|
|
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Mediocre New Release From Metal Legends, 29 Oct 2003
St. Anger, Metallica's Newest album. The hype that surrounded this was phenomenal, so did Metallica live up to it?Well, no, not really. Firstly, i'll address the absence of guitar solos in the songs. These songs weren't written to have solos, having them would spoil the tracks. Granted, if there would have been a few tracks with solos, the overall quality of the album would have been increased. Secondly, if you'll listen to the album, the glaring noise of Lars hammering on his kit overpowers every other instrument. Let me get this straight, the drum production on this album is horrible. Listening to the title track, during the chorus you can barely hear the guitars. It's that bad. But, i didn't give this three stars because of the absence of guitars, or the horrible drum production. Overall, the songs are not really that bad. Sure, they don't have the classical lyrics of the older Metallica material, 'Invisible Kid' being a good example, but the songs are well-written. St. Anger is not a terrible album. It's very listenable, it's just that the songs are so long. Not 'Master of Puppets' long either, they just drag on and on and on. Take 'Frantic', for example. Listening to the song, you'd think that Metallica wrote the whole song, played it, then played it again, and called that the track. You'd swear that 'Frantic' is the same song played twice, there's no difference or variety throughout. The same goes for many of the tracks on the album. It just gets very boring. If half of the songs on this album were cut down in length, it would have deserved a four star rating, regardless of the absent solos or terrible drum production. In my opinion, you shouldn't waste your time on this record, unless you are a very, very hardcore fan of Metallica, or usually listen to your songs twice through. Buy 'Ride The Lightning' instead, and get a proper classic.
|