12 used & new from £0.46

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Hamlet [VHS] [2000]
 
See larger image
 

Hamlet [VHS] [2000]

VHS ~ Ethan Hawke
3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (16 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


3 new from £12.75 9 used from £0.46
Christmas Offers--Up to 70% Off DVD and Blu-ray
Low-priced gift ideas, TV box sets, Blu-ray documentaries and recent drama, action and sci-fi hits. Go easy on your wallet this Christmas. Shop now

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Hamlet [DVD] [1948]

Hamlet [DVD] [1948]

DVD ~ Laurence Olivier
Hamlet [DVD] [1990]

Hamlet [DVD] [1990]

DVD ~ Mel Gibson
3.0 out of 5 stars (2)  £5.98
Hamlet (2 Disc Special Edition)

Hamlet (2 Disc Special Edition)

DVD ~ Kenneth Branagh
4.1 out of 5 stars (16)  £4.98
Megalomaniac (Salt Modern Poets)

Megalomaniac (Salt Modern Poets)

by Shamshad Khan
£7.04
Hamlet [DVD] [1990]

Hamlet [DVD] [1990]

DVD ~ MacIntyre Dixon
5.0 out of 5 stars (2)  £15.98
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Actors: Ethan Hawke, Kyle MacLachlan, Sam Shepard, Bill Murray, Diane Venora
  • Directors: Michael Almereyda
  • Format: PAL
  • Language English
  • Classification: 12
  • Studio: Cinema Club
  • VHS Release Date: 3 Feb 2003
  • Run Time: 106 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (16 customer reviews)
  • ASIN: B00005A7UE
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 12,303 in Video (See Bestsellers in Video)

Product Description

Amazon.co.uk Review

As an entry in the Shakespeare-redone-as-teen-movie stakes, Hamlet has a less obvious hook than most. Though the gloomy prince--played by Ethan Hawke as a 20-something clinging to student status because he can't cope with the grown-up world of power politics--is a youth identification figure, the political background, translated into a big business concern with Old Hamlet as the CEO of the Denmark Corporation, is beyond the gangland simplicities of Romeo and Juliet or the high school pecking order of 10 Things I Hate About You. Michael Almereyda, after two interesting horror movies (Nadja and The Eternal), offers what he calls "a rough draft" of the play, and casts very fine players in a severely abbreviated text: the micro-presence of some (Jeffrey Wright as the grave-digger) suggests a longer version was prepared and slimmed down to this quite tight picture. The actors manage a middle ground between the original and the new context: Sam Shepard's Ghost lingers silently beyond his stage appearances to emphasise the textual theme that Old Hamlet was a sinning villain who deserves his limbo; Kyle MacLachlan's Claudius is smooth, but conscience-struck in the back of his limo after viewing Hamlet's cut-up underground film allegorising the murder; Diane Venora's Gertrude is a radical reading that plays well, drinking the poison on purpose to save her son and at once innocent of her husband's murder but genuinely committed to Claudius's rule; Bill Murray, Liev Schrieber and Julia Stiles make a good unit as Polonius, Laertes and Ophelia respectively, though the text-pruning (and especially Stiles's vulnerable mad child) turns them into victims of a selfish Hamlet rather than culpable collaborators with the something rotten in Denmark. Hawke's prince is the sketchiest reading but his knitted hat and messy student workstation make sense and he is a credible post-adolescent ditherer. This Hamlet, who has to be convinced of his uncle's guilt and that he ought to take revenge, never quite comes round to the brutal eye-for-an-eye logic of his father. The settings are steely hotel ballrooms (the coronation is translated to a press conference) and other inventively co-opted New York locales: Ophelia drowns in a huge lobby fountain, her mad scene is at a reception in the Guggenheim, the "to be or not to be" speech is delivered in the aisles of Blockbuster Video (as Hamlet prowls the Action section). Deliberately imperfect but far more interesting (and exciting) than the recent Mel Gibson and Kenneth Branagh embalmings of the play, this is a rare and welcome Hamlet that sets out to be an addition to the debate rather than a definitive reading. --Kim Newman


Synopsis

A new adaptation of William Shakespeare's Hamlet set in modern day New York which tells the story of Hamlet, a young filmmaker. His uncle Claudius takes control of the family business when he marries Hamlet's widowed mother. Hamlet learns that his father was murdered by Claudius and soon he has revenge on his mind...

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

16 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (6)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.4 out of 5 stars (16 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
17 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars mumbo jumbo, 21 Jan 2003
By Alejandra Vernon "artist & illustrator" (Long Beach, California) - See all my reviews
(TOP 50 REVIEWER)   
If this had been my first exposure to Hamlet, I'm sure I would not have had a clue as to what the play was about after seeing this updated version.
There are some very talented actors in this film, but for many of them, this is not their shining moment, and some seem acutely ill at ease with the Bard's liquid phrases.
Liev Schreiber as Laertes is one of the exceptions. He rises like cream to the top, and seems very comfortable in the part. Also good is Diane Venora, looking gorgeous as Gertrude, and Sam Shepard is a wonderful Ghost.

Whoever decided that Hamlet should have a "grungy" look, carried it to an unpleasant extreme...and that woolen cap with the earflaps ! I realize this was done to make him look "unhinged", but it bothered me. This film loses a star, just for that hideous woolen cap.
Otherwise, the art direction is good, and the cinematography (John de Borman) is excellent, highlighting some great architecture (it also highlights a lot of "in your face" product placement). Listen for Eartha Kitt's "buckle up" message, it's a welcome chuckle.

