|
|
52 of 57 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Grisham is BROKE, 17 Jun 2005
Joel Backman has been serving 6 years of a 20 year jail sentence when he is unexpectedly pardoned by the out-going US President. Backman was once a highly influential political power-broker with friends (and enemies) in the highest places. But when he became involved in trading software that had the ability to hack into another country's latest and most sophisticated defence satellite system, he had faced a choice of confession or likely assassination. He chose to confess, needless to say. Now without prior warning he has been set free, although he's being very closely tracked by the CIA (who manipulated the president for Backman's release) and, eventually, secret agents from a number of other countries.Choosing a new Grisham novel is rarely a difficult decision, he's a good story teller and several of his earlier works have been converted into big-budget movies. I doubt that this will be one of them however. As I progressed through the story, I became more and more interested in the story that wasn't told - the events leading up to Backman's arrest 6 years ago - and wondered if this book was actually a sequel to a previous novel which covered that storyline. I'm pretty sure it wasn't, and it made me wonder if Grisham could have created a better novel if he had told that story rather than this "sequel". It seems to me that there would have been a lot more excitement, more tension and good old entertainment than in The Broker. Much of the story takes place in Italy, where Backman has been forced to hide (by the CIA), and it wasn't long before I gained the impression that his culture-adaptation and learning of local history was similar to his own experiences (Grisham's) while he researched the book. I know that it was right that he should go there to better understand the ways of Italian people, but his experiences seemed to influence the story more than they need have done. And I found Grisham's stereotypes of "Europeans" very irritating, occasionally referring to them as if everyone in Europe comes from the same small village. While not exactly racist, it does nevertheless sound rather ridiculous, as we know only too well that the characteristics and attitudes of European people vary enormously, in fact in Britain alone we have a widely diverse culture. To illustrate, I quote from Chapter 12 : "Space is shared in Europe, not protected. Tables are shared, the air evidently is shared because smoking bothers no-one. Cars, houses, buses, apartments, cafes - so many important aspects of life are smaller, thus more cramped, thus more willingly shared. It's not offensive to go nose-to-nose with an acquaintance during routine conversation because no space is being violated. Talk with your hands, hug, embrace, even kiss at times." Well, that may be true in Bologna, but I'm not sure it applies in Basildon. Or Birmingham, or Basingstoke, or Bolton for that matter. Despite this sweeping, generalistic description of us "Europeans", Grisham is keen to point out the cultural differences between those from Texas compared to those of Tenessee, the characteristics of a Canadian as opposed to an American, and why someone from Manhattan is different from someone from Memphis. And I'm sure that many readers of The Broker will have found, as I did, the seemingly endless translations of Italian to English more than a little irritating. We got the point after one page of it - but it went on for ages until it became like an Italian-English phrase book. This book could have been hugely improved by omitting the naive 'Euro-observations' (American style), cutting back on 90% of the translation, and perhaps replacing that with the untold story of the events which took place before Backman was jailed. At least half a book could have been dedicated to those past years, it could have been called 'Part One', there could then have been a 'Part Two' entitled "Six Years Later" which would have been a condensed version of the story we are actually given here. This was, in the end, frustrating for me because there's no doubt that Grisham is (was?) a very good story-teller, but on this occasion he has been rather casual, not stretching his once vivid imagination to the fullest, and failing to come up with a really gripping, entertaining story that we all know he is capable of. And I have to disagree with the opinions of one or two other reviewers here who thought the ending was fast-paced and exciting; it wasn't. Quite the opposite - I was waiting for some kind of bombshell, but then I reached the final page and I was still waiting. It just fizzled away meekly. It's almost as if Grisham spent an extended holiday in Italy, decided to write his memoirs of that mini-odyssey, and to make money he built a mildly interesting fictional story around it.
|