Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A great remake, with no strings attached, 20 Jan 2003
This effects-loaded remake of the classic 1959 Vincent Price classic The House on Haunted Hill actually succeeds admirably. While the plot diverges significantly from the original movie's premise, this movie reflects and in some ways honors its forbear. The story's quite simple. Millionaire Stephen Price (a scary amusement park creator) invites 5 guests to a haunted house to celebrate his wife's birthday, promising any one who survives the night one million dollars. He and his wife not-so-secretly want to murder each other, and the invited guests are to play an integral part in their devious plans. The owner of the house quite unintentionally finds himself trapped in the house with the others, and he reveals grisly secrets of the house's past in between drinking like a fish and stating that they are all going to die. Much to the chagrin of the Prices, the haunted house lives up to its name and quite upsets their plans for the evening. Stephen Price is surprised to find that the guests who show up are not the ones he invited, and it eventually becomes clear that the house set the guest list for its own nefarious purposes. The original movie has achieved cult status with its simple yet scary effects, its twisting storyline, and the brilliance of Vincent Price in his role. This movie ratchets up the horror to heights unimaginable in 1959; while some may disapprove of the heavy reliance on CGI, particularly in the later scenes, I found some of the new innovations to be brilliant and very effective. In this movie, the audacious house used to be a hospital for the criminally insane; in 1931, the inmates rebelled and attacked the people working there; the head doctor, who turned out to have been a mass murderer who unmercifully tortured his patients, managed to seal the building up, and all but five people died when a massive fire broke out. The fire must not have been too massive, however, because much of the torture equipment remains in place and, as we see, in working order. The electroshock equipment is effective, but the most interesting gadget is a chamber in which the victim is subjected to intense visual and aural stimuli. The most effective scene involves a guest who brought a digital camcorder along; as that person wanders around the basement, she begins seeing images of the former doctors and nurses "operating" on a patient--when she looks up, nothing is there, but when she looks through the camcorder, the disturbing black and white images appear. Many of the images show the long-dead doctor moving in a rather stilted but incredibly fast motion, which greatly enhances the creepiness of the scene.Although this is in many ways a very different movie from the original version, it does make use of several images and scenes from its predecessor, such as the parade of cars making their way up the hill and the introduction of "party favors" in little coffins. The DVD also includes trailers for the 1959 version and a short documentary comparing both versions of the film. The modern cast is pretty good, especially Geoffrey Rush as Stephen Price and Famke Janssen as his wife. The female characters are a definite improvement on those in the original, and an added bonus is Jeffrey Combs as the deranged Dr. Vannacutt. The makers of the movie can say that it is purely a coincidence that Geoffrey Rush has a strong resemblance to Vincent Price, but I'm not buying that particular argument. The effects are very good for the most part--there's plenty of blood and mutilation. The CGI effects will not please everyone, but I found them to work quite well, further distinguishing this movie from its forerunner--you won't see any skeletons on strings here. I do have a problem or two with the ending, but it does nothing to destroy the integrity of the movie. Although I consider the 1959 version a true classic, I must say I found the remake more enjoyable. This is largely due to the increased gore and effective scare tactics which are introduced very early on. This remake is not perfect by any means, but it is a more than worthy successor to the creepy yet now somewhat campy original version. Best of all, viewing one version does not prevent you from really enjoying the other one. One final point: the movie's not really over until you see the words THE END.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Could have been a very good film..., 22 Nov 2002
...if it weren't for the final 20 minutes or so. It's a shame because in the first half of the film, it was looking great. The beginning sequence shows, in graphic detail, the event which gave the house its history, a fire back in the early 30's after the patients brutally rebelled against the sadistic doctors. It certainly made me sit up and take notice. I thought the whole idea of a 'former mental asylum' and the 'scary doctors' worked very well. Mental abnormality is not something most people are familiar, or comfortable with and the film initially does well to play on the notion that people will fear what they do not understand. I thought the Stephen Price character worked well, the ringmaster type who for once, has lost control of one of his 'games', along with Pritchard the oddball owner of the house. Most of the other characters were fairly average, weak perhaps, and I don't think the audience really relates to them, or have a lot of sympathy for them, which is important in a film of this genre. Some of the sets and cinematography were excellent, the whole house seemed like one, dark maze ready to swallow anyone who dared rebel against it. The idea of the 'electro-shock therapy' and the chamber, where 'what would drive a sane man mad, would drive a madman sane', added to the effect the 'mental house' has on the audience. Unfortunately, as with its remake buddy 'The Haunting', it falls into the trap of overusing special effects at the film's climax, resulting in a silly, evil cloud thing that swallows people up. Not bad, but could have been so much more.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Have I missed something?, 3 Oct 2007
Blimey, what a terrible film. About as bad as it gets really. I was misled by other reviewers who described this as one of the scariest films they had ever seen. This was about as scary as father christmas. The acting was dreadful, even the usually superb Geoffrey Rush was hamming it up in a particularly annoying way. Please believe me that this is a waste of an hour and a half of your life. You'd be better watching the washing machine spin- far more entertaining and probably more scary, (particularly if there's a red sock in the wash!)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|