fairandfast1
Price: £0.01
In stock

woodys-uk
Price: £13.76
In stock

14 used & new from £0.01

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
The Rise of New Labour (Pocket essentials: Politics)
 
See larger image
 

The Rise of New Labour (Pocket essentials: Politics) (Paperback)

by Robin Ramsay (Author)
3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


5 new from £0.01 9 used from £0.01

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Politics & Paranoia

Politics & Paranoia

by Robin Ramsay
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £5.99
New Labour: Politics After Thatcherism

New Labour: Politics After Thatcherism

by Stephen Driver
£14.44
A Short History of the Labour Party

A Short History of the Labour Party

by Henry Pelling
4.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £14.82
Conspiracy Theories (Pocket Essentials)

Conspiracy Theories (Pocket Essentials)

by Robin Ramsay
4.0 out of 5 stars (3)  £5.99
Who Shot JFK? (Pocket Essentials)

Who Shot JFK? (Pocket Essentials)

by Robin Ramsay
3.4 out of 5 stars (9)  £7.49
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Paperback: 94 pages
  • Publisher: Pocket Essentials (10 Jan 2002)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 1903047838
  • ISBN-13: 978-1903047835
  • Product Dimensions: 17.2 x 11 x 1.2 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 403,238 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in this category:

    #46 in  Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Government & Politics > Countries & Regions > UK > Political Parties > Labour Party

Product Description

Synopsis

The Rise of New Labour? How did that happen? As everybody knows, Labour messed up the economy in the 1970s, went too far left, became 'unelectable' and let Mrs Thatcher in. After three General Election defeats Labour modernised, abandoned the left and had successive landslide victories in 1997 and 2001. That's the story they print in newspapers. The only problem is...- New Labour in 2001 got fewer votes than 'old' Labour did in 1992. - It wasn't Labour who messed up the economy in the 1970s but the Tories. - The Labour Party was handed to the left in 1983 by a conspiracy involving the Labour MPs about to defect to the Social Democratic Party. The real story of the rise of New Labour is more complex, and it involves the British and American intelligence services, the Israelis, and elite management groups like the Bilderbergers. Robin Ramsay untangles the myths and shows how it really happened that Gordon Brown sank gratefully into the arms of the bankers, Labour took on board the agenda of the City of London, and that nice Mr Blair embraced his role as the last dribble of Thatcherism down the leg of British politics.

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

The Rise of New Labour (Pocket essentials: Politics)
71% buy the item featured on this page:
The Rise of New Labour (Pocket essentials: Politics) 3.8 out of 5 stars (4)
The Labour Party: Continuity and Change in the Making of New Labour
14% buy
The Labour Party: Continuity and Change in the Making of New Labour
£19.36
Politics & Paranoia
5% buy
Politics & Paranoia 5.0 out of 5 stars (1)
£5.99
New Labour: Politics After Thatcherism
5% buy
New Labour: Politics After Thatcherism
£14.44

 

Customer Reviews

4 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.8 out of 5 stars (4 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Compulsory reading for all Labour activists, 29 Jun 2003
By Peter Ward (London, United Kingdom) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Speaking as a lifelong Labour Party member to have just resigned over the illegal invasion of Iraq, this little book should be compulsory reading for that dwindling band of Labour activists.

The summary puts Ramsay's case very well, so I need not add much here. It may though be added that the problem is a broader one. If, for instance, Neil Kinnock got more votes than Tony Blair then what we have now surely must be a failure of British democracy. Our 'first past the post' system should really be thrown into the dustbin of history, and why we Brits are always so darned reluctant to learn from our European neighbours (including how to manage a National Health Service, get the trains running on time and so on) should be a reason for national shame.

Speaking also as a barrister, I would like to add one theory to the question of why Blair joined the Labour Party in the first place (page 68, note 6). One explanation suggested by older colleagues is, whilst studying for his Bar Finals, young Blair fancied the star student of his year - Cherie Booth. The only snag was her ardent 'old' socialist ideals; especially with her brains she was doubtless a future MP and more. A (sham) conversion to her cause was thus essential, otherwise he'd no chance of wooing his way into her affections. And then, once hitched and practising, they agreed that whoever perchance stood first for Parliament would maintain that role with the other pursuing a legal career/looking after the kids etc. History had it that Blair was selected for the Beaconsfield by-election in, I think, 1981. Doubtless he was the man for that particular job, but, alas alack, if only the lady was chosen first ....

Finally a couple of gripes that otherwise would have lead to maximum star rating. Firstly, even a short tome like this would benefit from an index. If a larger, more detailed critique is ever produced (yes, please!), then that must be corrected. Secondly and flowing from that, Ramsay relies a great deal on news clippings and hearsay evidence. There are surely plenty of 'old' Labour politicians still out there - Lords Healy and Hattersley spring to my mind - whose consciences should be pricking them to come forward. If they were not contacted then that is a serious omission. And thirdly a surprising slip-up is its apparent assertion that Labour lost an election under John Smith's leadership (page 8). The great man of course sadly died before leading the Party to inevitable victory. Ah, another big if only ...

Otherwise four quid could not be better spent by anyone who cares for democracy, this fine country of ours, and who exactly is governing us.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The strange suicide of the Labour Party, 30 Dec 2002
By Penguin Egg (London, England) - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)   
One of the most remarkable events in post-war Britain is not the advent of Thatcherism, although that was remarkable enough; but the transformation of the Labour Party from a social democrat party with its roots in the urban working class and trade union movement to a conservative party in thrall to big business. ‘The Rise of New Labour’ tracks this transformation from Ted Heath’s government of the 70s through to the present day.

