored most of the settings and modes.The review at dcresource.com is quite accurate, but one or two things need emphasising. I upgraded to this camera from the Canon A20 (a three year old point and shoot 2.1 megapixel job), and the S1 has the same size of screen. Whilst it's just about bright enough to see in strong daylight, it's not really big enough to make taking shots comfortable. The lack of an optical viewfinder means that tracking any moving object (whether it be a Formula 1 car or a toddling one year old) is a hit and miss affair, even with the continuous autofocus switched on. There is a significant lag between pressing the button and the shot being taken. I haven't experimented with the continuous shot mode (where you can fire off several shots one after the other), but I imagine the problem would be just as bad there, since the screen locks up for the whole sequence. Of course, you can always go into manual mode, use a large depth of field and switch the autofocus off, in which case the lag becomes insignificant. But for most situations fiddling with manual focus to track a nearby moving subject (like the aforementioned toddler) isn't really an option. You have to hold down the MF button, whilst operating the four-way selector. It's fine for setting up a static shot, but useless for action. This problem is not confined to this camera. I think all of the competition at this level (Olympus C-765, Konica Minolta Dimage Z2 and Kodak DX6490) suffer from the same limitation. None of the cameras I just mentioned have an image stabiliser though, and it's this that sets the S1 apart. It gives you effectively another f stop in low light. I've always been able to take pictures at 1/30th shutter speed, but with the image stabiliser I can get good shots at 1/15th. With the 10x zoom, the image stabiliser means you don't need to carry a tripod, unless the light is very dim. Picture quality is also very good, with three metering modes for maximum flexibility. Highlights still tend to blow out a little, but I believe this may be a common feature on Canon cameras (if not, all digital cameras). There is a little chromatic aberration (purple fringing etc) at the extreme telephoto end of the lens, but it's only noticeable on high contrast elements (like the edge of a black building against a white sky). All of the competition suffer from this problem, it being a limitation of the very long but physically small lens. The movie mode is very good, with clear pictures and solid movement. I have been able to shoot at the highest setting using a Lexar x12 128mb CompactFlash card, and the supplied 32mb Canon card works fine. But none of my other cards worked very well for movies. So, I'd recommend getting at least a 12x card. Movie files are output from the camera in avi format, but although Media Player and the supplied QuickTime Player will read them, some editing packages will not. I've had to use the Stoik converter to create files that my editor of choice (Magix Movie Edit Pro) can see. Despite these wee problems, I am delighted with this camera. Before I got the A20 I used SLR's for years, so it's great to be able to muck around with depth of field and exposure modes. Picture quality is pin sharp, and the big lens makes a huge difference. Pros - Picture quality Image stabiliser Big lens Microdrive compatible (but I haven't tested this) Great movie mode Easy to use Cons - Tiny LCD No optical viewfinder Operating lag
|