the_book_de...
Price: £19.26
In stock

woodys-uk
Price: £34.38
In stock

14 used & new from £19.24

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
In Defense of Lost Causes
 
See larger image
 

In Defense of Lost Causes (Hardcover)

by Slavoj Zizek (Author)
2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


8 new from £19.24 6 used from £19.54

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Violence: Six sideways reflections (Big Ideas)

Violence: Six sideways reflections (Big Ideas)

by Slavoj Zizek
4.1 out of 5 stars (7)  £5.37
For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor (Radical Thinkers Series 3)

For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor (Radical Thinkers Series 3)

by Slavoj Zizek
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £5.48
First As Tragedy, Then As Farce

First As Tragedy, Then As Farce

by Slavoj Zizek
4.5 out of 5 stars (2)  £5.47
How to Read Lacan

How to Read Lacan

by S Zizek
3.8 out of 5 stars (5)  £7.85
Interrogating the Real

Interrogating the Real

by Slavoj Zizek
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £10.80
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Hardcover: 504 pages
  • Publisher: Verso Books (30 May 2008)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 1844671089
  • ISBN-13: 978-1844671083
  • Product Dimensions: 23 x 15.6 x 4.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 170,082 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Product Description

Review

Zizek leaves no social or cultural phenomenon untheorized, and is master of the counterintuitive observation --New Yorker

Zizek is a thinker who regards nothing as outside his field: the result is deeply interesting and provocative. --Guardian

The most formidably brilliant exponent of psychoanalysis, indeed of cultural theory in general, to have emerged in many decades. --Terry Eagleton


Product Description

'The era of grand explanations is over; we should no longer aim at all-explaining systems and global emancipatory projects; the violent imposition of grand solutions should leave room for forms of specific resistance and intervention. ... If the reader feels a minimum of sympathy with these lines, she should stop reading and cast aside this volume. This book is unashamedly committed to the Messianic standpoint of the struggle for universal emancipation.' - Slavoj Zizek . . . . . . . . . . . Is global emancipation a lost cause? Are universal values outdated relics of an earlier age? In fear of the horrors of totalitarianism should we submit ourselves to the reactionary third way of economic liberalism and government-as-administration? In this combative major new work, philosophical sharpshooter Slavoj Zizek takes on the reigning ideology with a plea that we should re-appropriate several lost causes, and looks for the kernel of truth in the totalitarian politics of the past. Examining Heidegger s seduction by fascism and Foucault s flirtation with the Iranian Revolution, he suggests that these were the right steps in the wrong direction. Highlighting the revolutionary terror of Robespierre, Mao and the Bolsheviks, i ek argues that while these struggles ended in historic failure and monstrosity, this is not the entire story. There was, in fact, a redemptive moment that gets lost in the outright liberal-democratic rejection of revolutionary authoritarianism and the valorization of soft, consensual, decentralized politics. Zizek claims that, particularly in the light of the forthcoming ecological crisis, we should reinvent revolutionary terror and the dictatorship of the proletariat in the struggle for universal emancipation. We need to courageously accept the return to this Cause even if we court the risk of a catastrophic disaster. In the words of Samuel Beckett: 'Try again. Fail again. Fail better.'

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?


 

Customer Reviews

2 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.5 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
28 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Zizek perhaps not at his best, 7 Jul 2008
By N. A. Bakhshov "nadimbakhshov" - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)      
This book started extremely well: the promise of a sustained argument drawing in the usual references from film, popular culture and the history of philosophy. I looked forward to his engaging Hegelian inversions - how true he is to Hegel I cannot say much in the same way I am not convinced Badiou is faithful to Plato. Anyway, it started well, some nice touches on Michael Crichton films but then suddenly something quite odd happened: the book seemed to fall apart in my hands. It began with a mediocre reading of the abysmal film of `300', using a Zizekian cliché to invert mainstream reading but adding nothing new. And then Zizek seemed to go off topic and began meandering - in the way Derrida does, the drift and focus of argument shifted and suddenly the worst features of Zizekian thought came into play: alluding to Badiou to give philosophical weight to what is a pretty weak position, arguing against some feature or trend in Hollywood films - the truth is he covered many of the same points in the DVD `The Pervert's Guide To Cinema' and added nothing new here - moving between one topic and another, making comments along the way which don't seem to accumulate any force, nor through sheer juxtaposition open up new avenues of thought. It became so boring - something I would never think of Zizek. But it has to be said: once you enter the syntax of Zizek's thought and can negotiate his grammar and language you then look for something substantial being argued for. I couldn't find it. So my overall conclusion is not so good: early Zizek: excellent, genuinely fresh and challenging and occasionally innovative. Recent Zizek: repetitive, re-working old ideas without adding anything, self-referring in a way that is irritating - he often gives you the impression that his position, in parts, has been well established through some earlier discussion - but it hasn't. There is something lazy in this book - something of the obsessional turning out books but not really developing his thought.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
2 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars A Zizekian paradigm shift?, 28 Jan 2009
By Mr. M. PITTOUNIKOS "a-beautiful-idea" (Liverpool, UK) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Im sorry but we have to seperate Zizek's charm and charisma from his methodology.

What Zizek propounds is basically profundity disguised as cleverness, and offers a hilarious piece of comedy for this age. This is because the truth is vouchsafe and so can stand on its own two feet. It doesn't need to be cloaked by jargon and profundity you see.

So I believe that Zizek's post-modernism narcotizes the intellect and stifles all real progress. This is because it promotes a fantastic elevation of Psychoanalytic and Marxist theory, and so announcing the hollowest anti-scientific jargon since man first put finger to pen.

For example, Zizek is forever hyping up the likes of Hegel and Lacan. Hegel is his main source of inspiration you see. Lacan is his second, being early 20th century and all that! Zizek should try looking to more modern philosophers rather than Hegel and Lacan. The spell that these thinkers have cast over him not only make him blind to other philosophies, but to science itself. Thus when you read Zizek you will not find much in the way of 21st century ideas like genetics or evolution. I wonder why that is? Zizek rigidly sticks to the 19th century with Hegelian logic but what about the works of Godel or Frege? Albert Einstein doesn't even get a shout out!

Zizek is rightly critical of "New-Age obscurantism". But I believe that he discredits himself with his fixation on the hard-to-fathom Hegel and Lacan. So he will write some good solid prose but after a few paragraphs break into a Lacanian rant about the hidden meaning of toilets!

This is just my personal bias, but I believe that Zizek is obviously an intelligent bloke but scribbles nonsense for the fame and glory this seems to bring European thinkers. He propounds ideas without feeling, such as Stalin humanizing us! Now please substitute Stalin for Hitler and see how clever it sounds. Statements without logic are just wrong.

So if you can stand 500 pages of this and don't feel as if you were in a police state trying to get out, then you have qualified as a vanguardist for the coming Zizekian revolution.

An alternative to the Anglo-Saxon ideas? Not a chance. The world and her struggles have moved on from this sort of proletarian theology.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.