This booklet (pamphlet really) covers a lot of ground in its 94 pages, but Ramsay’s arguments are compelling and intriguing. According to Ramsay, Competition and Credit Control introduced under Heath abolished controls on borrowing. The interest rate alone would control credit in the economy. Heath hoped that this would create a credit boom that would finance industry. What happened instead were a consumer boom, a rise in property values, a flood of imports, and a trade deficit. Because Heath would not allow interest rates to rise high enough to suppress borrowing, he got roaring inflation. Trade Unions campaigned to increase the wages of their members in order to keep up with inflation. (As Ramsey points out, trade union militancy was not the cause of inflation, as was often stated, but the result of inflation. If unions were chasing after wage rises lower than inflation, they were effectively asking for a cut in wages. Therefore, to say that wage rises were responsible for inflation in the 70s is to mistake effect for cause. A myth that has become established as fact.) In 1973, Heath suspended Competition and Credit Control.

When Labour came back into power, inheriting Heath’s inflation, James Callaghan went to the IMF and borrowed money to defend the value of the pound, which by this time had taken a hammering. This they did. They also brought down inflation without causing a recession. The electorate thanked the Callaghan government by turfing them out of office and putting Thatcher into No. 10.

The nightmare began. Thatcher came in to power with the intention of bringing down inflation through controlling the money supply. Raising interest rates would do this. This would create a recession, but the long-term benefits would out-weigh the short-term cost, and if the manufacturing industry would bear the brunt of the recession, so be it. She didn’t care. Manufacturing was old hat. Manufacturing was also the base for the craft unions and where support for Labour lay. Who cared about them? Emphasis shifted away from manufacturing and towards finance, a shift that was to be financed by North Sea Oil. The City of London captured the imagination of the Conservative Party, and in time, the Labour Party as well. As a result, Britain’s manufacturing base was reduced to almost nothing. Northern England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland wallow in depression while the economy in the South East of England, where the financial industry resides, continually overheats.

This is the gist of Robin Ramsay’s argument, I think. Like most people, I’m no economist and in order to follow Ramsey’s argument, you need to keep your wits about you. There is more. He goes on at length to explain how after losing four elections in a row the Labour Party embraced Thatcherism in order to get elected; how the present incumbent of No. 10 recreated the Labour Party to resemble that of the American Democrat Party – always a paper tiger; and how the institutions of Britain (especially the Treasury) undermined Britain’s true interest. There is also an interesting look at the relationship between certain sections of British society, including the Labour Movement, and the United States. There is a lot to mull over here, but for those confused as to the direction of the Labour Party under Tony Blair, then Ramsey explains what happened, why it happened, and why it need never have happened. For those who refuse to accept the present consensus of neo-liberal doctrines, then this book should be a welcome addition to your armoury. Ramsey knows his stuff. He has done his homework. Read this booklet and you will see UK history in a different light.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars editor of 'Lobster' magazine assails some myths, 4 Feb 2009
By Jm Leven (London) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This is a very interesting look at Britain's economic and political history since the fall of the Heath government. Whether or not it is the 'absolute truth', it is certainly a take on events which is a welcome break from received and by-and-large unchallenged wisdom.

Robin Ramsay is the editor and substantial writer of 'Lobster' magazine, the 'journal of parapolitics' - that may sound far-fetched, but the journal (plain paper, no ads, hard to find except as subscription) has gained a solid reputation over its run since the early 80s - much praised by John Pilger, called 'the UK's most informative and prestigious journal' by Greg Palast. 'Parapolitics' pretty much covers the things that are going on that are not supposed to be going on, the 'secret state', if you like - he has a particular interest in what can be known about the undemocratic activities of the secret security services - what is commonly 'disparaged' as 'conspiracy theories'. But Ramsay is 'serious' - he marshals evidence, and makes it plain when he is conjecturing more than can be proved. He is also an engaging, urbane and courteous writer.
His focus here, however, is on the overt face of politics, and on the received wisdom about some aspects of modern British history. The centre of his focus is the 'winter of discontent' in 1979, when Jim Callaghan's Labour government asked the International Monetary Fund for assistance, and 'had to' accept terms which put them on a collision course with Labour's support base; not only the event, but the propaganda use that has been made of a particular interpretation of it - Old Labour's 'financial incompetence'. Ramsay's thesis is that the Ted Heath, the preceding Tory PM, effectively sacrificed the UK economy to meet the entry conditions for the European Union, and that it was 'political [public relations] incompetence' for Labour to allow the media to place the blame on them; also that there was no real need to go to the IMF - I think he makes a good case for this. In fact, I think he is still letting the Tories away with too much; I recently read the award-winning Glasgow University Media Group's first 2 books, 'Bad News' and 'More Bad News', which look at the way 'the winter of discontent' was covered by the media (tv particularly), and compare the coverage with available statistics - the frequency of industrial disputes was actually lower in the UK than most other European countries, and lower than the UK average. Anyway, from this factoid/myth came the mindset which led Old Labour to capitulate to the Blairites, and led to the monster we have today.
There is more on the specific origins of New Labour, particularly bravely on the role of Israeli money in bolstering Blair. But this is a short pamphlet, essentially just laying out some points for debate. There are a few notes, but there are more background and sources to be found in back issues of the magazine (available on a cd-rom, on Amazon -Lobster: The Journal of Parapolitics (issues 1-46. Sep 1983 to Winter 2003/4): Government Spies and Espionage,Uncovering Intelligence from Conspiracy Theories - expensive but worth it).
So I thoroughly recommend this - short, sweet, points to ponder.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

1.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing
This book offers a little insight into the rise of the New Labour movement, but far too often Ramsay seems to be ranting and he never seperates his own, very strong, political... Read more
Published on 10 Mar 2003 by pagechrisj

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.