This film is an interesting curiosity piece, but I recommend seeing the Zeffirelli/Gibson version afterwards, which is a film that gets better with each viewing, and would be in my "Top 10" list of all time favorites.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
12 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars To be or not to be?, 10 April 2005
By Christos Stathis "pantelis43" (Athens, Greece) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)      
This review is from: Hamlet [DVD] [2000] (DVD)
If you like Hamlet as a play, this is one movie that you sholud certainly watch. If you have watched any of the other versions (Mel Gibson's or Kenneth Branagh's for instance), you will immediately spot the huge differences that it has with the other movies. Although the dialogues are exactly the same, the setting is extremely different, as the movie is settled in New York City of 2000. New things are being introduced in a Shakesperean play, such as an aeroplane, a laptop and a limouzine... This is what makes it realy interesting, mainly because young audiences can easily relate to it, and find out that Hamlet actually haves a very imporatant message to send to nowday's youth, as well as it's extreme significance today. All in all, Hamlet 2000 is a movie worth watching, because it gives the viewers an excellent chance to relate everything what happens in the play to our modern society. Watch it and you will not loose.!
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Gimmicky in the extreme, 24 Mar 2002
By Mr. L. O. G. Owen (Norwich) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Well, for many months after having seen Kenneth Branagh's four-hour "Hamlet" I felt the need to see a modern, funky Hamlet, with Claudius portrayed as a ruthless businessman and so forth, and I couldn't wait to see this version. I was, however, sadly disappointed.

The interpretation is not at fault, however. "Hamlet" can indeed be transposed very well into a modern-day setting, one only has to watch the Royal Shakespeare Company's superb current production of the play starring Sam West to realise that- the play does work as a business-world drama. But this movie was so filled with unnecessary gimmickry and horrendous abridgement (I often found myself saying "Where did the rest of that line go?!" and no scene lasted longer than two minutes) that the play was smothered underneath it.

So now to the individual cast.

Ethan Hawke as the troubled Dane (or rather, the troubled New Yorker) is entirely one-sided. Often we see Hamlets who are witty, charming, emotional, brooding and twisted. Hawke's Hamlet is brooding. Throughout. And nothing else.

Kyle MacLachlan is slightly better as Claudius, though someone with a more powerful screen presence might have been a bit more suited to the role.

Bill Murray as Polonius isn't too bad, although most of his lines are heavily cut and hence he doesn't get much of a chance to shine. He certainly brings out the "tedious old fool" aspect of the character.

Liev Schreiber, Diane Venora and Sam Shepard as Laertes, Gertrude and the Ghost respectively are all fairly good, and would be very good indeed given the same parts in a better version of the play.

Julia Stiles as Ophelia is uninteresting and frankly unmoving.

On the whole, the majority of these characters are portrayed by Shakespeare as complex three-dimensional characters. Michael Almereyda choses, however, to cut or downplay the third dimension to each (the happy side of Hamlet, the remorseful side of Claudius, the angry side of Polonius) and thus it ends up a play full of caricatures.

It seems to me as if this film is the version designed for people who want to be able to say that they've seen "Hamlet", when actually all they've seen is a gimmicky version in which over half the text is cut.

Oh, and, apart from a novel take on Gertrude's death, the ending is appalling.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars i liked it, sorry
This is a review of the filmed version of Hamlet, not a comparison with any production of the play which I leave to others. Read more
Published 10 months ago by N. Carley

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent
Fresh, vibrant contemporary adaptation and perfectly transposed to the millenium of New York City.
Superb cast and sublime acting.
Published 21 months ago by LoveReading

3.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant concept - Poorly executed
When I first became aware of this version of Hamlet, I was intensely intrigued. What a brilliant idea to bring it to modern-day Manhattan, with the CEO of the Denmark Corporation... Read more
Published 23 months ago by Nicholas Casley

4.0 out of 5 stars Much better than might be expected
Some reviewers have complained about the acting and the casting for this modern dress Hamlet. Clearly Bill Murray as Polonius is something of a joke. Read more
Published on 20 Mar 2007 by Dennis Littrell

4.0 out of 5 stars From a student (sorry)
I have to say, I think other reviewers are being unfair about the abridgement - yes, large amounts of the play are cut, but the essence is definitely still entact. Read more
Published on 17 Jan 2007 by Probiotic Yoghurt

5.0 out of 5 stars Come on...it's not that bad
Studying Hamlet for my English Lterature A Level, I was interested to see what this had to offer, having struggled through the first quarter of an hour of Branagh's excessively... Read more
Published on 20 Sep 2006 by phiz

4.0 out of 5 stars Very enjoyable
I think that this film has been unduely slated by other reveiwers. Some people will never be happy unless the film is four hours long without a word cut. Read more
Published on 7 April 2006

2.0 out of 5 stars Where is the wit? Where is the vigour? Where is the colour?
Where is the play?

I groaned when I first heard of this 'slacker' Hamlet, because it seemed such an over-obvious idea. Read more

Published on 24 Mar 2006 by oldbillie

1.0 out of 5 stars To be innovative or to be very trite? (Not worth it)
Well here we are folks. A production that does not know what it wants "to be". Usually I like to compare to other versions or the written play. Read more
Published on 5 Feb 2006 by bernie

1.0 out of 5 stars To be innovative or to be very trite? (Not worth it)
Well here we are folks. A production that does not know what it wants "to be". Usually I like to compare to other versions or the written play. Read more
Published on 11 Dec 2004 by bernie

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Discussion Replies Latest Post
Favourite last scene. 75 53 minutes ago
most memorable film openings 39 2 hours ago
gay films 58 2 hours ago
Iain Cuthbertson RIP 24 5 hours ago
Language & Subtitle Info 6 6 hours ago
Films that made you cry?? 214 16 hours ago
worst film you've ever seen ? 706 1 day ago
   
Related forums
  • drama  (152 discussions)


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject






i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.