Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
Read the book, OR watch the film...., 18 Nov 2006
... just don't do both, or you may find yourself very dissapointed, as myself and many other reviewers have found. The Beach is a hard film to review. Afterall, do you realate it to the best-selling novel? Or do you talk about it in Hollywood terms? I tried to look at it from both angles...
Thankfully, I read the reviews here on Amazon, so I already had the idea that this would have elements of Hollywood in it. What I didn't realise was the scale of it. Upon starting the film, everything seems in place I guess - Richard out on the town, and then staying the hotel. However, 1 hour 55 minutes just isn't enough time, and it shows as the character development is rushed. And before you know it, the three travellers - Richard, Etienne, and Francoise are in agreement to go to the beach, yet they haven't even exchanged conservations previously... (apart from Francoise helping Richard open his door, and exchange names). The choice of Richard - that being Leo' DiCaprio also shows to have an affect on the book, as the meeting with Zeph and Sammy doesn't have the same effect, as they don't see him as they stereotypical english person.
The travel to the island is also brings out the Hollywood side, as Leo =D= (its easier to type!) shows his shouting and swearing side that is completely unesscary, as the character Richard wasn't really an eccentric perosn as the film makes him out to be. And i'm afraid to say that much of the 'Beach Life' is varied to that of the book. The romance in the book that saw Francoise and Richard have feelings for each other, yet kept them hidden, is re-written. Instead, the producers felt they had to literally 'fall' for each other - the result being them snogging in the sea, and then having sex after.. completely un-nessecary, and not part of Richards true character. And neither is his dialogue, as he goes for the usual cheesy lines "oh man I love her so much, I wish I could talk french" blah blah blah.
The merging of Jed and Sal as one character was risky, and doesn't do justice. I felt the choice of actor was wrong, and the merging of the characters meant she (the final character is Sal.. but with Jeds actions..hmm) has to go on the rice run with Richard. What happens afetr? They end up having more sex. This then turns out to be one of the hot-points of th break up with characters, unlike the book were it was a combination of things. Missing out things like the food poisoning was a blow too, as that was a big event in the camp.
The film ends with the camp breaking up through the guards discovery of the huts. But I won't spoil this 'dramatic' finale to the film. But to be fair, the final scene back in homeland was very well done.
SO, how about the other angle? You've never read the book, and therefore know nothing about the story? Chances are, you'll really love the film. The soundtrack is fantastic on the beach, with the likes of Moby-Porcelain, and All Saints' Pure Shores, which both make the hairs stand on end - just made for island. And on that note, the island is quite breathtaking - white sand, clear waters, lovely jungles - you name it. The development of Richards 'video game' attitute to life is also noted fairly well too. As in the book, he has an adventerous attitude that makes him want to explore, to try things. And one of the things behind his interest in the dope field guards (though not really mentioned in the film for some reason...) is Daffy, who treats it like Vietnam. The 'video game' scene is really well done, and i'm suprised it was included. But its a novelty, as not many films would try it. But as Richard see's death and blood in the real, he discovers its not like anything he imagined, and is captured well as he runs away.
Well, thats the basis of the film from the 2 angles. Anyone who's read the novel will know just how absorbing and imaginative it is. Therefore, all I can say is read the book, and you will see what really is 'THE BEACH'.
|
|
|
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
Don't think book to film,just watch it as a film..it is good, 6 Feb 2006
This is without doubt a great film and one of leonardo di caprio's best performances.I really do like this film and i don't think it got the acknowledgement it deserved.The acting is great
and the scenery is both spectacular and beautiful.I put myself into the position of Richard when i watch this,thinking you
know if i went travelling and went to the places he does and the situations he gets himself into what would i do. The story is of an American traveller,Richard (Di Caprio) and his chance meeting with Daffy (a cameo by Robert Carlyle)
in a hotel.Daffy gives him a map of a secret island where paradise can be found and Richard soon tells the story to two
French travellers and they all head of in search of the island,but when they get there the paradise soon turns into a
nightmare and for Richard his mind starts to lose control. As i said this to me is a more than a cult classic where only a few people loved it.It should be liked by more and for some
reason people don't seem to like to say that they liked this film and they look at you as if you are sad for liking it yourself.
As i said try it for yourself and see.
|
|
|
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
Great story, great acting, cool extra DVD features, 17 Feb 2001
By A Customer
I've just read the book by Alex Garland, which I loved, and just rented this DVD to check out the adaptation of the story by the authors of Trainspotting, a movie which I hadn't really fallen for. I was curious to see if the equation 'love the book - hate the movie' would work for this one too, but I have to say it wasn't the case. Yes, the movie does stray from the original story in some points, but it's clear that it's mostly for practical purposes - several characters are condensed into one, dramatic developments occur more abruptly, characterization is less profound. That's obvious with movies from books, and in this case you got to condense a story that's over 400 page long, written in first person narrative, and with some pretty striking touches that are obviously lost in the film version. But in exchange for these unavoidable losses you also get a lot more than on paper - the striking visuals which pay a more than fair tribute to the writer's wonderful skill with descriptions (director of photography Darius Kondji is a master of his art), the great casting and acting, a cool soundtrack, and more catchy twists in the plot. True, some of the variations from the book are clearly imposed by Hollywood standards - the extra sex and love interest, mostly, and the simplified ending. But they do work somehow here. The extra features allow you to view the alte | |
(284)
![Romeo And Juliet [1996]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51FC5P2VXEL._SL500_SS90_.jpg)
![Cast Away (2 Disc Set) [2001]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/517VT99R2QL._SL500_SS90_.jpg)
(30)
£5.48
![Blood Diamond [2006]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51qSvyJuNgL._SL500_SS90_.jpg)
![Catch Me If You Can [2003]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ANZC2NV1L._SL500_SS90_.jpg)
See all Reviews
(46 customer reviews)
(
